Monday, October 31, 2016

Rudolf Hess in Spandau prison....
unseen pics taken by a prison guard/British soldier !
 




Never before seen pics of Rudolf Hess, showing the lonely old man on a bitterly cold winters day in Berlin. An ex- British Army lad took a spy camera in and took these pics, whilst on duty at Spandau prison. He has only just released them. He would have been in very serious 'doo - doo' if caught ! He used a little 'Minox ' spy camera bought in the American PX .

Click the pics to enlarge.

Friday, October 28, 2016

Justice for Sergeant Blackman: Former soldiers protest in Parliament Square over Marine serving a life sentence for 'mercy killing' in Afghanistan

  • Royal Marine was jailed for life in 2013 Taliban insurgent in Helmand province, Afghanistan in 2011
  • Supporters say he has been made a scapegoat and the fighter he killed was already fatally wounded
  • Retired Royal Marines formed a 'sea of green berets' in Westminster today to show their support

Hundreds of people have gathered outside Parliament to protest over the jailing of a Royal Marine for the murder of an Afghan insurgent.
Sergeant Alexander Blackman was handed a life sentence after he killed the wounded captive at close range with a 9mm pistol in Helmand province in September 2011.
Blackman's supporters have campaigned for a retrial by claiming he was a scapegoat. Campaigners say that the man was already fatally wounded before being killed by Blackman.
The Ministry of Defence has reportedly banned serving military personnel from attending the show of solidarity. 
Former soldiers held a protest in Parliament Square today demanding justice for Sergeant Alex Blackman
Former soldiers held a protest in Parliament Square today demanding justice for Sergeant Alex Blackman
Hundreds attended the rally for the Royal Marine, who was jailed for life for killing an insurgent in Afghanistan
Hundreds attended the rally for the Royal Marine, who was jailed for life for killing an insurgent in Afghanistan
Supporters are angry at delays to the Royal Marine's case while he continues to serve time in a British prison
Supporters are angry at delays to the Royal Marine's case while he continues to serve time in a British prison
Former and serving members of the armed forces spoke to the crowds at the rally including MP Richard Drax (pictured)
Former and serving members of the armed forces spoke to the crowds at the rally including MP Richard Drax (pictured)
QC Jonathan Goldberg, who is acting for Blackman, told the crowd that English law does not recognise a 'mercy killing', but in the past authorities had the sense not to press charges in such cases.
Mr Goldberg said a soldier would now have to 'ring his solicitor before firing his rifle'.
Footage from another marine's helmet-mounted camera showed Blackman quoting Shakespeare before shooting the insurgent.
He told the fighter: 'There you are. Shuffle off this mortal coil, you c***. It's nothing you wouldn't do to us.'
Blackman's minimum sentence was reduced to eight years but his challenge to the outcome of the original trial was unsuccessful.
Ten months ago, Sgt Blackman’s family submitted an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to have his case reviewed.
A supporter holds a flag with Sergeant Blackman's face on it. The crowd are demanding the case is re-examined
A supporter holds a flag with Sergeant Blackman's face on it. The crowd are demanding the case is re-examined
More flag raising: Footage from another marine's helmet-mounted camera was used as evidence in Sergrant Blackman's case
More flag raising: Footage from another marine's helmet-mounted camera was used as evidence in Sergrant Blackman's case
Sergeant  Blackman will spend eight years behind bars until he is eligible for parole but he lost a challenge to his convicted
Sergeant Blackman will spend eight years behind bars until he is eligible for parole but he lost a challenge to his convicted
QC Jonathan Goldberg, who is acting for Blackman, told the crowd that English law does not recognise a 'mercy killing', but in the past authorities had the sense not to press charges in such cases
QC Jonathan Goldberg, who is acting for Blackman, told the crowd that English law does not recognise a 'mercy killing', but in the past authorities had the sense not to press charges in such cases
The rally due to its prominent position near Westminster was seen by many passers-by and tourists
The rally due to its prominent position near Westminster was seen by many passers-by and tourists
A comprehensive report delivered by Blackman’s legal team, headed by Jonathan Goldberg QC, set out eight significant arguments in support of a case review by the Appeal Court.
They include the fact that his troop had suffered six months on the ‘tour from hell’ under-manned, under-resourced and under daily Taliban assault, before Sgt Blackman snapped.
His lawyers argue there was significant ‘combat stress’ which could support his conviction being commuted from murder to manslaughter.
The case has been dogged with delays, despite the CCRC giving it top priority.
Tory MP Richard Drax has previously said: 'While I am delighted that his case is being treated as a top priority by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, it does appear to be taking an inordinate amount of time to conclude.
'Meanwhile, a good man continues to rot in jail, a man whom I believe has not received justice, a man whom has served his country with distinction, a man whom we have turned our backs on when he needed us most.' 
Sergeant Blackman's wife Claire Blackman also spoke to all those showing support for her husband
Sergeant Blackman's wife Claire Blackman also spoke to all those showing support for her husband
Hundreds of retired Marines - forming a ‘sea of green’ berets - and  members of the public will gather for the demonstration
Hundreds of retired Marines - forming a ‘sea of green’ berets - and members of the public will gather for the demonstration
Former and serving members of the armed forces of all ages attended along with crowds of members of the public
Former and serving members of the armed forces of all ages attended along with crowds of members of the public
Sergeant Blackman (pictured), known as ‘Marine A’ at his court martial, killed a Taliban insurgent in Afghanistan in 2011
Sergeant Blackman (pictured), known as ‘Marine A’ at his court martial, killed a Taliban insurgent in Afghanistan in 2011
According to camera footage Sergeant Blackman told the fighter to 'shuffle off this mortal coil, you c***. It's nothing you wouldn't do to us.'
According to camera footage Sergeant Blackman told the fighter to 'shuffle off this mortal coil, you c***. It's nothing you wouldn't do to us.'
Sergeant Blackman's legal team argue he suffered six months on the ‘tour from hell’ under-manned, under-resourced and under daily Taliban assault
Sergeant Blackman's legal team argue he suffered six months on the ‘tour from hell’ under-manned, under-resourced and under daily Taliban assault
Tory MP Richard Drax who spoke to those, many of whom expressed their upset, has previously said 'a good man continues to rot in jail, a man whom I believe has not received justice, a man whom has served his country with distinction, a man whom we have turned our backs on when he needed us most'
Tory MP Richard Drax who spoke to those, many of whom expressed their upset, has previously said 'a good man continues to rot in jail, a man whom I believe has not received justice, a man whom has served his country with distinction, a man whom we have turned our backs on when he needed us most'

“Child refugees” are coming to the UK. Why is the Jewish community so determined to bring them in?

Francis Carr Begbie


Citizens UK Private Sponsorship Chanukah Video from Charlotte Fischer on Vimeo.

Citizens UK Private Sponsorship Chanukah Video from Charlotte Fischer on Vimeo.
The dismantling of the Calais “Jungle” refugee camp has been marked by huge scenes of disorder with rioting, at least one gang rape, and much of the camp going up in flames. But there has been uproar in Britain too since the realisation that most of the thousands of “child refugees”, which the Prime Minister had agreed to accept, were neither children nor refugees.
From the moment these healthy, strapping adult male migrants stepped off the bus in London it was obvious that the British people had been subjected to yet another massive immigration deception. Those who enabled and organised this “child refugee” scam are brazening it out, safe in the knowledge there will be no comebacks for them.
First they attempted to prevent any more embarrassing pictures by throwing blankets over the arrivals so they resembled state witnesses at a Mafia trial. Then a screened walkway from the bus alighting point to the door of the reception centre was erected overnight for the same purpose. Dental tests to determine the real age of these youths were ruled out as an “invasion of privacy.” And there is no question of having them deported, so nothing can be done now. They’re here. Get over it.
But of course, it all works better if there is no clamour from the public. So the powers-that-be have resorted to the tried and tested method of stifling dissent. Anyone who sticks his head above the parapet to raise doubts is subjected to stern lectures about their moral shortcomings. BBC TV presenter Gary Lineker chastised his fellow British for their “shameful” attitudes, while Labour shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott attacked those who wanted to carry out dental tests to assess their age as “racist.” Pop singer Lily Allen became a media darling when, on behalf of the people of Britain, she made a tearful apology to the refugees for causing their plight.
Let that sink in. Britain caused the plight of the refugees.
Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

After voting for Brexit, for ordinary British people, who have seen their schools, hospitals and welfare services strained to breaking point, a fresh influx of immigrants was not exactly what they had been looking forward to. After all, Britain has no legal or moral obligation to take these people. They were supposed to be the responsibility of the first country they arrived at in the EU. And why are they coming to racist Europe anyway? It’s incredibly short-sighted of them. Why not go to some Asian or African country? Or Israel?
This fresh burden will be placed squarely on the local authorities that receive the immigrants, and they are going to have to dig deeply. While the government is providing £40,000 ($48,000) per annum for each young refugee, the total annual cost is around £133,000 ($162,000). So tax increases — or reduced services in other areas — are predicted.
Naturally little of this will fall on the prosperous London boroughs filled with BBC-watching, morally uplifted Whites. Instead many migrants are being located in far-flung areas such as Devon or poorer northern communities already thronging with refugees, such as Bradford.
The tipping point in the long battle to admit these bogus “child refugees” seems to have been a multi-faith initiative in which more than 200 religious leaders led by the former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Williams and senior representatives from the Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim and Sikh faiths — signed a letter urging the Prime Minister to admit 3,000.
In a speech at a London synagogue, Lord Williams described the Calais camp as “a stain” on the British conscience. But in fact, this alleged multi-faith support was not what it appeared to be.  It was largely organised by dozens of Jewish activists working through an organisation called Citizens UK that organised the casework and poured substantial resources into ensuring that the necessary amendments to the law would make it through Parliament.
The Calais “Jungle” crisis has brought the Jewish community together in a unity of purpose rarely seen outside the occasion of Israel’s various wars. From the highest communal levels to the smallest youth groups, it seems everyone Jewish has been mobilised in the cause of getting uneducated, unassimilable Muslim economic migrants into Britain.
It is a campaign they have chosen to frame in entirely moral terms. The Jewish community’s loud insistence has been that not only is Britain under a strict moral obligation to take these migrants but that there should be no upper limit. To do otherwise would be to undermine our reputation as a humanitarian country that wishes to describe itself as civilised.
Their arguments have been formed around highly emotional anecdotes and images. Time and again we have been treated to stories of children struggling in the squalor at the Calais “Jungle” camp. The iconic photographs of the lifeless body of three-year-old Syrian boy Aylan Kurdi washed up on a Turkish beach are frequently invoked.
You will notice that nowhere is there any consideration of the stress this is causing on existing British communities, especially those in the poorer areas where refugees are invariably housed. Nor is there any recognition of the profound unfairness this imposes on the native White community who will be required to support these strangers via the welfare system, health and housing services. Such a process is not only unaffordable, it makes a mockery of the basic idea that help from the welfare state is in return from previous tax contributions.
There is a largely unspoken reason for this:  resentment over Britain’s perceived inadequacy in admitting Jewish refugees before World War II. In fact, Britain admitted many tens of thousands of Jews in the 1930s, but it is an article of faith amongst many Jews that Britain could and should have admitted many more.
Typical of this attitude was the speech of Rabbi Herschel Gluck, founder of the Muslim-Jewish Forum. He says he lost over 100 relatives in the Holocaust and implied that Britain’s wartime attitudes to refugees were to blame for this. “I feel obliged to ensure we don’t make the same mistakes,” he said.
Numerous references were made to the Kindertransport programme by which Jewish children from Europe were smuggled into Britain. (The TOO has already debunked much of this greatly mythologised episode.)
A veteran of that same Kindertransport is the figurehead for the Calais refugee crusade. eighty-four year old Lord Alf Dubs , a veteran Labour politician. He has  tirelessly campaigned for mass immigration all his life. A former director of the Refugee Council, he somehow arrived in Britain aged six in 1939 despite Britain’s horrendous attitudes at the time, and was shown much Christian charity. Since then, he has chosen to repay this kindness by devoting his life to opening Britain’s borders to non-Whites from around the globe.
According to EU law, refugees should have been processed at the first country they arrived at, so some ruse had to dreamed up whereby Britain could allow their entry. This was done through a device known as the EU’s Dublin III regulation, whereby lone refugee children could be taken to any European country where they have a relative.
This was not enough for Lord Dubs.  He wanted the “child refugees” in the Calais “Jungle” admitted to Britain without any “family reunion” qualification and pushed his own amendment which would oblige the British government to transfer to the UK any unaccompanied refugee children from Europe.
To this end Lord Dubs was able to count on wholesale establishment support. Not just the Archbishop of Canterbury but charities, NGOs and even economists all rallied round.
TOO has already shown the hugely disproportionate Jewish influence on a similar letter from senior lawyers. The same disproportionately Jewish influence can be seen in the plea from the 126 economists. One of the signatories was Jonathan Portes, who can be fairly regarded as the architect of Tony Blair’s mass immigration disaster.
So it seemed as if the passing of the Dubs amendment to an immigration bill was a foregone conclusion.  But then at the vote in the House of Commons there was a problem. For Conservative politicians had not long finished fighting a general election campaign in which their voters had left them in no doubt how they felt about the never-ending waves of mass immigration.
In the House of Commons the Dubs amendment was defeated.  Jewish campaigners could barely contain their anger. The nagging, scolding words of Dr. Edie Friedman, director of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality, were characteristic.
As a result, children across Europe will remain cold, alone and at risk over the coming months. This was an opportunity to stand on the right side of history, to bring relief to just 3,000 of the 95,000 unaccompanied children who applied for asylum in Europe last year.
We wake up this morning on the wrong side of history and on the wrong side of compassion.The Immigration Bill has shown the UK at its worst, uncaring about the suffering of children a mere 30 miles away in places like Calais, but it has also shown us (sic!) at our best.
Rabbi Harry Jacobi too was beside himself with anger at MPs voting in accordance with their electorate’s wishes. For him loomed the shadow of 1938, when Britain decided to stop the flood of Jewish refugees.
Too many MPs with hardened hearts, just like the biblical story of Pharaoh. To close their eyes and hearts to unaccompanied children, to insist that it is alright to detain pregnant women, and that refugees can still be detained indefinitely simply on the say so of an immigration official. These are not the actions of a world-leading moral civilisation.
Then, in one of his last acts as Prime Minister, David Cameron did a U-turn and announced he would allow the amendment to go through unopposed. Now Britain could admit the bogus 3,000 “refugee children” unilaterally.
Citizens UK’s main task seems to be getting migrants or “refugees” into Britain and dispersed around the country. It describes itself as a “community organiser’s hub,” but is in fact an arm of the state with deep pockets and a nationwide network of affiliated organisations. It has fought many legal battles for refugees and succeeded in getting migrant “child asylum seekers” released from detention centres and housed in the wider community.
So how Jewish is it?  At letterhead level it seems to be drawn from a cross-section of the community, but at organiser level, the Citizens UK appears to be disproportionately Jewish. (This tactic of recruiting sympathetic non-Jews and giving them highly visible position in Jewish-dominated causes has a very long history, going back at least to immigration battles in the early twentieth century, as recounted in Chapter 6 of SAID [p. 192ff] and Chapter 7 of Culture of Critique [e.g., pp. 249-250].) They include the Citizens UK spokeswoman, Rabbi Janet Darley, who, of course, has a tear-jerking story to tell. She said it was when a 15-year-old migrant fell under the wheels of a truck he was trying to board that she felt that she had to get involved.
For me, that was the deal breaker — I knew I couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t do everything I could to make sure there were no more dead children. … The Torah warns us against the wronging of a stranger. For us, this is core teaching and not an optional extra.
Another Jewish Citizens UK activist is senior organiser Charlotte Fischer, who is lobbying for Britain to increase the total number of “Syrian” refugees it has agreed to take  from 20,000 to 50,000. “We are doing shamefully compared to Canada” she chides.
But the UK is doing awesomely compared to Israel. Doesn’t that count for anything?
Citizens UK campaigner Rabbi Danny Rich is co-chair of yet another arm of the refugee industry, the National Refugee Welcome Board. He clearly has the magic touch when it comes to getting access on the BBC. Since the beginning of September he has graced at least half a dozen BBC outlets including the main BBC TV news and the BBC World Service and gets softball kidglove treatment from all of them. He blithely brushed aside the concerns of ordinary British people: “Look at the Kindertransport and the contribution made to Britain over the last 70 years by those who escaped the Nazis. Look at the contributions made today by doctors, nurses and care workers, many of who were not English born.”  Anyone doubting the distinctly Jewish flavour of Citizens UK would be advised to look at this promotional video, also featured at the beginning of this article.
Of course, no British refugee campaign would be complete without the presence of Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner who can be guaranteed to be at the forefront at any number of “multi faith” immigrant events including a Citizens UK vigil outside the House of Commons.
Citizens UK is an umbrella organisation overseeing local grass roots initiatives for refugees all over the country, many of which are Jewish-organised. One of the main ones is called Safe Passage UK. In an article for the Jewish Chronicle, the two Jewish organisers described their work as “fighting injustice.”  Apparently a group of synagogues had raised £200,000 for them in just a few weeks.
Rabbi Rebecca Birk was recently named by the Evening Standard as one of London’s most influential people for her fund raising for Safe Passage UK. Again, her entire rationale is bound up with her Jewish identity, framed, of course, as a moral imperative stemming from the inherently moral essence of Judaism. She says:
The Jewish identity is predicated on being a foreigner, relying on the kindness of strangers, it runs through our own theology really: doing good, mending the world. We talk of three pillars the world stands on — the Torah, divine service, and kind acts. It’s an anathema to be a Jew and only be concerned with oneself.
A clear sense of Jewish identity also informed the efforts of the three fashionable north London women who decided to put their media careers on hold to set up the Help Refugees charity in the Calais “Jungle.” The women, two of whom are Jewish, have tapped into a lucrative market indeed, and their outfit was one of the biggest players in Calais. It has been a massive, trendy, profile-raising success. After setting up, they were inundated with corporate contributions, and now they run 26 projects from Israel and on the migrant trail all the way across Europe. Articles about them focus on “child refugees.” And because Hollywood is well-known for its high moralism, it is not surprising that actors such as Benedict Cumberbatch and Lena Dunham have lent their support.
Help Refugees even has a mobile kitchen on to the shores of Greece where their volunteers are helping refugees from Turkey from their dinghies and then seeing them off on their long journey across Europe. One of these women, Dani Lawrence, insists her parents fled anti-Semitism in Morocco in the sixties.
The Jewish community has an extremely high opinion of its charitable efforts. Their strong Jewish identities and loyalty to their tribe are obvious, and it is wonderful that all that philanthropy makes them feel so good about themselves. But it might be worthwhile for the White British to ask what exactly is in it for them, apart from Kosher certification?
It is time to ask some searching questions about the real motives that lie behind all this Jewish selflessness.  After all, a charitable disposition towards Muslims is not exactly a characteristic of Jewish life anywhere else and certainly not in the Palestinian territories. And no question is guaranteed to infuriate Jewish activists more than asking why Israel doesn’t admit any refugees from Syria which is, after all, next door?
So what do they get out of this sudden influx of unassimilable immigrants who have neither the temperament nor inclination to fit into modern Britain? Sadly, as readers of TOO are all to familiar with (see, e.g., “Is immigration a Jewish value?“), the motivation is not compassion but veiled ethnic vindictiveness aimed at undermining and dispossessing ordinary British people.
One of the questions that British people might also ask themselves is this: If those British people in the 1930s who had admitted waves of Jewish refugees could see the fruits of what they had done, what would they think?
If those British people, who were to suffer so much in a war they were told was about “freedom”, if they were to see the streets of Peckham, Newham or any number of London boroughs or cities today overrun by Third-Worlders, what would they think?
And if they were to then told, in detail, about the role of Jewish activism, power and “philanthropy” in bringing about this transformation, what would their thoughts be then?Perhaps they would agree with so many of us.  That the Jewish invocation to “heal the world” seems to be code-words for eradicating White identity and eradicating the power of Whites to control their own destiny.
And perhaps, instead of admitting these “child refugees,” Britain would have been better off remembering the words of another Jewish sage, economist Milton Friedman, who said “You can have a welfare state or you can have open borders, but you cannot have both.”
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/10/where-are-the-child-refugees/

Thursday, October 27, 2016

Israel condemns 'shameful' House of Lords event where the audience applauded claims that JEWS were responsible for the Holocaust

  • Footage emerges from event calling for government to apologise for 1917 Balfour declaration which called for Jews to be given home in Palestine
  • Audience member applauded for claiming Hitler decided to kill six million Jews because he was 'antagonised over the edge' by an American Rabbi
  • Male audience member also compared Israel to ISIS at event in Parliament
  • Israeli embassy condemns event for 'giving voice to racist tropes'

Israel has condemned a 'shameful event' hosted by the House of Lords where the audience applauded claims that Jews were responsible for the Holocaust. 
Former Lib Dem peer Baroness Tonge, now independent, hosted an event in Parliament earlier this week to launch a campaign demanding the British Government apologises for the Balfour declaration of 1917, which called Jews to be given a home in Palestine.
An audience member described as an ultra-orthadox Jew was applauded for suggesting Hitler decided to kill six million Jews because he was antagonised by a Rabbi in New York who urged people to boycott German goods. 
Footage of a House of Lords even hosted by Baroness Tonge (pictured in the red top, centre) earlier this week shows audience members clapping after a man told the meeting: 'If anybody is antisemitic, it's the Israelis themselves' 
Footage of a House of Lords even hosted by Baroness Tonge (pictured in the red top, centre) earlier this week shows audience members clapping after a man told the meeting: 'If anybody is antisemitic, it's the Israelis themselves' 
He said Hitler was antagonised 'over the edge' by the American Zionist Rabbi Stephen Wise, who caused the Nazi leader to 'systematically kill Jews wherever he could find them'.  
Footage of the hugely controversial meeting also showed the male audience member referring to a famous quote regularly used by Holocaust deniers to suggest the figure of six million Jews killed by the Nazis was a hoax.
He won more applauds after telling the meeting: 'If anybody is antisemitic, it's the Israelis themselves.' 
And he compared Israel to ISIS, saying: 'Isis is a perversion of Islam just as Zionism is a perversion of Judaism.' 
A spokesman for the Israeli embassy described the House of Lords gathering as 'a shameful event' that 'gave voice to racist tropes against Jews and Israelis alike'. 
The spokesman added that it was 'hard to believe that this happened at [the] House of Lords'. 
Baroness Tonge is a controversial peer and was forced to resign the Lib Dem whip in 2012 after claiming the state of Israel was 'not going to be there forever'.
When MailOnline contacted her about the Balfour campaign event this morning she hung up the phone.     
Baroness Tonge (pictured) is a controversial peer and was forced to resign the Lib Dem whip in 2012 after claiming the state of Israel was 'not going to be there forever'
Baroness Tonge (pictured) is a controversial peer and was forced to resign the Lib Dem whip in 2012 after claiming the state of Israel was 'not going to be there forever'
Her 'apology for Balfour' campaign aims to put pressure on the Government to issue an apology for signing a pledge to give Jews a home in Palestine on the hundreth anniversary of the declaration next year. 
The campaign is launching a petition on the Government's website, which if it reaches 100,000 signatures will be considered for debate by MPs. 
And the campaign is planning to hold a public demonstration in Trafalgar Square on the hundreth anniversary on November 2 next year.  
The audience member at the centre of the row repeated a famous quote from the American Zionist Rabbi Stephen Wise, who wrote in the New York Times in 1905: 'There are six million, note the number, bleeding and suffering reasons to justify Zionism'. 
The 'note the number' quote has been used by Holocaust deniers to claim that Jews had already decided on the six million figure 40 years before the Nazis carried out the Holocaust. 
They claim that this quote from Rabbi Wise proves that the Holocaust is a hoax. 
Explaining how he believed Hitler was 'antagonised' into killing Jews by Rabbi Wise, the audience member continued: 'Thirty years later, he made the boycott on Germany, the economic boycott on Germany which antagonised Hitler, over the edge, to then want to systematically kill Jews wherever he could find them. 
'As opposed to "Judenrein", to make Germany free of Jews, a Jew free land. Which is enough, but that is noted by one of our Rabbis, that is what pushed him over the edge. 
'His personal secretary Ribbentrop was in Nuremberg trials, he said to Rabbi Wise: This is what, he became a madman after this boycott, Judea declares war on Germany. In Manhattan they had 100, 000 people marching in the economic boycott in 1935, it was the same heretic rabbi who caused that.'
The footage of the meeting was posted online by the Palestinian Return Centre
An audience member at the House of Lords event said Hitler was antagonised 'over the edge' by the American Zionist Rabbi Stephen Wise (pictured), who caused the Nazi leader to 'systematically kill Jews wherever he could find them'
An audience member at the House of Lords event said Hitler was antagonised 'over the edge' by the American Zionist Rabbi Stephen Wise (pictured), who caused the Nazi leader to 'systematically kill Jews wherever he could find them'
 
NWN: An history lesson seems to be needed here. The Balfour Declaration was a conspiracy by 'secret jews' and the zionist Prime Minister Lloyd George together with Rothschild for giving Palestine to the jews. Which was probably the real reason for WW1 - certainly it's escalation into a world war. That was also the 'price' for bringing the USA into the war against Germany. T.E. Lawrence/Lawrence of Arabia, was bitterly angry by this deception, has he had been about the earlier Sykes-Picot agreement. He had been duped by the politicians and their 'real rulers'.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

 Ahead of the American entry into World War I, it became clear that Woodrow Wilson and his advisors were in favor of Zionism. Six months before the Declaration, this front page article from the Charlotte Observer notes the announcement that Balfour and Wilson had "informally discussed" the project.

Friday, October 21, 2016


Hillary Clinton Begs Forgiveness From Rothschilds In Leaked Email

clintonsrothschild
Hillary Clinton asked Lady de Rothschild “Let me know what penance I owe you” after requesting Tony Blair accompany her on official business, preventing him from attending a Rothschild event scheduled for that same weekend.
The Clintons with Sir and Lady de Rothschild at a 2003 party.
 
Though the influence of money in politics is well-known, many people are amazed to learn that most of that money comes from a very few individuals – the 1% of the 1% as it were. These individuals comprise the global elite, whose mind-boggling fortunes are often used to buy ‘favors’ and even set policy in governments all over the world, not just the United States. Many of these elites made their fortunes through centuries-old banking dynasties. The most infamous of these are undoubtedly the Rothschild family, who have been the world’s wealthiest family for over 200 years.
Indeed, the most well-known Rothschild patriarch, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, once saidGive me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.” The Rothschilds and their international banking cartel, ‘Rothschild & Co,’ are majority owners of numerous corporations spanning nearly every industry. They are also co-owners of numerous private banks including the International Monetary Fund, which essentially functions as a global loan shark with no government or international oversight, as well as many of the world’s central banks, which are private entities despite their associations with federal governments.
Several politicians, especially those who are the most willing to bend over backwards for wealthy interests, have made their careers by catering to the whims of the Rothschilds and other families like them. In US politics today, there is no better example of this archetype than Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. In fact, less than two months ago, Clinton flew just 20 miles in a private jet to attend a private Rothschild fundraiser in her honor. Yet, this is just one of the latest examples of her intimate relationship to the banking dynasty.
In emails from her private server made available to the public by WikiLeaks, Clinton’s close relationship to Lady de Rothschild is evident due to their warm exchanges which include phrases such as “You are the best […] Sweet dreams,” “I remain your loyal adoring pal,” and “Much love.” This is significant as, judging by Clinton’s other emails, her communication style is almost always curt and concise, never approaching the outright declarations of affection found only in her exchanges with Lady de Rothschild. Lady de Rothschild, married into the Rothschild family in 2000 after being introduced to Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, who alone is worth $20 billion, at the 1998 Bilderberg Conference. War criminal Henry Kissinger served as the couple’s “match-maker.”
Yet, the most bizarre interaction between Clinton and Lady de Rothschild took place in an email titled “Info for you” (ID#1606), which was sent while Clinton was serving as US Secretary of State. In the email, Clinton tells Lady de Rothschild that she had to ask Tony Blair (then-Prime Minister of England) to accompany her to Israel due to the Middle East peace negotiations taking place at the time. Blair had previously planned to spend the weekend in Aspen, Colorado with the Rothschilds at an unspecified conference, but accepted Clinton’s invitation. Clinton then says “I hope you all understand. […] Let me know what penance I owe you.” For those who are not familiar with the word, penance is defined as follows: “An act of self-mortification or devotion performed voluntarily to show sorrow for a sin or other wrongdoing.” Does this sound like something Hillary Clinton would normally say?
clintonpenanceemail
Considering that her former bodyguard once said she could “make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi,” this seems doubtful. More importantly, why would someone as powerful as Secretary of State literally grovel for forgiveness from a private citizen? The circumstance is truly bizarre considering Clinton offers “penance” or asking the Prime Minister of England to decline an invitation to the Rothschilds’ weekend getaway in order to attend high-stakes peace negotiations. This email clearly shows where the real power is in politics as well as where Clinton’s true loyalty lies.

http://wakingtimesmedia.com/hillary-clinton-begs-forgiveness-rothschilds-leaked-email/
By-election 2016: Batley and Spen full results:

Party Candidate Votes %

Labour Party - Tracy Brabin - 17,506 - 85.8
English Democrats - Therese Hirst - 969 - 4.8
British National Party - David Furness - 548 - 2.7
Independent - Garry Kitchin - 517 - 2.5
English Independence Party - Corbyn Anti - 241 - 1.2
Liberty GB - Jack Buckby - 220 - 1.1
Independent - Henry Mayhew - 153 - 0.8
Independent (UKIP member) - Waqas Ali Khan - 118 - 0.6
National Front - Richard Edmonds - 87 - 0.4
One Love Party - Ankit Love - 34 - 0.2

Majority 16,537 81.0
Turnout 20,393 25.8

Labour hold 

 ==================================================================
NWN: A shambles.

Tuesday, October 18, 2016




WASHINGTON – “Remember, it’s a rigged system. It’s a rigged election,” said Donald Trump in New Hampshire on Saturday.
The stunned recoil in this city suggests this bunker buster went right down the chimney. As the French put it, “Il n’y a que la verite qui blesse.” It is only the truth that hurts.
In what sense is the system rigged?
Consider Big Media – the elite columnists and commentators, the dominant national press, and the national and cable networks, save Fox. Not in this writer’s lifetime has there been such blanket hatred and hostility of a presidential candidate of a major party.
“So what?” They reply. “We have a free press!”
But in this election, Big Media have burst out of the closet as an adjunct of the regime and the attack arm of the Clinton campaign, aiming to bring Trump down.
Half a century ago, Theodore White wrote of the power and bias of the “adversary press” that sought to bring down Richard Nixon.
“The power of the press in America,” wrote Teddy, “is a primordial one. It sets the agenda of public discussion; and this sweeping power is unrestrained by any law. It determines what people will talk about and think about – an authority that in other nations is reserved for tyrants, priests, parties and mandarins.”
On ABC’s “This Week,” Newt Gingrich volunteered on Sunday that, “without the unending one-sided assault of the news media, Trump would be beating Hillary by 15 points.”
On this one, Newt is right.
With all due respect, as adversaries, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are not terribly formidable. Big Media is the power that sustains the forces of globalism against those of Americanism.

What do YOU think? Irrespective of your preference, who will be next president? Sound off right now in the WND Poll!

Is the system rigged? Ask yourself.
For half a century, the U.S. Supreme Court has systematically de-Christianized and paganized American society and declared abortion and homosexual marriage constitutional rights.
Where did these unelected jurists get the right to impose their views and values upon us, and remake America in their own secularist image? Was that really the court’s role in the Constitution?
How did we wind up with an all-powerful judicial tyranny in a nation the Founding Fathers created as a democratic republic?
There are more than 11 million illegal immigrants here, with millions more coming. Yet the government consistently refuses to enforce the immigration laws of the United States.

The mask is off! Get October’s stunning pre-election Whistleblower issue, “HILLARY’S ULTIMATE WEAPON: America’s biased and abusive news media finally abandon all pretense of fairness” 

Why should those Americans whose ancestors created, fought, bled and died to preserve America not believe they and their children are being dispossessed of a country that was their patrimony – and without their consent?
When did the country vote to convert the America we grew up in into the Third World country our descendants will inherit in 2042?
In the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a congressional majority voted to end discrimination against black folks.
When did we vote to institute pervasive discrimination against white folks, especially white males, with affirmative action, quotas and racial set-asides? Even in blue states like California, affirmative action is routinely rejected in statewide ballots.
Yet it remains regime policy, embedded in the bureaucracy.

Sign the precedent-setting petition supporting Trump’s call for an independent prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton!

In 2015, in the Democratic primaries, the big enthusiastic crowds were all for 75-year-old socialist senator Bernie Sanders.
We now know, thanks to leaked emails, that not only the superdelegates and the Obama White House but a collaborationist press and the DNC were colluding to deny Sanders any chance at the nomination.
The fix was in. Ask Sanders if he thinks the system is rigged.
If there is an issue upon which Americans agree, it is that they want secure borders and an end to trade policies that have shipped abroad the jobs, and arrested the wages, of working Americans.
Yet in a private speech that netted her $225,000 from Brazilian bankers, Hillary Clinton confided that she dreams of a “common market, with open trade and open borders” from Nome, Alaska, to Patagonia.
That would mean the end of the USA as a unique, sovereign and independent nation. But the American press, whose survival depends upon the big ad dollars of transnational corporations, is more interested in old tapes of the Donald on “The Howard Stern Show.”
As present, it appears that in 2017, we may get a government headed by Hillary Clinton, and an opposition headed by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell.
Is that what the people were hoping for, working for, voting for in the primaries of 2016? Or is this what they were voting against?
Big money and the media power of the establishment elites and the transnationals may well prevail.
And if they do, Middle America – those who cling to their Bibles, bigotries and guns in Barack Obama’s depiction, those “deplorables” who are “racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic,” who are “not America” and are “irredeemable” in Hillary Clinton’s depiction – will have to accept the new regime.
But that does not mean they must love it, like it or respect it.
Because, in the last analysis, yes, Virginia, the system is rigged.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/is-the-system-rigged-you-betcha/#AmDMlZbTGq1m7Ytc.99

NWN: And which powerful minority owns almost all the 'mass media' ?  Oh yes that's right..............zionist jews. 

Monday, October 17, 2016

'All white girls are good for is sex. They're just sl*gs': Eight members of 'openly racist' violent Asian sex gang raped and 'sexually degraded' three teenage girls in Rotherham 

  • Sageer Hussain, 30, was convicted of four rapes and one indecent assault
  • Attacker told his 13-year-old victim that 'all white girls are good for is sex'
  • Elder brother Basharat was convited of indecent assault against same girl 
  • 6 other gang members found guilty of further 10 charges of sexual abuse 
Eight members of an Asian sex gang in Rotherham were today convicted of sexually exploiting teenage girls after making them suffer ‘degrading and violent’ acts.
Sageer Hussain, 30, openly boasted that he was racist and told his distraught 13-year-old white victim: ‘All white girls are good for is sex and they are just sl*gs.’
Sageer was convicted of four rapes and one indecent assault and his elder brother Basharat, 40, of indecent assault against the same girl at Sheffield Crown Court. 
Sageer Hussain
Basharat Hussain
Brothers: Sageer Hussain (left), 30, was convicted of four rapes and one indecent assault and his elder brother Basharat (right), 40, of one indecent assault against the same 13-year-old girl
Six other members of the gang were also found guilty of a further ten charges of sexually abusing the three girls – and face jail when sentenced next month.
Sageer’s victim - who is now 27 - told police, their MP and the then home secretary David Blunkett that she had been repeatedly raped by Sageer.
But the allegations were dropped after men threatened to burn down the family home and gang-rape her mother.
The clothes she was wearing when she was raped by Sageer were lost by South Yorkshire Police days later and the force later gave the girl £140 compensation.
She had a cut lip and bruised thighs and bottom but forensic samples taken from the victim at the time were not retained because the rape allegation was dropped. 
Tapes of Sageer’s 2003 police interview were also apparently destroyed.
Files belonging to the youth support group Risky Business compiled at the time of her complaint were also lost as well as phones seized during the police probe.
The girl’s family tried unsuccessfully to get help from the local social services and took the girl out of school. 
Mohammed Whied
Waleed Ali
Facing jail: Mohammed Whied (left), 32, was found guilty of one count of aiding and abetting rape, while Waleed Ali (right), 34, was found guilty of one rape and one indecent assault
She was treated by psychologists and the family were so desperate to escape her abusers they temporarily moved to Spain in 2005.
She received £20,400 in compensation from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in 2011 over her earlier rape complaint
Her father told the court previously she was a ‘lovely, happy child’ who was ‘no trouble’ until she came home with a red, swollen cheek.
She told her father she had fallen but later confessed the truth to her mother. ‘They have been raping me,’ she said.
The girl - the victim in 13 of the 16 charges - told the court Sageer hit and slapped her and held her by the hair. ‘He doesn’t like girls saying no to him,’ she said.
She kept associating with his gang out of fear. ‘You feel like scared and stuff,’ she said. ‘Sageer is like evil, mean and his friends are scared of him because of his brothers.’
Sageer was said by Michelle Colborne QC, prosecuting, to have played a ‘key role’ in the sexual abuse of girls in Rotherham who were ‘targeted and sexualised.’
His brother Basharat performed a sex act on the 13-year-old girl on multiple occasions.
Ishtiaq Khaliq
Masoued Malik
Also involved: Ishtiaq Khaliq (left), 33, was found guilty of one rape and three indecent assaults. Masoued Malik (right), 32, was found guilty of one rape, one count of conspiracy to commit indecent assault and one of false imprisonment
The Hussains were among eight men accused during the month-long trial of sexually exploiting three girls aged 13 or 14 at the time.
Girls were lured by the excitement of friendship with a group of older Asian youths and Sageer was instrumental in befriending the alleged victims.
But after a few weeks he became ‘domineering’ in his treatment of the 13-year-old girl and ‘used her for his own gratification then passed her onto his friends and older brothers or associates,’ said the prosecutor.
He was helped in differing ways by the other defendants ‘each willingly engaging in exploitative behaviour and using the girls to their own ends.’
The girl and her friends met Sageer and other older Asian boys in Rotherham town centre and they ‘became her life’.
Miss Colborne said: ‘They dressed better and seemed more approachable. Initially they were pleasant and they had fun with them.’
But the victims were soon groomed with cigarettes, alcohol and cannabis.
Asif Ali
Naeem Rafiq
Gang: Asif Ali (left), 30, was convicted of one rape, and Naeem Rafiq (right), 33, was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit indecent assault and one of false imprisonment
Her mother watched the 13-year-old turn from ‘a lovely girl to horrible and was powerless to control it,’ said Miss Colborne.
By the time she had turned 14 the girl had been repeatedly raped by Sageer in an alleyway at the side of the Boots store in Rotherham and the town’s Clifton Park.
The first time when she was still a virgin he made her look at him and told her to scream in front of his watching friends who said it would be their turn next.
The victim said Sageer had been taking drugs before the second rape in the alleyway during which he pulled her hair and grabbed her neck.
His cousin Mohammed Whied, 32, sat on his car bonnet and watched Sageer have sex with the girl in the car at Clifton Park.
‘Sageer was banging her head against the window telling her to scream and he called her a white sl*g,’ said Miss Colborne.

WHAT WERE THE 8 GANG MEMBERS CONVICTED OF?

The jury retired to consider verdicts on October 11 and today convicted all eight gang members on all counts after deliberating for almost 18 hours.
Ringleader Sageer Hussain, 30, of Clough Road, Rotherham, was convicted of four rapes and one indecent assault.
Mohammed Whied, 32, of Psalters Lane, Rotherham, was found guilty of one count of aiding and abetting rape.
Ishtiaq Khaliq, 33, of Cherry Brook, Rotherham, was found guilty of one rape and three indecent assaults.
Waleed Ali, 34, of Canklow Road, Rotherham, was found guilty of one rape and one indecent assault.
Asif Ali, 30, of Clough Road, Rotherham, was convicted on one rape.
Masoued Malik, 32, of Bridgewater Way, Rotherham, was found guilty of one rape, one count of conspiracy to commit indecent assault and one of false imprisonment.
Basharat Hussain, 40, from Goole, was convicted of one indecent assault.
And Naeem Rafiq, 33, of Clarendon Road, Rotherham, was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit indecent assault and one of false imprisonment.
They were remanded in custody for sentencing on November 4.
The fourth rape occurred when Sageer pulled the girl from Whied’s car and had sex with her in some bushes near Rotherham Museum.
She cried and he called her a ‘big baby’ before flicking cigarette ash into her hair.
She saw Sageer for the last time in Whied’s car when Sageer turned ‘nasty’ and punched her in the mouth causing it to bleed.
He set light to a can of deodorant which he waved in her face before threatening her with a crowbar.
Other Asian males, including Sageer’s brothers, goaded the 13-year-old into performing sex acts on them - once with five men at a Kosovan refugee’s flat.
In police video interviews shown to the jury, the victim said: ‘It was like we were sex objects. There was no respect or care. It was like we were there for a certain reason.’
She said an unknown Asian male once held a gun to her head in Clifton Park and told her she would be shot if she spoke to police about the sexual abuse.
‘He said if you tell anyone what’s happening, I will shoot you in three seconds. He counted down from three to one then pulled the trigger and started laughing saying there was nothing in it.’
She told why she did not pursue her 2003 allegation, saying: ‘I withdrew it because they (the police) wouldn’t give me any protection and had already lost my clothes so there was no DNA and it was my word against his.’
After her mother got threatening phone calls the family believed they were in ‘real danger’ and had a panic alarm fitted at home.
The victim finally summoned up the courage to complain again to the police in September 2013.
Sageer did not take to the witness stand in the trial but in a police interview said he used to go to the mosque every day and ‘hung about’ with his father visiting furniture and car auctions.
‘I was kicked out of school when I was 15 for messing about, my family weren’t happy,’ he said.
He claimed never to have been down the Boots alleyway or raped the complainant. Basharat denied knowing the girl. 
Speaking after the verdicts, Detective Chief Inspector Martin Tate said: ‘The verdicts today are of massive importance to the young women who have come forward to report years of horrific sexual abuse at the hands of these criminals.
‘They had to endure what no child should and have shown remarkable bravery throughout our inquiry.
‘From coming forward to officers, to providing video and written interviews, through to re-living their traumatic and awful abuse before the jury, they have carried themselves with composure and dignity.’ 
 
NWN: Here we go again. This epidemic has been going on for years, but this case 'takes the cake'. South Yorkshire Police seem to have been complicit in allowing these monsters to carry on .

Defenceless children from 'The Jungle' at Calais ?  The Coudenhove -Kalergi plan is continuing on to destroy white civilisation, and the Daily Mail hasn't the guts to state the obvious -NWN.

===============================

The first Calais 'children' arrive in Britain: Migrants who claim to be aged 14 to 17 are reunited with their families in the UK as French prepare to demolish Jungle camp 

  • First migrant children have arrived in the UK from the Calais Jungle camp 
  • Fourteen are understood to have left the northern French port today
  • They arrived at the Home Office in Croydon, south London, this afternoon
  • The youngsters will be reunited with relatives already living in Britain 

The first migrant children have arrived in Britain from Calais as a fast-track system is launched to move youngsters from the Jungle camp before it is demolished.
Fourteen children aged 14 to 17 arrived by coach at the head office of UK Visas and Immigration in Croydon, south London, to register with the Home Office.
The youngsters, who are understood to come from war-torn countries including Syria and Sudan, will be processed at the centre before they are reunited with relatives already living in Britain.
They are the first of some 100 children who are expected to make the same journey this week as French authorities prepare to raze the Jungle camp to the ground.
A boy is escorted to the Home Office branch in Croydon, south London, after arriving from the Calais Jungle camp. Some 14 youngsters are believed to have made the journey today
A boy is escorted to the Home Office branch in Croydon, south London, after arriving from the Calais Jungle camp. Some 14 youngsters are believed to have made the journey today
The youngsters (one pictured) are the first of dozens of children who are expected to make the same journey this week as French authorities prepare to raze the Jungle camp to the ground
The youngsters (one pictured) are the first of dozens of children who are expected to make the same journey this week as French authorities prepare to raze the Jungle camp to the ground
The children, one boy pictured, will be reunited with relatives already living in Britain
The children, one boy pictured, will be reunited with relatives already living in Britain
A team of British officials were sent to Calais to help French officials speed up the transfer of minors ahead of the demolition.
An EU regulation allows children with close relatives in the UK to seek asylum. A number of other 'at-risk' unaccompanied children are also allowed following an amendment to the immigration law that was passed in May.  
A Home Office spokesman said 'essential checks' have been carried out on these young people, including security checks, verifying their ages and confirming their identities and eligibility to come to the UK. 
The youngsters now face further screening by the Home Office before they are reunited with family members. Some might be housed in specialist accommodation while these safeguarding checks take place, the spokesman said.  
A Home Office spokesman said: 'This is the start of the process to transfer as many eligible children as possible before the start of the clearance, as the Home Secretary set out in Parliament.' 
Chef Asif Khan, 25, said his 14-year-old brother Aimal was among those who arrived today. The brothers have not seen each other for more than a decade after Asif fled their home in Afghanistan.  
Supporters welcomed the group's arrival but warned there was still work to be done
Supporters welcomed the group's arrival but warned there was still work to be done
Two of the youngsters are escorted off the bus and taken to the Home Office office
Two of the youngsters are escorted off the bus and taken to the Home Office office
A man smiles with one of two unidentified young migrants as they arrive in Britain by coach
A man smiles with one of two unidentified young migrants as they arrive in Britain by coach

WHAT THE LAW SAYS

The law which governs EU asylum claims states migrants should claim asylum in the first EU country reached. 
However there is a clause which allows minors to apply for asylum in another European country if they already have family living there.  
Lord Dubs, who came to Britain on the Kindertransport programme for Jewish children fleeing Nazi Germany, brought an amendment to the Immigration Act which was passed in May. 
This states the UK will take 'vulnerable unaccompanied child refugees' who arrived in the EU before March 20. 
These child refugees must be travelling on their own and fleeing conflict in their home country. Exceptions also apply to children under 13, girls and orphans. 
More than 80 unaccompanied children have so far been accepted to Britain under EU asylum law this year, according to the Home Office. 
It is not yet clear how many children will be accepted from Calais this week, although some figures suggest it will be around 100. 
Asif, who has lived in Britain for 11 years, said he is simply looking forward to giving his little brother a hug. 
He said: 'I really appreciate this. My brother was in Calais for the last six months. 
'It was a blessing to receive him from there. I’m really happy. His journey was so difficult, it was by walking, by bus to Calais. 
'He gets a new life now, because there are many people who died in Calais.' 
The group's arrival was welcomed by the charity Citizens UK, which said it has reunited 60 children from Calais with relatives in Britain since March. 
An estimated 1,000 unaccompanied children are currently living in the Jungle of which around 180 have been identified as having family ties to Britain. 
Lord Dubs, whose amendment to the Immigration Act 2016 requires the Government to relocate unaccompanied refugee children from Europe, said: 'In the coming days, Citizens UK's Safe Passage team will be working round the clock to ensure that all children with a legal right to sanctuary in the UK are brought to safety.
'This includes the children eligible under the Dubs amendment, for whom there is still no official process in place. No child must be left behind in the chaos of demolition.'
He added: 'Looking ahead we must never allow a repeat of Calais. The Government must learn lessons from this situation and realise that it has a duty to make the Dublin mechanism work across Europe, as well as establishing a clear procedure for children without family eligible for sanctuary under the Dubs amendment.'
A boy looks out of the bus window as he arrives at the Home Office in Croydon, south London
A boy looks out of the bus window as he arrives at the Home Office in Croydon, south London
A team of British officials were sent to Calais to help French officials speed up the transfer of minors ahead of the demolition of the migrant Jungle camp. Pictured, a boy in London today
A team of British officials were sent to Calais to help French officials speed up the transfer of minors ahead of the demolition of the migrant Jungle camp. Pictured, a boy in London today
UK Border Force staff escort the first group of unaccompanied minors to the Home Office
UK Border Force staff escort the first group of unaccompanied minors to the Home Office
Actress Juliet Stevenson said it was a 'proud moment' for Britain.
She added: 'We did the right thing. The arrival of hundreds of vulnerable children from Calais to the UK in the coming days is in no small part due to the tireless campaigning of community leaders, the hard work of Citizens UK's lawyers, and the Safe Passage team in Calais who have been working to safeguard children for over a year.
'Many children will sleep safely in warm beds tonight but in the coming days we must make sure every last child with a right to sanctuary here is brought to safety.'
Campaigners say they have identified hundreds of children in the camp who have a right to come to the UK, either because they have family ties here under the so-called Dublin regulations, or through the Dubs amendment.
The Government has faced criticism over efforts to identify and transfer youngsters. Pictured, some of the unaccompanied children  arriving at the Home Office centre in south London
The Government has faced criticism over efforts to identify and transfer youngsters. Pictured, some of the unaccompanied children  arriving at the Home Office centre in south London
One young man clapped as he stepped off the bus in London after the journey from Calais
A young migrant claps as he is escorted off a coach
One young man clapped as he stepped off the bus in London after the journey from Calais
The children have been moved as the French authorities prepare to demolish the Jungle
The children have been moved as the French authorities prepare to demolish the Jungle
Border Force staff were on hand to escort the youngsters from the coach to the office
Border Force staff were on hand to escort the youngsters from the coach to the office
The Government has faced criticism over efforts to identify and transfer youngsters through the routes.
Last week Home Secretary Amber Rudd told the Commons that more than 80 unaccompanied children had been accepted for transfer under the Dublin regulation so far this year.
Under the rule, asylum claims must be made in the first safe country a person reaches but children can have their application transferred to another country if they have family members living there.
The Home Secretary also said that more than 50 children had been taken, largely from Greece, under Lord Dubs' amendment to the Immigration Act. 
Former Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams said he is 'delighted' to welcome the children to the UK, but cautioned that this is the first step and more children need help urgently. 
Former Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams speaks to the media today
Former Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams speaks to the media today
The Home Office centre at Lunar House in Croydon, south London, where the migrants arrived
The Home Office centre at Lunar House in Croydon, south London, where the migrants arrived

Soldiers on the streets - It's been happening for years