Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Thought criminal Germar Rudolf--Letter from prison


Friends,

I received another letter, dated July 17, 2007, from Germar Rudolf, the imprisoned German scientist and Holocaust revisionist scholar.

His forensic studies of the so-called "Auschwitz gas chambers" proved beyond a reasonable doubt that they never existed.

The current German government cannot disprove his thesis with contrary evidence and logic, so they had no recourse but to put him into prison. By their oppressive behavior, the current German rulers have shown themselves to be a Jewish-Zionist inspired, totalitarian despotism, masquerading as a "democracy."

Anyhow, here are some of the contents of the letter.

Overall, he appears to be in a good mood, albeit somewhat justifiably hostile and combative.

1. In regard to his physical fitness issues, ! he writes that "things look bright right now." His wife sent him a pair of running shoes, and he feels good running to stay in good physical condition.

2. Despite the fact that he keeps his cell meticulously clean, he has "to kill a cockroach a day," because the other inmates do not have his habits of cleanliness.

3. He is justifiably angry at the prison authorities. I quote directly from the letter: "Last week the prison authorities forbade me to call the residence of a lady at the Lake Constance... Some clerk in this...[prison] ...found an entry on a Wikepedia site claiming that some ancestor of that lady had some official position during the years 1933-1945, and this was reason enough for the prison head to declare that this lady endangers my resocialization. ..On top of it, that lady was banned from visiting me for the same reasons."

4. The prison authorities put the same bans upon a supporter! of his, because some clerk found out that he is a member of some unspecified organization.

5. In a short, justifiable denunciation of the current German authorities, he mentions the "chemical residues in the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz."

6. After experiencing these problems, he had a talk with the prison psychologist. I quote directly from his letter: "I had it and told the psychologist, who had an interview with me today in order to assess how my prospects for social reintegration would be, to pack his stuff and get off my back with his pack of hypocrisy and lies. Which is equivalent to saying that I won't get an early release."

10. He states that he has two remaining years left on his sentence, and he refuses to be brain washed.

Again I quote directly from his letter: "Well, I'll wing those two remaining years--exactly on this very day [July 17, 2007]--somehow. Worse things could happen.!

At least I'm going to be in one piece, healthy, and still the old guy, with backbone unbroken and brain unwashed. That's more important than a few months sooner out of here."

11. He gave me permission to spread the information in this letter over the Internet.

I quote directly from his letter: "Of course you can spread this message far and wide. Serves them well the world knows what a nuthouse Germany has become."

Germar Rudolf is a fine human being. It is a great honor for me to be his friend and colleague.

You too can write to him at: Germar Rudolf &! nbsp; Herzogenriedstr. 111 D-68169 Mannheim Germany

Paul Grubach

BNP fined for not submitting accounts
We have the above exclusive picture of the BNP auditors; Silver & Co., doing the BNP accounts, (the pic was taken secretly).
There is a certainty that this 'unhelpful' discussion in SFUK will be deleted by Nick Griffins so helpful STORMFRONT administrator :Andy Robertson/JohnJoyTree, in the very near future.
Comments welcomed here though .................

Monday, July 30, 2007


Chris Jackson at last weeks BNP Leadership count !


Bush jokes about WMD ! Over 18's only...

: God's Creation


On the first day, God created the dog and said: "Sit all day by the door of your house and bark at anyone who comes in or walks past.
For this, I will give you a life span of twenty years."
The dog said: "That's a long time to be barking. How about only ten years and I'll give you back the other ten?" So God agreed.
On the second day, God created the monkey and said: "Entertain people, do tricks, and make them laugh. For this, I'll give you a twenty-year life span."
The monkey said: "Monkey tricks for twenty years? That's a pretty long time to perform. How about I give you back ten like the dog did?" And God agreed.
On the third day, God created the cow and said: "You must go into the field with the farmer all day long and suffer under the sun, have calves and give milk to support the farmer's family For this, I will give you a life span of sixty years."
The cow said: "That's kind of a tough life you want me to live for sixty years. How about twenty and I'll give back the other forty?" And God agreed again.
On the fourth day, God created man and said: "Eat, sleep, play, marry and enjoy your life. For this, I'll give you twenty years."
But man said: "Only twenty years? Could you possibly give me my twenty, the forty the cow gave back, the ten the monkey gave back, and the ten the dog gave back; that makes eighty, okay?" "Okay," said God, "You asked for it."
So that is why for our first twenty years we eat, sleep, play and enjoy ourselves. For the next forty years we slave in the sun to support our family. For the next ten years we do monkey tricks to entertain the grandchildren. And for the last ten years we sit on the front porch and bark at everyone. Life has now been explained to you...
Jack in Rochdale

Sunday, July 29, 2007

Leading BNP Member Resigns...

Leading BNP member resigns...

From Jonathan Bowden to Nick Griffin

Dear NG,

during the middle of Saturday afternoon the party head of security, Martin Reynolds, texted me to inform me that Tommy William’s tendentious and lying filth about me had been taken down.

It appears that not only is this not the case but the criminal abuse has got ten times worse.

I have given a lot of time and effort to this party over the last 4 years. I am now being accused repeatedly of being a paedophile on the Internet by one of your quote unquote old mates.

I am sick and tired of the human scum and vermin which proliferate in such shallows waters.

To be accused of being a child abuser is amongst the lowest thing that can possibly be imagined.

T o even refute such allegations from criminal psychopaths like these is beneath one’s dignity.

None the less, I REFUTE EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEIR LIES AS DISTASTFUL GARBAGE.

I will seek to have police action carried out against this vile Internet site, but I also intend to resign as cultural officer, advisory council member and member of the BNP.

I do not wish to associate-even tangentially-with such low-grade lycanthropes and psychotic criminals.

Williams, I gather, is a convicted drug dealer and career criminal with a string of convictions.

I have many other and better things to do with my life in future.

The stench of this rabble, lumpen and canaille is displeasing to me. I shall devote myself to the world of the arts from which I originate and to which I shall return.

Yours ever

Jonathan Bowden

PS The overwhelming majority of people in the BNP are decent and patriotic types. I have enjoyed my association with many of them and wish them every success in the future.

Fight to rid Griffin of BNP leadership to be 'stepped up' !


We understand that apart from ourselves, many other people within and without the BNP, are to step up the campaign to rid us of a tyrant.


There does seem to be a 'ground swell' too and growing of disposition leading to anger and revolt against Nick Griffin.
There are of course many reasons for this..........deceit, lies , arrogance..........you name it, Griffin has got it.
We have also noted that the Griffin apologists are arguing again that Lord Nick could have gotten a job easily with his Cambridge degree.
What ignorant nonsense !
Griffin only got a 'third class degree', we understand. That is a degree that means a failure to other 'grads', like this current writer, and academia in general. Most others who only 'gain a third' , do not turn up for their ceremony due to their total embarassment.
Nick Griffin was a part time woodcutter when John Tyndall foolishly took him on to write for SPEARHEAD magazine. We also understand, according to another source, he was a shelfstacker in a local supermarket.
Griffin, like Tony 'Wells'Lecomber, are unemployable.
So, to suggest that he would have made £millions, if he had joined the Establishment parties, is nonsense.
You do not know the man. This writer, unfortunately, knows him only too well !


Saturday, July 28, 2007


BNP LEADER VISITS STOKE-ON-TRENT FUNERAL


British National Party leader Nick Griffin visited Stoke-on-Trent to attend the funeral of a man killed in a street brawl.

Mr Griffin, pictured, joined local BNP councillors yesterday at the funeral of Keith Brown, in Blurton.


Mr Brown, aged 53, died after being stabbed in an incident in his street, Uttoxeter Road, Normacot, pictured, on July 6. Mr Griffin said he had been invited to the funeral service, at St Bartholomew's Church, in Church Lane, by Mr Browns family.


"The family had said they would like a BNP presence at the funeral, and that Keith would have liked a BNP presence and a good send-off," said Mr Griffin. "Mr Brown was not a BNP member, but he was a sympathetic member of the public," he added Mr Brown's neighbour, Habib Khan, aged 49, has been charged with his murder.

Friday, July 27, 2007



Service to say goodbye to murdered BNP activist
27th July 2007News article filed by BNP news team

Striking floral tributes from family and friends
Keith Brown will not be forgotten

The funeral of BNP activist Keith Brown was held in Blurton, Stoke-on-Trent yesterday (26th). As Keith’s coffin was driven to St Bartholomew’s chapel over one hundred British National Party supporters were waiting outside in the pouring rain.Keith was murdered earlier this month in his own garden in front of his family; a victim of a brutal racist attack carried out by a gang of Muslim thugs. At the specific request of his widow, six Stoke BNP councillors carried his coffin into the church; there was no sound other than that of greenfinches and goldfinches singing in the conifers in the church yard.
Inside the church there was not enough room and as people stood at the back of the church where rain was pouring through holes in the roof, many remained outside unable to get in.The service itself was short with the vicar referring to the fact that the church was full and how that must have given great strength to the family.
Outside the church one journalist from a local TV station interviewed BNP Chairman, Nick Griffin and to the amazement and disgust of those gathered around, referring to the tense atmosphere that exists in Stoke between native Britons and the Islamic newcomers, actually asked him if his presence was actually making matters worse.
At the solemn internment service in Longton, amongst the many floral tributes was a beautiful and striking St George cross sent by Burnley & Padiham BNP.
Nationalists have long memories and nobody attending the service will ever forget the sight and sound of Keith’s young children crying out for their murdered father.
For this is life on the frontline of multiracial Britain and unfortunately Keith will not be the last to be taken from us in such circumstances. Those politicians and their politically-correct media lackeys who make their living selling Keith and his countrymen and women into multiculturalism would do well to enjoy the fruits of their sordid and treasonous exploits while they still can.
Goodbye Keith, the manner you were taken from us was horrific and brutal but now may you rest in peace.
You will be remembered always.
Donations and messages of support to Keith’s family can be sent to:P.O Box 2641, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffs.ST3 9AS

Thursday, July 26, 2007



BNP leadership election result
Nick 'Mugabe' Griffin 90%
Chris Jackson 10%
A very low vote as a percentage of BNP members was seen to be the case. What a farce it all was ,and very reminiscent of a 'tinpot dictatorship' in the Congo. How Griffin can go to the Country as a 'bone fide' leader of a political party in the UK at election time, would need some chutzpah !
The fight goes on !


Getting wealthier? Too many eggs in the housing basket

With manufacturing and jobs being outsourced we will be left as peons
in overpriced brick boxes, we might just be able to eke out a living selling Charles and Diana
mugs to wealthy Chinese tourists.Are the capitalists just stupid and motivated
by short term greed ?
'Sir' Pigby Jones of the CBI seems to epitomise the vices of the breed.

Tony
-----------------------------
Daily Telegraph

Houses 'account for 60pc of the UK's wealth'

Houses now make up three fifths of Britain's wealth, the
highest proportion recorded, according to the latest official figures,
demonstrating our increasing reliance on the value of our properties.

Residential property totalled an astonishing £3,915 billion last
year, figures published by the Office of National Statistics yesterday
showed. This accounted for 60 per cent of the nation's total net worth
of £6,525 billion.

During most of the 1990s, houses made up less than half the nation's
total value and even back in 1987 - when the ONS first started
compiling these figures and when we were in the grip of a house price boom -
residential properties made up just 52 per cent of Britain's total
worth.

The total value of Britain's housing stock increased by 10 per cent
last year, a sharp increase on the previous year, when the value
climbed by less than four per cent.

The official figures have yet to reflect increasing concerns among
economists that the housing market is about to come off the boil after
12 months of very strong growth.

Yesterday, Rightmove, the country's biggest online estate agent,
said the average asking price in England and Wales had gained just 0.3 per
cent compared to the previous month - the slowest pace so far this
year.

The ONS figures have been published as part of the Capital Stocks
publication - an annual checklist of the wealth of the nation which
tots up the value of private properties as well as company and Government
assets.

The value of the British residential property equates to £162,000
for each household - below the figures published by the Halifax, Britain's
biggest mortgage lender, which reckons the average house is worth
nearly £200,000.

However, the ONS figures include one-bedroom flats whereas Halifax
concentrates solely on houses.

The figures also show that, despite Gordon Brown's plans to sell
£48 billion worth of Government assets - from embassy buildings to other
treasures - the value of central Government's buildings, machinery and
vehicles continues to climb steadily. In total the Government owns
£686 billion worth of assets - or £23,000 for each taxpayer.

Wealth of a Nation
£3,915billion of residential property £613billion of factory machinery and companies’ equipment £334 billion of local government buildings £161 billion of ships, aircraft
and other vehicles £54 billion of farm land and buildings £38billion
of kitchen gadgets, TVs and other household machines
Daily Telegraph

Record numbers work past retirement age

The number of people working past the state pension age is
higher than ever before, according to the latest figures.

Men over the age of 65 and women over 60 account for record numbers
of people taking up new jobs, a survey by the Office for National
Statistics has found.

The figures showed that people above the pension age, 65 for men and
60 for women, make up just under half of the 180,000 people who were
hired over the last year.

There are an estimated 1.2 million people of pensionable age in
work, of which two thirds are women.

Experts have attributed the rise to growing concerns over the
pensions crisis and many older people feel obliged to take up menial jobs.

At the same time, fewer employers are offering their workers
incentives to leave early, while so-called "golden handshake" payments
leading up to retirement are increasingly rare. About 11 per cent of
people above the pension age are now thought to be working compared
with just eight per cent in the mid 1990s.

Chris Ball, chief executive of The Age and Employment Network, said:
"Our impression is that many people are accepting jobs below their
qualifications and capabilities, often out of economic necessity. This
remains a waste of important resources and is, frankly, demeaning to
older people."

Sam Mercer, chief executive of the Employers Forum on Age, said
employers were more willing to take on older workers following the
introduction of anti-age discrimination laws last October.
She added: "As people live longer there is a realisation that they
can't afford a 30-year retirement."

A must read from the USA !



New Hampshire couple evade death and taxes
The Browns have been holed up, refusing to pay the IRS or go to prison.
It's a battle that might end in bloodshed.
Plainfield, N.H. — SHE sits on the lookout in a lawn chair on their front porch, her forehead glossy with sweat, Bible next to her left foot, wind chimes clinking at her back.
Her husband of 24 years is by her side, German shepherd at his knee, handgun tucked beneath the belt on his jeans.
High in these humid hills, Ed and Elaine Brown have been holed up in their home for six months, refusing to serve a five-year prison sentence for tax evasion. They all but dared law officials to come and get them. This, they say, is a fight they're ready to die for."Show me the law!" says Ed, a trim 64-year-old with a silver mustache, whose forehead crinkles when he gets heated.
The Browns stopped paying income taxes in 1996. They say the Constitution and Supreme Court decisions support their claims that ordinary labor cannot be taxed.
But a judge ruled against them in January, convicting the Browns of conspiring to evade paying taxes on $1.9 million in income from Elaine's dentistry practice.
Now, the Browns say they're in a battle for freedom, and it just might end in bloodshed right here, in a towering turreted house with 8-inch-thick concrete walls and an American flag fluttering over the double-car garage.
They have garnered national support, with blogs devoted to news about the standoff and supporters regularly showing up on the couple's doorstep with groceries.
Government and law officials have cut off power, Internet, house phone, cellphone, television and mail service to the couple's 110-acre compound.
But their house is equipped with solar panels, a watchtower, a satellite dish and a stockpile of food. "We are self-sustained like a ship," Ed says. "We don't need power from the shore to run the ship."
FBI agents are trying to avoid a deadly shootout reminiscent of Waco, Texas, or Ruby Ridge, Idaho.
They have tried negotiating, waiting, begging. "We are proceeding carefully to make sure no one gets hurt," says U.S. Marshal Stephen Monier, the lead officer handling the siege. "We are aware that there are guns in there." Monier says the couple broke the law and should turn themselves in peacefully. "They have been tried and convicted and sentenced."
But the Browns aren't budging. "You remember that little gentleman in China, Tiananmen Square?" Ed says, peering through his sunglasses.
"He was the same as we are. You can scare me, you can kill me, but you can't intimidate me." "We're fighting for you, your country," adds Elaine, 66, a calm woman with short, wavy dark hair. "This isn't just taxes.""There's no more America," Ed says. "It's already gone."
"I'll die fighting, rather than live in slavery," Elaine says. "I'll tell you that."
THE mountain air outside the Browns' home is hot and thick with flies.
On the shaded front porch overlooking a small duck pond, a visitor in a straw hat — who drove his pickup truck for two days from Texas to meet the Browns — eats grapes out of a paper bag and flips through an issue of Shotgun News magazine. He introduces himself as Doug. His last name is Tibbetts, he says, "like that guy who dropped the bomb on Hiroshima."
Another guest, who refuses to give his name and makes it a point to tell everyone he is armed, drove here from Massachusetts. He talks about illegal immigration and government corruption in a slow deep drip of a voice that seems to irritate Ed, who frequently cuts him off.
The government, Ed says, is at a point of "communism in its purist form."Elaine nods.
"It's not communism though," says the Massachusetts man. "It's totalitarianism."
"It's Marxism," interjects Tibbetts, 60.
"No, no, no, guys, guys, don't give me that," says Ed, raising his voice. "I've done 15 years of research here."
Since the standoff began, the Browns' home has turned into a commune for anti-government activists.
Admirers from across the country make their way to the secluded home on Center of Town Road in Plainfield, population 2,200, in a state where license plates carry the motto "Live Free or Die."
To get to the Browns' house, travelers ascend along a jagged gravel and dirt road, stopping at a silver sign nailed to a tree trunk on the couple's property, which warns: "If not friendly, Go, Go Away!"
Unable to telephone the Browns and notify them of their arrival, some visitors proceed slowly down the long driveway or attach small flags to their trucks to show that they've come in peace.
The guests often come bearing gifts: hamburger buns, ginger ale, cellphones with prepaid minutes, gun ammunition.
Someone gave the Browns their German shepherd, named Zoey.
The visitors pitch tents in the Browns' yard or sleep inside the house.
Some bring laptops from which they manage the Browns' blog and MySpace page, both created by volunteers. Shaun Kranish, 21, of Rockford, Ill., read about the Browns online earlier this year.
In March, he drove to New Hampshire and spent a few nights at their home talking about politics and freedom. A gun rights advocate, he started a website, MaketheStand.com, devoted to the couple's battle.
He has solicited rechargeable flashlights and candles for the Browns and helped promote concerts supporting them.
People back the Browns, he says, because they are standing against everything that is wrong with government. "It's about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan," Kranish says. "It's about the truth about the 9/11 attacks…. They're saying, 'We're not going to be a part of it; we're not going to fund it.' "
There are 250,000 to 500,000 people in the United States who are tax protesters, says JJ MacNab, a financial analyst who has written a book on the issue and testified before Congress on behalf of law enforcement.
Some, she says, are elderly, uneducated or disenfranchised people who buy into tax evasion scams. Others are disgruntled — sometimes dangerous — citizens who believe the wording of tax laws does not make them liable to pay.
"The tax laws are almost 100 years old, and no one has ever won," she says. "Thousands and thousands of people have challenged them. It's a constant flow of the same tired arguments over and over."MacNab says the Internet has connected Iraq war veterans, college students, minorities and women to the tax protest movement, which was once associated mostly with white supremacists and militia groups that held meetings at local diners.
Supporters have hailed the Browns as heroes, akin to Gandhi and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., which has made law enforcement officials cautious about turning them into martyrs.
"There are lots of people that want it to be over," says Stephen Halleran, Plainfield's town administrator. "They feel Ed and Elaine need to play by the same rules as the rest of us."Halleran says the Browns have always had strong beliefs, but they haven't been considered dangerous until now.
Residents are anxious, he says, because of the steady stream of out-of-towners — white supremacists, anarchists and other activists — roaming through Plainfield and showing up at community meetings. Neighbors with children worry about what could happen if the standoff ends in gunfire.
MacNab, who has studied tax protesters since 1997, says some supporters of the Browns have compiled a list of enemies — including judges and journalists — and their families. People have warned that if the couple die, retaliatory killings will follow.
MacNab has little faith the Browns will turn themselves in without a fight."I think there's going to be death and violence," she says. "I don't see it happening another way.
"THE way the Browns see it, they skirted a bloodbath on June 7.That was the day their compound was surrounded by armed officers, armored vehicles, state police cruisers, trucks and roadblocks.
Law officials say the showing of force was intended for surveillance of the compound while its agents seized Elaine's dental practice a town away. A houseguest of the Browns noticed the convoy while walking Zoey.
The Browns believe that a confrontation between the houseguest and law enforcement helped them avert an attack.
"Whenever we go into the vicinity, we go in a manner to ensure the community is protected and the officers are protected," says Monier, the marshal. He added that law enforcement conducted surveillance on the Brown compound "from time to time."Elaine doesn't buy it: "We know they were on their way in to kill us that day."
Two weeks later, Randy Weaver, whose wife and child were killed in Ruby Ridge 15 years ago, held a news conference at the Browns' home, in which he vowed to stand with them."What makes people willing to put their lives on the line?" said Weaver, holding up a picture of his late son for reporters.
"They'll take so much B.S. from the so-called government, the de facto government, that they just say, Back off. This is just what has happened right here."It was the Ruby Ridge siege, along with his brewing anger over paying taxes, that inspired Ed to rebel.
In 1992, U.S. marshals converged on Weaver's remote mountain cabin to arrest him on a federal weapons trafficking charge. A marshal shot and killed Weaver's teenage son. In another gun battle a marshal was killed. The next day, an FBI sharpshooter shot Weaver, then fatally shot his wife, Vicki, as she was holding the couple's baby girl.
A year later, Branch Davidian leader David Koresh and his followers were engaged in a 51-day standoff with federal agents surrounding their compound in Waco, Texas. Ed watched it all on television.
Federal agents were trying to carry out search and arrest warrants against Koresh because of reports that his group was stockpiling illegal weapons.
In a shootout, four agents were killed and 20 others injured. The siege ended with a raging fire. When it was over, 82 Branch Davidian members were dead.
"I was calling him the Waco wacko at the time," says Ed, "and I said, 'Wait a minute, they're planning to go in and kill these people.' You can't do that. Now they lost me. Now I was angry."
The events at Ruby Ridge and Waco energized conspiracy theorists and anti-government activists, including the bomber of the Oklahoma City federal building, Timothy J. McVeigh.
Ed focused his fury on the Internal Revenue Service."It affected so many people," he says. "The IRS is the most brutal, ruthless organization out of all there is."INSIDE their home, Elaine boils hot dogs over a gas stove. Sunlight shines through windows offering the only light. The dim kitchen is cooler than outside. The shelves are lined with plastic containers of dry beans, bottles of hot sauce, bags of potato chips, a can of Folgers coffee, a watermelon.
A bouquet of pink and blue daisies sits on the table, near a copy of the local newspaper featuring an article about the Browns.There is a rumble in the driveway. Zoey begins to bark. Everyone runs to the front window."Check the side door!" Ed yells to Elaine. It's just a visitor with a flag on his truck. He stopped by to tell the Browns that he, too, has stopped paying taxes."You must understand," says Ed, sitting in his rocking chair, "this is personal for each and every one of us."
He brings up how law officials have bullied him and harassed his wife.
He becomes flustered when he recalls his wife being handcuffed when she was arrested for tax evasion.
"This is American, what he's talking," Tibbetts says. "This is what made America. Not sitting back and getting abused. Standing up for what's right. Standing up for what God gave you."
Elaine offers Tibbetts another hot dog."There's two freight trains going just like this toward each other," Ed says.
"So you better take a side, buddy, because when they hit, it's going to be hellacious."And," he says, "it all could start right here."

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

So Council tax revaluation officers want to charge us more if we live in a nice area.

That ought to mean discounts for those of us who live in rough areas.

We have a huge council house in our street.

The extended family is run by a grumpy old woman with a pack of fierce dogs.

Her car isn't taxed or insured, and doesn't even have a number plate, but the police still do nothing.

Her bad tempered old man is famous for upsetting foreigners with racist comments.

A shopkeeper blames him for ordering the murder of his son and his sons girlfriend, but nothing has been proven yet.

All their kids have broken marriages except the youngest, who everyone thought was gay.

Two grandsons are meant to be in the Army but are always seen out in nightclubs.

The family's odd antics are always in the papers.


They are out of control. ..........


Honestly -


who'd live near Windsor Castle? :-)

from Jack

Tuesday, July 24, 2007




Wigan Labour Party corruption

Manx Man said:
Wigan Council has been rocked by two scandals' in the space of a few days.The former Chairman of Wigan Labour Party,Dorothy Abbott, has pleaded guilty to Benefit Fraud to the tune of £28,500, and has been told the she could face prison if found guilty.
A few days later the headlines of the local newspaper, ran an article about Councillor Joe Shaw.His home in Standish was raided by Police officer's who upon entering the premises, took away Councilor Shaw's computer, which allegedly contained images of child pornography.
Councillor Shaw was not at home at the time, so police officer's went to Wigan Town hall and detained Councillor Shaw as he left a council meeting .
Councillor Shaw represents the Wigan West ward of Wigan council and was elected in 2006.
The Wigan Labour party is 'rotten to the core' and Dorothy Abbott is involved with Wigan and Leigh United against Racism, a front group for the Anti Nazi League.
If Councillor Shaw is charged with this offence, I am sure his electorate would not want a peadophile as their Councilor.

Monday, July 23, 2007




The funeral of Mr Keith Brown


The funeral of Stoke-on-Trent BNP activist Keith Brown will be held on Thursday 26th July at 1.45pm.


Keith's family have requested a large BNP presence at the funeral, as this is what Keith would have wanted.


The service will be held at St Bartholomews Church, Church Road, Blurton, Stoke on Trent, Staffs.
Please dress smartly (eg. white shirt & black tie) and bring along smart, clean St George or Union flags on poles to fly in his honour. Please try to be at the church no later than 1.30pm.
.

Sunday, July 22, 2007


Nick Griffin now screwing with 'Voice of Freedom' sales figures !


I haven't read the Voice of Freedom for many a year. When Griffin changed it from British Nationalist, I continued to read it.


Then they put some wog in, and gave him his own section.


What is this, thought I ?


Griffin is welcoming non-whites, but expelling long serving British nationalists ?


News tells us that Oldham are almost at the top of sales of VOF in the latest issue ?


Oldham has been buggered, since long gone idiot Mick Treacy pushed for his mate Nick Griffin to stand in Oldham in 2001 for a Parliamentary election.


This writer was the first Oldham BNP Organiser , albeit under duress.


We, Chris Jackson and I, handed Oldham over to Treacy.
Only last week, Dicky Barnbrook spoke in Oldham, and was unpleasently surprised to see that a former BNP stronghold was in a veritable mess.

Saturday, July 21, 2007

Problems with blogger folks !
Posts are taking a while to be published.

Friday, July 20, 2007




Catholic Herald article on Islamists
"Dear Bob",
Thank you for forwarding me another anti-Islamic polemic, this time published in the Catholic Herald, which I think is pubished in Britain.
It does not surprise me that a Catholic newspaper publishes such stuff since I have noted that elements in and around the Roman Catholic Church in Britain have become, simultaneously, ardently pro-Jewish/pro-Israel and heavily into anti-Islamism.
There are a number of Christian journalists who sponsor this line, the majority of whom are Catholics.
The majority of these turn out to have Jewish wives and surround themselves with Jewish staff.
I am preparing a new issue of my 'Electronic Watch on Zion' e-bulletin in which I will focus on this topic.
In the meanwhile, may I draw your attention to various comments which I have inserted into the Catholic Herald article which you sent to me, which I hope you think are apposite and fair.
Kind regards,
Martin.(Martin Webster)===========================================================
From: Robert Reis To: John Bryant Date: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:15 AMSubject: From The Catholic Herald<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/authors.asp?ID=4209>
Catholic Herald - 18th July 2007
"Jihad Will Destroy Us If We Don't Act Now"by Ed West*
Academics don't write books with titles like The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World's Most Intolerant Religion and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (And the Crusades) without expecting some harsh criticism, and Robert Spencer has heard it all.
"The major death threat came from Adam Gadahn of al-Qaeda," he says.
In a September 2006 video Gadahn invited Spencer and various other "Zionist crusader missionaries of hate and counter-Islam consultants" to "abandon their unbelief and repent and enter into the light of Islam and turn their swords against the enemies of God."That is, in the gang mentality of fundamentalist Islam, an offer you can't refuse. "The problem is, inviting me to join up is a veiled threat in itself," Spencer explains. "According to traditional Islamic law, the invitation to Islam, if refused, becomes a mandate to wage war against the one who refuses."He turned down the generous offer and instead suggested that Gadahn accept the Bill of Rights, but Spencer is now no stranger to FBI patrols outside his home.
Since 2001 America's leading Catholic scholar of Islam has written a series of studies that have, despite almost total media silence, sold in enormous quantities. These titles include Inside Islam: A Guide for Catholics (with Daniel Ali) and Onward Muslim Soldiers: How Jihad Still Threatens America and the West.[MW: how does this unsubstantiated assertion about "almost total media silence" stand in contrast with the verifiable facts given in the following paragraph? One does not get to the top of the New York Times bestsellers list without substantial promotion from somewhere. His assertion, later in this article, that he owes all his best-selling status solely to informal promotion via the Internet, is not credible. The book-publishing and book-selling industry in the USA is almost wholly dominated by the Jews, as are the newspaper and broadcasting media -- indeed, the same Jewish-owned corporations have holdings in all media fields. Spencer would find it very hard to get his books published (unless he were a millionaire or a former US President) if the ideas which they expressed did not chime with the Jewish anti-Islam line created to sustain and justify Jewish genocidal activity in Palestine. The idea that those who produce anti-Islamic polemics are the victims of 'politcally correct' persecution by the media is not merely untrue, it is the reverse of the truth. Such persecution is, however, inflicted on anti-Zionists and "anti-semites". Look at the treatment accorded by the media and Jewish pressure groups in the USA to former President Jimmy Carter's recent book about the true nature of the Zionist state. Is Carter a "neo-Nazi anti-semite"? "Yes", acccording to his vengeful ADL/AIPAC detractors.]
Both The Truth About Muhammad and the Politically Incorrect Guide reached the New York Times bestsellers list. He has also amassed an enormous following on the website Jihad Watch (http://www.jihadwatch.org/), a monitor of global Islamist activity that receives a million visitors a month. [Emphasis added by MW] Being a leading expert on Islamist violence, Spencer is understandably cautious about discussing his personal life or background in print. What is known is that he hails from a partly Greek Orthodox background [emphasis added by MW] and began his study of the Koran in 1980 while finishing his MA in Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina. He was studying Patristic Christology but was in "spiritual search mode" when he stumbled upon the Muslim holy book.[MW: Could it be that the source of Spencer's hostility to Islam and Muslims is his Greek ancestry? Greece was for hundreds of years occupied by the Turkish Ottoman Empire, as were large parts of the Balkans, to the north. Greek hatred of the Turks is hard-wired into the Greek soul, a fact which I discovered in conversation with the Greek husband of one of my sisters. This impression was confirmed during my tour of Greece last year. This hatred of Islam and Muslim people is matched in the Balkans. With 400 years of Christian/Muslim strife to draw on, the Serb military and para-military organisations' massacres of Muslim civilians were as vile as anything perpetrated during the Ottoman Empire. Muslims do not have a monopoly of religious intolerance and blood-lust.]
"I got to be friends with Palestinians and Saudi Arabians, who strongly encouraged me to read the Koran from a proselytising direction," he recalls. "My interest had to do with my own family.
I had heard stories of my grandparents in the Ottoman Empire, but I didn't read it with any negative preconceptions. In fact, I was quite positive about the whole thing."But reading the Koran for the first time was certainly an eye-opener. "I was surprised to see that there was indeed religiously sanctioned violence in it, as well as some others things which I found disturbing. But it was all intriguing, because I was entranced by the shorter, poetic chapters. I thought it very striking that this beauty could co-exist with clear mandates for warfare and violence against unbelievers."
During the 1980s and 1990s Spencer was a low-key expert on the Koran, during a period when Europe and America slept through Islamism's adolescence. He watched as attacks on American targets escalated, from the bombing of the World Trade Centre in 1993 to the attacks on the USS Cole and the embassies in Africa.
"None of that surprised me," he says. "I thought it was the playing out of something that was clearly intrinsic to Islam.[MW: Terrorist violence "intrinsic to Islam"??? Come off it! What about Jewish terrorism in Palestine in the run-up to the creation of Israel? What about he massacres of the Irgun and the Lehi (Stern Gang) of Palestinian villages, such as at Deir Yassein? What about the blowing up of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem? What about the kidnapping and slow-hanging with wire of the British Army Sergeants Paice and Martin at Netanya? The list of terrorism perpetrated by the Zionist 'Revisionists' is endless. It is now being perpetrated on an "official" basis by the Israeli army against Palestinian people on the West Bank and in the Gaza strip, which is an enormous concentration camp whose inmates now face starvation. The Jews invented the techniques of modern-day terrorism which were later studied and replicated by the likes of the "Catholic" IRA Provos and the Islamic fanatics. Thus in asserting that terrorist violence is "intrinsic to Islam", Spencer betrays either massive ignorance or massive bias. The tone of his comments entitles us to suspect the latter.]
"I never intended to do this work publicly," he points out; still, while most specialists dream that their chosen subject takes centre stage. Spencer was put in an uncomfortable position when, one Tuesday morning, the West's interest in the "religion of peace" rocketed."I was invited to write this first book -- Islam Unveiled -- after 9/11. I agreed, then I was surprised by how well it did, that there was this great thirst for this perspective. People realise they are being lied to in the mainstream."
Spencer's popularity would not be possible without that other great fixture of our age: the internet.
"The percentage of internet sales for my books are significantly higher than most," he says, "many bookstores don't sell them and people are afraid to talk about it, but there's this whole underground on the internet that I would liken to that in the Soviet Union. Whenever there's a straightjacket that stifles freedom of thought, people are going to react. The internet has shifted public opinion because it's given the opportunity for the truth to be known."
Jihad Watch, launched in 2003, has allowed him to answer his critics, and especially charges of "Islamophobia", a label he dismisses. "It's a fictional, trumped-up political term, there to deflect attention away from the violence committed by Muslims in the name of Islam.
Victim status equals privileged status in the West. People know they can be free from criticism and ordinary scrutiny."The best way to counter genuine hatred of Muslims would be for the Islamic community to end their support for the ideology of violence."[MW: Will the Jews engage in a reciprocal renuciation, especially vis-a-vis Palestine?]
His greatest critics come from that element of the Left supportive of Islam against "the West", a marriage seen by renegade liberals and socialists as the most ill-conceived alliance since a distinctly non-Aryan Japan sided with Nazi Germany.To Spencer it makes perfect sense. "There is a deep ideological affinity between the Left and the jihadists. Whenever the hard Left gained power they instituted a reign of terror in order to create what they envisage as a just society, brought about by force. Islamic law works in much the same way: utopia created by force.
"Other critics suggest that by presenting jihad as the authentic voice of Islam, Spencer undermines the religion's more moderate strains. One opponent even suggested he was a "one-man recruiting agent for al-Qaeda"."I have never said that anyone's view of Islam is correct, but what I do say is that the jihadists constantly portray themselves as the true voice of Islam, and the moderates have never mounted an adequate comeback," he argues."There is no true Islam, there is no pope of Islam, but the eight classical schools of Islam all teach warfare against unbelievers. We deceive ourselves if we think [violence] is just something that's manufactured by the Wahhabis and not present in Islam in general. They teach it but they certainly didn't invent it.
"A chief recruiting ground is secular Europe, where the decline of Christianity has created a dangerous vacuum. "No doubt about it, young men feel rootless, they feel that life doesn't have any purpose. Against the West, which they have come to despise, [jihad] is attractive.
It offers adamantine certainties." Spencer subscribes to the growing view -- expressed in books such as While Europe Slept, Eurabia and Mark Steyn's America Alone -- that the contrasting birth rates between Muslim immigrants and secular Europeans will lead to catastrophe."There will be civil war in Europe," he says. "The European citizenry, for the most part, are not ready to accept Islamic law and there will be armed conflicts. Across Europe there seems to be one opinion among the elite and one among the people; the mainstream political parties are going to have to start representing this, otherwise they're going to be shunted aside by the neo-fascists."In the running of Jihad Watch Spencer is actively helped by a Jew [emphasis added by MW] and an atheist, an example of the sort of cooperation that he feels is needed now.
"Secular Europe is already over, but I'm happy to stand with secularists against the Islamicisation of Europe and of America," he says. "Above all, we shouldn't fight among ourselves, but against global jihad.
If we're consumed with each other then we don't stand a chance."Fascism lasted 25 years, Communism for 75; Islam is 1,400 years old, the imperative to make war against unbelievers is 1,400 years old and they believe they are fighting a 1,400-year-old struggle. And jihad will destroy us if we don't do anything about it."[MW intrudes this comment: Does Spencer know nothing of the millennia-old hatred of all types of Gentiles which is at the core of Judaism, as expounded throughout the books of The Talmud? Why do Jews still celebrate the massacre in Old Testament times of Haman's army and the evisceration and dismemberment of Haman's corpse with the eating of "Haman's Ears" -- jam-covered pastries in the shape of a human ear -- at the Purim festival? Why do Orthodox Jews routinely spit whenever they see a Christian cross? Does one have to rehearse all the umpteen Talmudic statements about what it is right and proper for Jews to do to Gentiles by way of theft, deception, perjury and murder? What do Orthodox Jews think of Christians today if they teach that Christ is in a pot in Hell, boiling in his own semen, while his contemporaries are in pots around, him boiling in their own excrement? Has this man Spencer troubled to read the late Prof. Israel Shahak's book Jewish History, Jeweish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, (Pluto Press) in which the Jewish heritage of cultivated hatred and violence is fully explored?]--------------------------------------
*Robert Spencer's new book, Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn't, will be issued in August by Regnery Publishing (http://www.regnery.com/).

BNP is linked to petition
against new
'megamosque'
Right-wing extremists have manipulated a Downing Street petition to stir up racial hatred over the building of a "megamosque" in east London, an investigation can reveal.
More than 270,000 people have signed a petition on the Number 10 website that calls for the scrapping of plans to build Europe's largest mosque close to the main site of the 2012 Olympics.

Tablighi Jamaat, the Islamic sect behind the mosque, has been accused of having links to Islamist terror groups, prompting a concerted campaign to block the project.
Scroll down for more...

Controversial: an early design for the proposed new mosque in east London.
But the Daily Mail's sister paper, the Evening Standard, has learned that the anti-mosque campaign has been infiltrated by the British National Party, which has told its members to sign the Downing Street petition. The petition was originally posted on the No 10 site by a Right-wing extremist called Jill Barham.

Ms Barham writes an online blog under the name English Rose, where she has laid claim to being author of the petition. The blog has links to several Right-wing and extremist websites.
Anti-fascist campaigners claim Ms Barham is a close friend of Chris Hill, a notorious BNP activist based in Lancaster. The involvement of fringe extremists from the North-West in what is essentially an east London planning matter has caused alarm and will lead to criticism that Downing Street should have blocked the petition over its use of inflammatory language.

The petition, which closed yesterday with 277,040 signatories, states: "We, the Christian population of this great country England, would like the proposed plan to build a mega-mosque in east London scrapped. This will only cause terrible violence and suffering and more money should go into the NHS."

Mayor Ken Livingstone condemned the petition for stirring up vitriol. "It is quite clear that this piece of vicious BNP propaganda, based as usual on entirely fabricated information, is solely designed to damage good community relations. It is wrong that such invented and falsified petitions provide a platform for those who would like to use them to create tensions among Londoners."


The BNP today admitted orchestrating a campaign to get its members to sign the petition. An email had been sent out to supporters with links to the petition on the Downing Street website.
The party used a similar tactic to try to influence a poll on the Evening Standard's website that had simply asked: "Are you in favour of the £100million mosque?"

The poll was withdrawn after the discovery of the extremists' attempts to manipulate the outcome.

BNP leader Nick Griffin said: "We have publicised the petition on our website encouraging people to sign and we have had a small part to play in that [reaching 270,000 signatures]. We also had an email campaign to get our people to sign it."

Asked whether he was aware of the English Rose blog or if Ms Barham was a BNP activist, Mr Griffin said: "Even if I knew who she was I wouldn't tell you. She may be involved in the BNP at a local level but I just don't know. I can neither confirm nor deny." The website of Lancaster United Against Fascists says that it believes the BNP's local candidate, Chris Hill, is a friend of Ms Barham. The group said today its inquiries indicated Ms Barham ran two websites English Rose and Cry For Freedom, both of them which it described as "rabidly anti-Islamic".

The success of the petition has been seized on by protesters as evidence of the strength of opposition to the mosque.

Newham councillor Alan Craig, a member of the Christian People's Alliance, issued a press release yesterday highlighting the petition's success, although he refused to sign it and admitted he was "wary of the exact wording". He is leading the local campaign against the mosque, planned for an 18-acre site at Abbey Mills next to West Ham Underground station. Mr Craig accused Tablighi Jamaat of being divisive because of its extremist, separatist beliefs.

The French intelligence services have called Tablighi Jamaat "an antechamber of fundamentalism". Two of the 7 July suicide bombers allegedly attended the group's HQ in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire.

Abdul Rashid Bhatti, spokesman for the Abbey Mills Mosque, said today: "Ken Livingstone has exposed the petition for what it is, and we thank him for that. Both in the language used and in the total lack of truth, we are disappointed that people have been so misled for purposes other than genuine public debate. Tablighi Jamaat is a mainstream, non-political Muslim organisation seeking to go about its faith in a peaceful manner."

All programmes fake it, claims top TV producer !

A top television executive claims that TV's "culture of deception" extends across all programmes - even the news. (NWN:Surprise,surprise ! )

David Cox, former LWT head of current affairs and now an independent producer for the BBC, ITV and Channel 4, said it "goes on all the time. We're bad boys".

Cox confessed to manipulating the truth on news reports himself, saying: "Any kind of TV, even news and current affairs, have built into them the idea of a fabrication which is justified and necessary... but it can easily shade into what becomes in some cases a lie.
When the pressure is on, you've got to meet a deadline, there's this blurry border and it's easy to cross the line.""

He also dismissed BBC director-general-Mark Thompson's take on the crisis, involving faked phone-in competitions on Children in Need, Sport Relief, Comic Relief and the Liz Kershaw Show on BBC 6 Music.

Cox, whose credits include BBC2 debating series Nation, said: "This springs from something deep, not - as Mark Thompson would have you believe - that this came about suddenly... There's a culture of deception in TV since it was created."


Thursday, July 19, 2007



You could not make this stuff up..................surely !


Chris Jackson speaks ...........................
News has been received that a meeting held in support of Chris's BNP leadership bid was held in Salford,Manchester, last night, Wednesday 18th.July 2007.
Apparently, there was a very good attendance too !
More detail when we get it....................


Second Anniversary of the death of John Tyndall
Enemy Finger in the Pie


John Tyndall asks: Is the BNP infiltrated by hostile agents?



As can be seen from the report on page 4 of Spearhead magazine, last month I was expelled from the British National Party for the second time in 16 months. The charges were as ludicrous this time as they were the previous time. Then I took legal action to obtain reinstatement, and I was successful: to avoid the matter going to court and very big costs being incurred, party chairman Nick Griffin agreed to an out-of-court settlement whereby the expulsion was annulled and my membership restored. As it was, the action was expensive: due to a procedural error by my solicitors in notifying Mr. Griffin of the application for judicial review of the case, the judge hearing the costs application ruled that each party to the dispute pay its own costs. A total bill of over £12,000 resulted from this fiasco, which was split roughly equally. The cause of Nationalism in Britain, never abounding in affluence, was that much the poorer for Mr. Griffin's folly.

Just what the costs will amount to in the new action which I have been forced to institute over this latest expulsion remains to be seen, but the affair will not be dealt with cheaply. No one regrets more than I do the fact that loyal nationalists will again be asked to dig into their pockets to pay, but the dispute has not been of my making. I never had Mr. Griffin expelled; he has had me expelled – twice!

A study of the history of Nick Griffin's involvement in nationalist politics indicates that he gets rather a kick out of expelling people – or, if not that, proscribing them – which amounts to almost the same thing. In our October 2003 issue we took a look at a document titled Attempted Murder, of which Mr. Griffin was the main author. This chronicled the internal quarrels that convulsed the National Front in 1986, in which he (Griffin) stood right at the centre. As a sample of paranoia it takes some beating; and it should be studied by everyone who wants to arrive at some understanding of the troubles now besetting the BNP. Attempted Murder can be read online at www.aryanunity.com/attempted_murder.html

But this would only touch at the surface of these troubles. There is much more that is needed to explain what is now going on in our party than the personality of Chairman Nick. We need to step back for a moment and focus on the bigger picture. This is important because, from the many letters and e-mails that I receive from nationalists around the country, I sense that an awful lot of people are utterly confused. The political climate in Britain is now more favourable to us than it has ever been. Despite the disappointments of last June's round of elections, both European and municipal, we are still getting some hugely encouraging votes. We should be on the crest of a wave of high morale and optimism, with our ranks united and our tails up. Yet the BNP is racked with internal division and widespread demoralisation – a truth which is only superficially concealed by the upbeat 'spin' that comes from official publications and bulletins.

Suspensions and expulsions
Right now, one of the party's best organisers in the South of England is under suspension, with his branch virtually in a state of limbo – only a probable five months from a vital general election. Another excellent organiser, in the East Midlands, has just been expelled (welcome to the club!). A leading activist in the London area only reported to me just before Christmas the alarming state of dissatisfaction among members throughout the capital and its suburbs. Just what is happening?

I will endeavour to give my own up-to-date 'take' on the situation. It is one which necessarily requires a certain amount of repetition, over which I hope readers will bear with me. The repetition must begin with some words quoted in these pages in our March 1999 issue. They come from a report in The Express newspaper published on 18th February of that year, and they read:-

'Scotland Yard and MI5 are planning a huge covert operation to break up violent racist organizations. The Express has learned that intelligence officers will infiltrate far Right groups such as the British National Party.
'Other officers will tap telephones, open mail and scrutinise bank accounts and medical records. "We plan to close down these organizations by using every administrative device available to us," said a Yard source.'


I believe that we must constantly keep these words in the forefront of our minds if we are to make sense of what has been happening to our party in the near six years that have followed. And it is perhaps the right place and moment for a further quote:-
'More recently, as the National Front declined to a mere rump, the British National Party (BNP) has been seen as more dangerous. By the early 1990s MI5 had successfully recruited or turned several agents inside the BNP.'


These words come from a book Defending the Realm, by Mark Hollingsworth and Nick Fielding, published by Andre Deutsch in 1999. I have no way of ascertaining the sources of the writers' information, but I have to presume that they carried out considerable research into the workings of MI5, the establishment's main internal security service, and would have had no reason to invent their claim. They are almost certainly no friends of the BNP and would not have made it to do us any favours.


This aside, the claim gives all the appearance of fitting logically into the picture of what has been happening in the party. Taken in conjunction with the words of the Scotland Yard spokesman reported in The Express newspaper, they present a scenario that should at once sound loud warning bells and enlighten us as to what our enemies are doing. For myself, I can see no rhyme nor reason in the conflicts we have had in the BNP without such forces at work – and this applies not only to our party but to other nationalist organizations, past and present, where similar internal trouble has been constantly visible. In one case, in the National Front in the 1970s, I was able to observe the same pattern: recurring internecine quarrels and splits, which seemed to break out not when there was organisational and political failure but at the moments of greatest success, when in theory morale should have been high and unity at its strongest.


Internal subversion
These experiences of years ago led me to give a good deal of study and thought to the question of internal subversion of dissident political groups carried out by the state and other hostile agencies. The phenomenon is not new, and it is not confined to Britain; in fact it has been a recognised technique of political warfare for centuries. Neither should we imagine that it targets only our side of the political spectrum. The writers of Defending the Realm affirm that it is practised also against radical left-wing organisations, most notably of all the IRA but also cranky fringe groups like the Socialist Workers' Party.


The infiltrator is an animal of which most nationalists are aware, but many have only the sketchiest idea of his chief function. There is often talk of 'enemy plants' working to get inside information, but where this occurs it is only for the purpose of that information being used in much more destructive designs. At the end of the day, nationalist political parties like the BNP are absolutely legal: unlike terrorist groups, they have nothing to hide. Not a single one of their activities is secret. The infiltrator, whether state or other, can obtain no information about these activities that his controllers do not already know about because of their completely open nature.


The principal function of the infiltrator in a nationalist political group that operates within the law (and nearly all do) is to promote internal sabotage. This can best be done by encouraging the formation of rival factions, in conflict with one another over matters of leadership or policy. Here there is almost always ready-made fuel for the saboteur.


Radical organisations tend by their nature to be fractious. They attract individuals with strong opinions, sometimes amounting to obsessions. This fractiousness is most common on the left, where ideological arguments that would appear to us ridiculously nit-picking in their proportions can become the subject of passionate and raging quarrels. On our side of politics conflicts of this kind are less common, though far from unknown. In the early to mid-1980s a group gained ascendancy in the National Front which pushed hard and persistently for the adoption of what came to be known as 'Strasserite' policies. This appellation was taken from a rebel faction in Hitler's National Socialist Party in Germany led by the brothers Otto and Gregor Strasser, which sought to combine a kind of civic Nationalism with social and economic doctrines that were little short of Bolshevism.


At the time all this was happening, I and people of like mind to me had parted company with the official Front over matters in no way connected with it, but we were still hoping for the fractured marriage to be repaired and the party united again. I noted that those most vociferous in their advocacy of the 'Strasser' line of thought were the most obdurately resistant to such a reunification, resorting to ideological pettifogging as an excuse for their self-entrenchment rather than focusing on the bigger picture. At the time I thought of them, politically speaking, as immature schoolboys who had a lot of growing up to do: their political ideas were shallow, sloppily thought out and very easy to demolish in debate. What I did not consider seriously enough then – though I did later – was that there could be some method in their evident silliness, and that 'Strasserite' politics could well have been some skilfully conceived wedge driven into the remnants of the former NF in order to ensure its continued division.


Unnecessary divide
However, a more obvious and easily available pretext for division within nationalism has always been the disagreement between what, for simplification, we might call the 'hard-liners' and the 'modernisers' within the movement. I have always regarded this conflict as grossly exaggerated in substance and wholly unnecessary when measured beside the strategic imperatives confronting us.


In all politics there is the ever-present debate as to ways and means: whether to present objectives in strident, uncompromising tones or to employ the 'soft sell', the soothing, moderately worded approach that will encounter the fewest objectors. To a great extent, divisions over these matters are rooted in the differing personal characters of those who argue them. There are those of the born warrior outlook, who will tend naturally towards the fighting approach which brooks no compromise; and there are the natural conciliators, who will forever be seeking gentler methods because their temperaments can conceive no other way.


I have long believed that the course of practical politics demands a fusion of the two instincts: that of the fighter and that of the diplomat, wisdom lying in recognising the moments and situations in which one or the other is called for, and deciding accordingly. A movement with an excess of warrior qualities over the qualities of the conciliator will rush blindly into political action that is often ill-conceived and self-destructive, while one in which these attributes exist in reverse measure will atrophy and wither on the vine because of a shortage of courage, motivation and will.


When all is said and done, I believe that it has to be the code and approach of the fighter that must prevail over that of the conciliator; but the fighter must be one with the discernment to accept the need for conciliatory methods when the situation calls for them. Here we who like to think of ourselves as fighters must be aware of instincts within us which sometimes need curbing, and to curb them when required. Here we have the fusion that makes for the soldier-politician, of whom Caesar, Napoleon and Marlborough were outstanding examples.


On the other hand, human nature being what it is, it is only rarely that life's born conciliators can overcome their innermost instincts and face a real fight when fighting is the only option.
And as with individuals, it is the same with ideologies, which tend to conform to individual bent. An ideology of firmness and strength should be able to incorporate the gentler virtues and practise them when needs demand. But an ideology rooted in weakness can never summon firmness and strength that simply are not there.


Recipe for splits
This is a bit of a diversion but, I hope, a useful one in identifying potential sources of conflict in a political movement. Between people of goodwill there is reasoned thought and discussion over the respective tactical viewpoints; but to the would-be wrecker these viewpoints, instead of being reconciled in synthesis, present a perfect recipe for internal quarrels resulting in factions and splits.


Again and again, I have seen this happen in nationalist organisations; and again and again I have come to the conclusion that somewhere, in each case, there is an external agency stoking the fires of conflict where common sense, and a focus on the greater common good, could have avoided it. I believe that just such an external agency – indeed more than just one – has been present in the divisions which over recent years have convulsed the British National Party.
It is at this point that we should focus on a third type that is to be found in organisations. This type has instincts neither towards the 'hard-line' nor gentler approach but is in the struggle for essentially egotistical reasons – and sometimes also mercenary ones. To this type, arguments about 'hard-line' or 'soft-line' politics have only one utility and criterion: do they advance or retard his own personal ambitions and personal faction? He can be at one moment the hard-line fundamentalist and the very next moment the soft-line 'moderniser' according to tactical requirements – the tactical requirements being not those of the party but purely his own.
This type, again, is putty in the hands of the would-be wrecker. His ego and ambition can be so easily exploited by cunning manipulation which sets him against others with whom he should be working in dedication to a common cause.


Mysterious new arrivals
Many of us noticed that shortly before or shortly after the leadership change that took place in the BNP in 1999 a number of new figures emerged in the party, little or nothing of whom had been known previously; and many of these graduated quickly to senior positions. Where were they coming from? What was their motivation? Were they with us to help or hinder?
Absolutely certain answers to these questions cannot be supplied, but it was noticeable that virtually all of these people aligned themselves decisively with the so-called 'modernising' faction in the party which had gained the ascendancy through the leadership change.
In what limited contact I had with these people one thing struck me vividly. Their arrogance and conviction in the rightness of their attitudes was astounding. Most of them were young enough to be my children and some even my grandchildren. Their practical experience of the nationalist struggle was at an apprentice level. Yet they spoke to me about political ideology and tactics as if they were experienced achievers with battle honours under their belts and I a young lad just out of school. Just where had they learned all this stuff? At an MI5 training college perhaps? Or were they just wired up that way? One of these explanations is not necessarily exclusive of the other.


In previous articles I have focused on the various policy and presentational gimmicks that have been employed allegedly with the object of making the BNP more 'electable': a Sikh newspaper columnist; a Jewish candidate (and later councillor); a Asian spokesman on a TV party political broadcast; declarations that the party would be satisfied with the permanent presence of ethnic minorities in Britain, providing there were not too many of them. I could go on.


I have never believed that these innovations make more than 0.01 per cent difference either to our election results or to our recruitment. On the other hand, they have been hugely divisive to the party internally, with large numbers of members, including some of our best activists, quitting it in disgust. Is this just folly – the lack of intelligent political calculation of gain and loss? Or is it deliberate – a quite cynical manoeuvre aimed at alienating the genuine nationalists within and without and turning the BNP into nothing better than a neutered Tory pressure group? I am in no doubt myself as to the answer to these questions. I hope that what is written here will lead others to think about them seriously. Let us remember the words of the 'Yard source' back in 1999. "We plan to close down these organisations..." One way to close down an organisation is to divide it into fragments which, separately, exert almost zero influence in national politics. This was what happened to the National Front at the end of the 1970s. Is it the strategy now being pursued with regard to the BNP? There is a great deal of evidence – albeit admittedly circumstantial – that it is.


I have spoken earlier of the sacking and suspension of excellent organisers and branches. If this is not intended as a deliberate act of sabotage of the party, it most certainly is operating to that effect. The pretext for this orgy of purges is the need to maintain internal party discipline. Well, there is no one more firmly committed to the principle of internal party discipline than I. But in an organisation of volunteers – very different from a branch of the armed forces – discipline cannot be imposed by bullying and coercion; it must be maintained with prudence and must begin with its ultimate arbiter – the top party leadership – winning respect and being seen to apply it disinterestedly and with a view solely to the party's welfare. This simply has not been happening in the BNP. Certain people have been 'chopped' on purported disciplinary grounds, while others much more deserving of disciplinary action have been allowed to get away with almost anything they like – providing they show loyalty and willing subservience to the people currently in control. This is not a recipe for order in the party; it is one for self-destruction.


Financial gravy train
It is the time now to take another look at the BNP's quite ludicrously inflated wage bill. I have asked the questions before: Who is being paid and how much? And whence is coming the money to keep this gravy train on the rails? The people bidding to take over the party in 1999 made one of their main campaigning issues a demand for transparency and accountability in the handling of party finances. Yet these present questions continue to be shrouded in secrecy. Why?


I would suggest that the overriding reason for the payments that are being doled out to so many party functionaries is that they are intended to keep them subservient and acquiescent in the numerous outrageous policy decisions that have been made over the past few years and a few examples of which I have highlighted. In any other circumstances there would have been a palace revolt at the top of the party, with numerous senior officers simply not being willing to accept what has been going on. Yet there has been an almost indecent compliance. Could it be that when promptings of rebellion come from the inner conscience a self-reminder about bread-and-butter dependency stiffle the urge. Thoughts about the mortgage or instalments on the motor car act as a brake on protest.


I would strongly urge those in receipt of these emoluments to examine their consciences again. Can they reconcile their positions with personal honour and self-respect? Can they with sincerity condemn the 'bought' politicians of the established parties when they have their feet planted on the same path?


And I ask again: where is the money coming from? I remind those in control of their previous clamour for transparency. Where is the transparency here?


No to new party!
As I write these words, many still urge me to take the lead in forming a new party. As has happened in the past, I refuse to take that step. All previous experience counsels against it. Indeed I am convinced that it has been the intention and hope that I would launch and lead a breakaway movement from the BNP that explains so much of what has been happening – both to the party itself and to me personally. But I simply do not intend to play these people's game. The name of the game is divide-and-conquer. It made Nationalism in Britain impotent for so many years. It is the hope and prayer of those who seek to keep things this way.


And just as I would be playing our enemies' game by consenting to the setting up of a breakaway party, so also are those who on grounds of principle and protest have let their party subscriptions lapse, and have thus disenfranchised themselves with regard to action for internal change. If you aren't a member you can't vote. And if you can't vote you're going to leave things as they are. Here I risk offending some of my staunchest friends and allies by saying that this kind of abstention boils down to a form of self-indulgence. It is precisely what is wanted by the people who are steering the BNP – whether by intention or under manipulative forces of which they have no knowledge – to self-destruction. You may not like sending these people money at renewal time. Nor do I. But it is an utterly necessary procedure if the BNP is to be saved.
With these thoughts I wish a happy new year to all those genuinely devoted to the cause of race and nation.



http://www.spearhead.com/0501-jt3.html

Wednesday, July 18, 2007


BNP Leadership election farce .......................
NWN: What sort of election/game is it, where one of the contestants tells the other contestant the rules they are to play by ? That is exactly what Nick Griffin is saying in the below e-mail to Mike Easter.

=========================

Email from Nick Griffin to Mike Easter 30th June 2007
Michael Easter Esq

Campaign Manager


Chris Jackson leadership election campaign



Dear Mr Easter


Following receipt of Mr Jackson's nomination papers for the 2007 BNP leadership election, and the close of nominations, I write to set out the way in which the contest will be run.

In setting this I am mindful of two key aims:
To ensure that the process is both fair and seen to be fair; and to minimise the opportunities for troublemakers to damage the party.

British premier stresses his pro-Israel credentials
Gordon Brown tells British Zionists he always loved Israel
By Redress Information & Analysis
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has appointed Israel apologists to key positions and has been at pains to reassure British Zionists of his support and affection for IsraelIf anyone had harboured illusions that Britain¹s new prime minister, Gordon Brown, might adopt a less biased position towards Israel than his Zionist predecessor, Tony Blair, now is the time to dispel them.To begin with, Gordon Brown has appointed
<http://www.redress.cc/global/redress20070628> Israel apologists to key positions in his government, with arch-Zionist James Purnell heading the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, which has oversight responsibilities for the British media, including the BBC, and Douglas Alexander, a recipient of Labour Friends of Israel hospitality, taking over the Department for International Development.
They are complemented by another Israel apologist, Jim Murphy, who has become minister of state for Europe with responsibility for the BBC World Service and the British Council. Mr Murphy served as chairman of Labour Friends of Israel during 2000-02 and has also been a member of the Anglo-Israeli All Party Parliamentary Group.In addition, Gordon Brown has appointed Simon McDonald, a former British ambassador to Israel and a man described <http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1182951030857&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter> by Israeli officials as "a true friend to Israel", as his chief foreign policy adviser.
Gordon Brown has also been at pain to stress his Christian Zionist credentials.
In a speech to the Labour Friends of Israel annual fundraising dinner in April 2007, quoted <http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1182951030857&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter> by the Israeli newspaper The Jerusalem Post, Brown described how his father, a Presbyterian preacher, had been a passionate supporter of Israel who had taken him to the racist Jews-only state at least twice a year for most of his adult life to show solidarity with the usurpers of Palestinian land.He said:"Many of you know my interest in Israel and in the Jewish community has been long-standing... My father was the chairman of the Church of Scotland's Israel Committee.
Not only as I've described to some of you before did he make visits on almost two occasions a year for 20 years to Israel ­ but because of that, although Fife [Scotland], where I grew up, was a long way from Israel with no TV pictures to link us together ­ I had a very clear view from household slides and projectors about the history of Israel, about the trials and tribulations of the Jewish people, about the enormous suffering and loss during the Holocaust, as well as the extraordinary struggle that he described to me of people to create this magnificent homeland."
Indeed, Gordon Brown made a strong impression on his Zionist hosts.
Jane Kennedy, chairwoman of Labour Friends of Israel, said <http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1182951030857&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter> : I have always felt that Gordon Brown is instinctively a good friend of Israel and I look forward to working with him.
The combination of Gordon as prime minister and Tony Blair as Quartet Middle East envoy is a really exciting prospect and gives real hope for progress in the Middle East peace process. We ourselves have never harboured any illusions about Gordon Brown. For those of our readers who have, we suggest you take comfort in the fact that, as far as international relations and the Middle East are concerned, neither the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland nor the Quartet are of any consequence whatsoever.
While the has-been great power of bygone years is nothing but an appendage of the United States, the talking shop that has just appointed a war criminal as its peace envoy is no more than an international cover for US support for Israel. As far as we are concerned, Britain, the Quartet, Gordon Brown and Tony Blair are irrelevant.

We seem to be experiencing some problems with BLOGGER. Hopefully this will soon be sorted out.