Saturday, March 31, 2007
where are you ?
The movement needs this guy ASAP !
Please get in touch.............
Friday, March 30, 2007
If people were taught what they needed to be taught in the first 12 grades of public school, most of them wouldn't need college . In fact, today's colleges exist largely to liberalize young people by filling their heads with left-wing, egalitarian propaganda. This, of course, transforms our culture into crap. As the great Dr. William Pierce noted , our society only needs a small percentage of college-educated people, and even then, they should study only certain, "real" subjects [one can get a decree in nearly anything today]. The rest of the citizens can learn trades, work in public service, etc. Isn't it time to stop spending big money on a largely-worthless college education for Sally or Linda which will only turn them into unhappy, liberal feminists?
 we wasted vast amounts of time in public school learning about, for example, the Black "civil-rights" movement and Martin Luther King, Jr.
 see the pamphlet "The Roots of Civilization" by Dr. William L. Pierce, which is vital and timeless reading. Only an abridged version of the pamphlet is currently available on the internet. Quoting Pierce in the paper pamphlet: "Twelve years of elementary and secondary schooling, properly organized, is sufficient for all but a small percentage of a nation's youth." Pierce says that our whole system of elementary and secondary education needs to be reorganized in order to move away from our current educational system framework, which amounts to "style in the place of substance." This important pamphlet, which every White person should read, can be ordered from National Vanguard Books, Hillsboro, WV., or visit this webpage: http://www.natvanbooks.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid=465&p_catid=18
10a. The leading cause of death is birth.
9. Good health is merely the slowest rate at which one can die.
8. Men have two emotions: hungry and horney. If you see him without an erection, make him a sandwich.
7. Give a person a fish and you feed them for a day. Teach a person to use the internet and they won't bother you for weeks.
6. Some people are like a slinky--not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs.
5. Health nuts are going to feel stupid some day, lying in the hospital dying of nothing.
4. All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.
3. Why does a slight tax increase cost you two hundred dollars, and a substantial tax cut save you thirty cents?
2. In the 60s people took LSD to make the world weird. Now the world is weird and people take Prozac to make it normal.
Thursday, March 29, 2007
Prime Minister Tony Blair was visiting a primary school and he visited one of the classes. They were in the middle of a discussion related to words and their meanings.
The teacher asked the Prime Minister if he would like to lead the discussion on the word "tragedy". So the illustrious leader asked the class for an example of a "tragedy".
One little boy stood up and offered: "If my best friend, who lives on a farm, is playing in the field & a tractor runs over him and kills him. that would be a 'tragedy'""No," said Blair, "that would be an accident."
A little girl raised her hand: "If a school bus carrying fifty children drove over a cliff, killing everyone inside, that would be a tragedy.""I'm afraid not," explained the Prime Minister "That's what we would call a great loss."
The room went silent.
No other children volunteered.
Tony searched the room.
"Isn't there someone here who can give me an example of tragedy?"
Finally, at the back of the room, a small boy raised his hand...In a quiet voice he said: "If the aeroplane carrying you and Mrs. Blair was struck by a "friendly fire" missile & blown to smithereens that would be a tragedy.
"Fantastic!" exclaimed Tony Blair. "That's right. And can you tell me why that would be a tragedy?"
"Well," says the boy "It has to be a tragedy, because it certainly wouldn't be a great loss and it probably wouldn't be an accident either".
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Florrie Rost van Tonningen has died. More to come......
11/14/14 — 3/24/07
The entire meeting was rather disastrous, actually. Eddy Morrison had been drunk all week and wasn't in attendance.
Sid Williamson was pissed out of his head (I believe now what they say about him on VNN)
He kept shouting he is 2 i/c the BPP after Kev Watmough.
He declared he wasn't going to chair the meeting so when Tony Braithwaite and Pete Rushton took the platform, Sid lurched up and made a speech of sorts, much to the embarrassment of most there.......
TB spoke for a while on the necessity of nationalist unity, as did Pete,interrupted occasionally by Sid calling-out, standing up, and waving his arms. When Tony went to introduce Gunther, Sid bellowed that we should have a break.
However he was ignored and Gunther 'took the floor'.
He spoke for some time on the state of nationalism in Germany, again with the odd interjection by Sid. I felt for the man. He had come all that way to address an audience of 17, including a child! God knows what he must have thought........
I saw the write-up on their website and it was certainly greatly exaggerated! I was going to post on SF about it, but then thought it would be a bit unfair of the decent chaps who are drawn to the BPP, so I just left it.
NWN: This is the only report that we have seen/heard, about this activity. Strange that !
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
General Ivashov Calls For Emergency Session Of UN Security Council To Ward Off Looming US Aggression By Webster G. Tarpley3-25-7
WASHINGTON DC -- The long awaited US military attack on Iran is now on track for the first week of April, specifically for 4 AM on April 6, the Good Friday opening of Easter weekend, writes the well-known Russian journalist Andrei Uglanov in the Moscow weekly "Argumenty Nedeli." Uglanov cites Russian military experts close to the Russian General Staff for his account.
The attack is slated to last for twelve hours, according to Uglanov, lasting from 4 AM until 4 PM local time. Friday is a holiday in Iran. In the course of the attack, code named Operation Bite, about 20 targets are marked for bombing; the list includes uranium enrichment facilities, research centers, and laboratories.
The first reactor at the Bushehr nuclear plant, where Russian engineers are working, is supposed to be spared from destruction. The US attack plan reportedly calls for the Iranian air defense system to be degraded, for numerous Iranian warships to be sunk in the Persian Gulf, and the for the most important headquarters of the Iranian armed forces to be wiped out.
The attacks will be mounted from a number of bases, including the island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. Diego Garcia is currently home to B-52 bombers equipped with standoff missiles.
Also participating in the air strikes will be US naval aviation from aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, as well as from those of the Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean.
Additional cruise missiles will be fired from submarines in the Indian Ocean and off the coast of the Arabian peninsula.
The goal is allegedly to set back Iran's nuclear program by several years, writes Uglanov, whose article was re-issued by RIA-Novosti in various languages, but apparently not English, several days ago. The story is the top item on numerous Italian and German blogs, but so far appears to have been ignored by US websites.
Observers comment that this dispatch represents a high-level orchestrated leak from the Kremlin, in effect a war warning, which draws on the formidable resources of the Russian intelligence services, and which deserves to be taken with the utmost seriousness by pro-peace forces around the world.
Asked by RIA-Novosti to comment on the Uglanov report, retired Colonel General Leonid Ivashov confirmed its essential features in a March 21 interview: "I have no doubt that there will be an operation, or more precisely a violent action against Iran." Ivashov, who has reportedly served at various times as an informal advisor to Putin, is currently the Vice President of the Moscow Academy for Geopolitical Sciences.
Ivashov attributed decisive importance to the decision of the Democratic leadership of the US House of Representatives to remove language from the just-passed Iraq supplemental military appropriations bill which would have demanded that Bush come to Congress before launching an attack on Iran. Ivashov pointed out that the language was eliminated under pressure from AIPAC, the lobbing group representing the Israeli extreme right, and of Israeli Foreign Minister Tsipi Livni.
"We have drawn the unmistakable conclusion that this operation will take place," said Ivashov. In his opinion, the US planning does not include a land operation: " Most probably there will be no ground attack, but rather massive air attacks with the goal of annihilating Iran's capacity for military resistance, the centers of administration, the key economic assets, and quite possibly the Iranian political leadership, or at least part of it," he continued.
Ivashov noted that it was not to be excluded that the Pentagon would use smaller tactical nuclear weapons against targets of the Iranian nuclear industry. These attacks could paralyze everyday life, create panic in the population, and generally produce an atmosphere of chaos and uncertainty all over Iran, Ivashov told RIA-Novosti. "This will unleash a struggle for power inside Iran, and then there will be a peace delegation sent in to install a pro-American government in Teheran," Ivashov continued. One of the US goals was, in his estimation, to burnish the image of the current Republican administration, who would now be able to boast that they had wiped out the Iranian nuclear program.
Among the other outcomes, General Ivashov pointed to a partition of Iran along the same lines as Iraq, and a subsequent carving up of the Near and Middle East into smaller regions. "This concept worked well for them in the Balkans and will now be applied to the greater Middle East," he commented.
"Moscow must expert Russia's influence by demanding an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council to deal with the current preparations for an illegal use of force against Iran and the destruction of the basis of the United Nations Charter," said General Ivashov. "In this context Russia could cooperate with China, France and the non-permanent members of the Security Council. We need this kind of preventive action to ward off the use of force," he concluded.
I need the support of every Stormfront reader to keep the English edition of Jewish Supremacism and My Awakening in print!
My Awakening & Jewish Supremacism:The English Editions Have Gone Out of Print!
Here are some of the covers of Jewish Supremacism from around the world. From the left is the U.S., Sweden, Ukraine, Iran, and Russia
Davidduke.com has become one of the most important Internet Websites in the world standing forthrightly against the Jewish supremacist threat against the heritage and freedom of our people.
__________________Rep. David Duke, P.O. Box 188, Mandeville, LouisianaCall to order books: (985) 626-7714 DavidDuke.com European American Unity & Rights Organization (EURO)
Last Saturday afternoon two asian/pakistani drug gangs fought a pitched battle very near to the centre of Bury using guns and machetes.
Meanwhile in nearby Rochdale, a major story in the ROCHDALE OBSERVER last week was the absolute shock and horror , that a C18 sticker found it's way onto a lamp-post in the Cronkeyshaw area of the town. Police and Councillors warned the Public to stay calm !
I wonder how calm they are in Bury ?
Monday, March 26, 2007
It is reported to have been listed in the Atlanta Journal.
SINGLE BLACK FEMALE seeks male companionship, ethnicity unimportant.
The seven dwarfs go to the Vatican and, because they have requested an audience & they are THE seven dwarfs, they are ushered in to see the Pope.
Dopey leads the pack.
Dopey, my son," says the Pope, "what can I do for you?"
Dopey asks, "Excuse me your Excellency, but are there any dwarf nuns in Rome?"
The Pope wrinkles his brow at the odd question, thinks for a moment & answers, "no, Dopey there are no dwarf nuns in Rome".
In the background a few of the dwarfs start giggling. Dopey turns round & gives them a glare, silencing them.
Dopey turns back, "Your Worship, are there any dwarf nuns in all of Europe?"
The Pope, puzzled now, again thinks for a moment & then answers Dopey, thereare no dwarf nuns in Europe".
This time all of the other dwarfs burst into laughter. Dopey turns around and silences them with an angry glare.
Dopey turns back to The Pope & says "Your extreme Holiness! Are there ANY dwarf nuns any where in the world?"
After consulting with his advisors, the Pope responds,
"I'm sorry my son, there are NO dwarf nuns anywhere in the world."
The other dwarfs collapse in a heap, rolling around, laughing and pounding on the floor, tears streaming down their cheeks as they began chanting:
"Dopey sh*gged a penguin!"
"Dopey sh*gged a penguin!"
Saturday, March 24, 2007
We do not want the great 'unwashed'.
We want to allow a voice for nationalist organisers and the 'movers and shakers' in the nationalist movement in the UK, and Worldwide.
Statement from the EFP Leadership
NWN : We are going to allow this post to have its own thread. It was posted earlier on a thread on this board. We have no problems with Steve Smith.
It is important that the England First Party clear up a few misleading statements that have been made about the party and its officials lately especially so in various editions of the Lancashire Telegraph. It has been reported and claimed that Steven Smith the new chairman of the England First Party is a senior member of the British Peoples Party. Whilst he is a member which, his joining was a show of solidarity it is not true for him to be described as a senior member he does not have any influence or input into the political direction or internal workings of the party and is 100% committed to the England First Party only. Also any functions organised by the British Peoples Party that are attended by senior members of the English First Party are attended in a personal capacity and their attendance should not be seen as having the official endorsement of the England First Party. Also it has been claimed in a misleading article entitled ‘England First pair quit party’ in the 5th March edition of the Lancashire Telegraph that Mark Cotterill had left the party. This is completely untrue and Mark Cotterill is continuing as the Party’s Nominating Officer and remains a fully paid up member of the party. A request for a correction was submitted to the Lancashire Telegraph which the journalist on the story had promised but it failed to materialise. A letter is due to be sent to the editor of the Lancashire Telegraph again requesting a correction and reminding him of the Code of Practice that is laid down by the Press Complaints Commission in relation to the accuracy of reporting. Hopefully the above statement will clarify and dispel any further misleading and inaccurate reporting with regard to the party and its officials in the future.Issued by the England First Party leadership - 19th March 2007©2003-2007 England First Party, All rights reserved. This is a website for ,The England First Party, PO Box 331, Blackburn. BB1 2WU. Lancashire. a registered political party in Great Britain. Email enquiries may be sent to email@example.com and written correspondence should be sent to the above address.
After all the 'hoo- haaa' it appears that both Oldham and Rochdale BNP branches are to stand record numbers of candidates in May's elections.
Oldham's record is about six candidates.
Rochdale BNP, so ably led by outsider Kev Bryan , it's self confessed "best ever Rochdale Organiser" , will beat the 10 nationalist candidates that stood in the past, in Rochdale, quite easily.
We say that all slave traders should be revealed so that the innocent are not blamed. It was the rich people, including many jews such as Aaron Lopez and blacks, who gained from this sordid trade.
We in the UK banned slavery 200 years ago, but slavery is still existant in central African Countries.
In other words, they are, and were, enslaving their own kind.
Maybe, this is why 'the left' are attacking Mel Gibsons film Apocalypto ?
Friday, March 23, 2007
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Not All Change Is Good
(NWN: We have stolen this essay from the below blogsite link. Well worth a read.)
There is a change happening within nationalism, this change has insidiously crept in, at first unknowingly, however it is fair to say that the instigators of this change have all but won.
Forces diametrically opposed to nationalism have infiltrated our very ranks, under cover of what I dub “plastic patriotism”; this spurious patriotism has the very real potential of undermining real nationalist principles.
Unfortunately, for nationalism within this country, there have always been splits; these divisions have done nothing more than help the nation destroyers gain full Control of our countries fortunes whilst we as nationalists bicker.
In the past, the disagreements were in the main centred around the degree of credence given to national socialist ideology as it applied to Great Britain.Many of our nationalist leaders in times past, asserted that National Socialism had absolutely no bearing upon our countries fight and that National Socialism belonged where it was in the past.
This opinion didn’t in fact help nationalism within our once great country, as the owned media still likened nationalism with Mr Hitler’s Germany.
As nationalists, we all realised that there was (and still is) a largely Jewish element affecting both our countries fortunes and also that of nationalism. We couldn’t as nationalists shy away from the very real truth of historical Jewish involvement with the revolutionary left and their contemporary financing and support of pro-migrant causes, detrimental to our nation state.
However we were unwilling to adopt national socialist imagery, dress or methodology recognising that this was the domain of hobbyists who stood not a chance of gaining public support, in fact the very opposite would occur, adopting national socialist appearance would alienate the very people we were trying to attract.
There is a very real threat from Jews, not individually of course, there is no reason for extreme hatred of this race individually, however elements within the Jewish community actively support in whatever way the non-European takeover of our countries.
Historically this is perfectly understandable for whatever reason it cannot be denied that the Jewish Diaspora has suffered.
The Jewish community advocates for multiculturalism for this very reason believing that they as a people are far safer in a multi-ethnic environment than a mono-ethnic one. The Jewish nation is perhaps the most ethnocentric of all exhibiting advanced evolutionary stratagems throughout recorded history. However there has been a shift within Jewish thought, which has had a quite remarkable knock-on effect. Jews will fight for a multi-ethnic society for the reason I have given above so a person considering themselves first and foremost a Jew will advocate for this form of society regardless of their alleged party political allegiances whether left or right.
Paradoxically the Jewish community whilst wishing to remain in a multiethnic environ finds itself in a catch twenty two position, in that by supporting mass non-European migration for their own group interests, they have helped introduce their greatest contemporary foe.
There are reports that anti-semitic attacks are on the rise throughout Europe, and I believe this to be an obvious result of placing two implacable enemies within the same territorial area.
The Jewish community finds itself in an intolerable position, do they continue to support mass migration, thereby running the risk of communal attack, or do they now support anti-immigration parties.
Many Jews have moved further and further to the right however, this is purely a group strategy and has no bearing on individual thought. For ethnocentric reasons the Jew must now endeavour to combat the Islamic threat, it is for this reason that the Muslim community finds itself besieged in the press and general mass media.
Many within the nationalist community fall for this completely we see so-called nationalist parties combating the Islamic menace but very little else.
The Jewish Diaspora support Israel unequivocally, even should one of their fellows criticise the state of Israel then the whole community will attack with a vengeance.
Again the irony is that the socialist left have now split from their support of Israel, the very movement started by the Jewish community as a communal defence has now turned against them.
The left openly decry the actions of Israel, and extreme left-wing elements of the left have even set up a political party peopled by ardent anti-semites.
The Jewish community is tiny, their power however is tremendous currently they are manipulating public opinion in an anti-Islamic direction whilst still advocating a racially ambiguous society. Their traditional support on the left has all but deserted them albeit for some within leftist academia and even this is questioning, so they have turned to their greatest friend the followers of mammon, conservatives.
For the Jew’s conservatives have to win the next election it is imperative, however they must win this election on an anti-racist ticket, they must throw away there old persona re-establishing themselves as a centre left party.
The conservatives have always preferred to follow the pound rather than the flag however, they have in times past presented themselves as defenders of our country, even their name implies that they believe in this.
This insidious party have done more damage to our country than can be imagined, they have swindled generations of our countrymen into believing in their sham patriotism.
Whilst waving the flag at every available opportunity, these capitalistic vermin have prevented an indigenous fight back acting as a safety valve to native dissent.
For some within conservative circles their parties manoeuvring to the left has caused many to re-evaluate the traditionally dubbed far-right parties. Many of these conservative’s see the use of our country’s flag, hear the word British and they are off, indulging in their predilection for pomp and ceremony.
These conservatives find that they are urged by society to attack the invasion of our country by Islam, however they baulk at addressing other non-European invasion. They consider it their duty to defend against Islam whilst becoming misty eyed over our country’s past, a past that they had everything to do with destroying.
Conservatives follow capitalism, they have come to believe that capitalism is a western invention, and that by supporting capitalism they are supporting western civilisation, how fooled they are, how little they have looked into our glorious past.
Capitalism is a purely foreign creed to western man, we are not a collectivist people, we evolved as an individualistic race that is true, although governed by a highly developed sense of altruism which is the complete opposite of capitalism.
Conservatives can never be true nationalists their over riding instinct is to stick their nose into the trough indulging in their avariciousness. It is these people that are her majesty’s opposition, what a frightening thought in this supposed democracy, that we the people have only the choice between two extreme evils.
In shedding off their image the conservative is beginning to show their true colours, they will pale visibly if one should call a spade a spade.
They will disparage a man for speaking as they find, it seems that we must all learn “Newspeak” our very words are to be censored by the egalitarian elite.
Of course they are right, if one can change the speech of a nation, then one can change the nation, disallow words and one can veto whole systems of thought controlling the masses through communal self policing.
Eric Blair’s big brother society is truly coming to pass however to quote the author himself “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear” or one could go with “Sometimes the first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious”. In this day and age, we are not permitted to tell the truth, to recognise that the races of man are different, or that each race of man naturally works in its own group interest.
We are to watch how we act, what we say and with whom we associate, what a wonderful free society we are letting them fashion for us.
It seems that we must capitulate to foreign invaders, these savage creatures running amok in our towns and cities, least they feel offence.
We must skirt around the issue of Jewish ethnocentrism least we be accused of anti-Semitism, we must allow Marxist principles of thought control to become the norm within our land, re-titled political correctness.
But what of us have we no right to our own language or in fact our own homeland, do we exist purely to give succour to all of the peoples of this world. I say we are not, we have a right to our own countries, to live as we have always lived, we as a people have the right to throw off the shackles of political correctness.
Why should we let a warped minority shape majority thought, are words really more detrimental to mankind than the implementation of the authoritarian state they have in store for our descendants.
Is the word nigger and such like really as bad as the bloodshed taking place in Iraq on democracies behalf, is any word alluding to ones race even in a disparaging manner to be condemned.
Not all words are positive and yet without derogatory words we lose elements of description, is it just us the white race that have deprecating words then.
I live in a multi-ethnic environment, and so I have learned words of insult used by all races one towards the other.
Each man has a right to respect, however each man also has the right to the use of their common language, each in-group will have disparaging names for the out-group. If we seek to control the use of language then we may as well give up, let their coming new world order impose its evil today.
Until our majority status within Europe has ended the egalitarian elite will seek to control our every thought and action, and yet when the day comes that we as a race have amalgamated into a coffee coloured mass, then they to will find themselves controlled.
I cannot lie I what both my country and Europe for Europeans, however this is not hate, I would not laugh at the plight of a Negro lying injured at the scene of a road accident, walking by without offering aid. I wouldn’t let a Muslim child die without trying to help, or let a Jew drown, recognising that we all have a right to our individual homelands is not the same as hate.
Realising that all groups compete for limited resources and wishing for my people to succeed in the race is only natural no matter what they tell you.
Some will read the articles I and others write and think us haters as you have been taught to, you will think us anti-Semites because we contest Jewish control or racists because we advocate a return to an all-white Europe.
What a racial nationalist feels is first and foremost an affinity with their own people, we are the true conservatives wishing only to conserve our race and our territory.
The Jewish race as I have mentioned in this article exhibits extreme ethnocentric attitudes, as does the black race albeit to a slightly lesser degree. Each race and in some cases creeds displays a protectionist attitude and yet it is only whites that are pilloried, that is a truly racist act as a race with no group defence has absolutely no chance of survival.
The white race those awake to our plight looked to nationalism and for a while it looked as if maybe we had hopes of forming a bulwark against an anti-white world.
However, we find that nationalist parties in their headlong pursuit of the vote have completely abandoned their people in their hour of need.
Today the BNP never fights against Jewish control, never contests black immigration, it stands purely against Islamic colonisation. (NWN emphasis)
It is still able to hint at its origins by condemning Marxism, especially as the left has formed their unholy alliance with Islam. All this is in keeping with current orthodoxy but in no way should this be confused with nationalism, it would seem that our nationalist parties are just dressing themselves in the clothes recently discarded by the conservative party.
Incrementally we the white population of this country (and others) are left with no defence our political parties have become infested with little more than Tories playing at nationalism.
This has created a change within nationalism that is forcing many to abandon party politics leaving nationalism true nationalism with no political voice.
In the long run I can see no other choice but for the formation of a new nationalist party, a party that adheres to the true principles of nationalism. This new party if it has to be formed should in no way seek to ape National Socialism, it should contest Marxism because it is evil not because it has sided with Islam. This new party should revert back to nationalisms racialist origins in that all men have the right to live unmixed in their traditional countries of origin, in freedom. The control of finance and the press should never again rest in the hands of a few individuals and all men should be free to think and say what they truly feel.
Of course there can never be true freedom, individuals such as paedophiles, would of course have no voice and should they transgress against the innocence of the child they would quite soon have no life.
Homosexuality would once again become a private matter for the individual concerned not flaunted in the public eye as a superior lifestyle choice. A true nationalist party would fight on its traditional ground it would not cede ground to the forces of our nation destroyers.
We should remain true to nationalist principles not become just another party, changing policy to capture the public vote.
In adopting the clothes of the old Tory party nationalism has left our people undefended and yet we have never needed true nationalism as much. Our people are crying out for change I would hope nationalisms leaders would lend them their ear. 14
A friend tells me that a pic of Red 'hardman'(sic) Tilzey is in the latest Oldham Chronicle. Can someone in Oldham please send us all the details ?
We have loads of dirt on him and SEARCHLIGHT !
Thursday, March 22, 2007
The Conservatism of Fools: A Response to John Derbyshire1
By Kevin MacDonald2
Derbyshire lives in a sort of childlike world in which Jewish interests are legitimate and where Jewish attempts to pursue their interests, though they may occasionally be irritating, are not really a cause for concern much less malice. It doesn't require an evolutionary theory to realize that good, reasonable people can have conflicts of interest, and that the results of conflicts of interest can be devastating to the side that loses. My view is that modern evolutionary theory gives us a powerful way of understanding why this must be so. Anti-Semites have often portrayed Jews as the embodiment of evil.
Despite Derbyshire's claim, it is simply not the case that Jews have only been successful since "emancipation." Jews have very frequently achieved powerful positions: ancient Alexandria and the late Roman Empire; parts of Western Europe during the Middle Ages prior to the expulsions of Jews from most of Western Europe; the Turkish Empire after the fall of the Byzantine Christians and many other places where Jews served alien ruling elites, especially in the Muslim world (e.g., Spain after the Muslim conquest); Christian Spain beginning at least by the late 14th century and extending well into the period of the Inquisition; Poland and other areas of Eastern Europe beginning in the early modern period and extending into the 20th century.10 Perhaps most notably, the elite status of Jews in the Soviet Union had little or nothing to do with the opportunities made available by the Enlightenment, since the Enlightenment had little impact on the Russian Empire.
Derbyshire rejects my argument that without Jewish involvement, the Bolshevik Revolution and its horrific aftermath would not have happened. The percentage of Jews in early Bolshevik Party congresses is irrelevant to this issue. The questions I ask are: Would the Revolution have occurred without the key involvement of a relatively small number of very talented Jews like Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, and Uritsky who played such prominent roles in the Bolshevik Revolution and the early Soviet government? (In the same way, one can reasonably ask whether the neo-conservative revolution in U.S. foreign policy would have happened without the critical contributions of Richard Perle, William Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Elliott Abrams, and David Wurmser, to name only some of the most prominent Jews involved. Small numbers of highly talented, closely cooperating people can have enormous influence.) Would the Revolution have been sustainable in its early stages without the involvement of large sections of the Jewish community who came to staff the Soviet bureaucracy, most notably the Secret Police? Were the most powerful non-Jews accurately described as philo-Semites â€” "Jewified non-Jews," to use Albert S. Lindemann's term?11 Were Jews an elite group in the Soviet Union at least until anti-Jewish attitudes began to be government policy after World War II? Did Jewish Communists and other leftists in the Soviet Union and elsewhere identify as Jews? I see no reason to change my views on these issues as a result of Derbyshire's comments.
Similarly, Derbyshire states that Jews "were not the sole, nor even the prime, movers in [the] downfall" of European dominance in the U.S. without providing a concrete alternative. I have never stated that Jewish intellectual movements and interest groups were the sole force, but I do indeed maintain that they were by far the most important. On the critical topic of immigration, there simply was no other force that energetically pursued the goal of multi-ethnic immigration in the period prior to 1965 apart from Jewish organizations or organizations composed partly of non-Jews that were funded, organized and staffed by Jews.12 I am scarcely alone in this opinion. Consider these comments of Vanderbilt University historian Hugh Davis Graham:
Most important for the content of immigration reform [i.e., loosening], the driving force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas. These included the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, and the American Federation of Jews from Eastern Europe. Jewish members of the Congress, particularly representatives from New York and Chicago, had maintained steady but largely ineffective pressure against the national origins quotas since the 1920s.... Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive was played by Jewish legislative leaders, such as Representative Celler and Senator Jacob Javits of New York. Less visible, but equally important, were the efforts of key advisers on presidential and agency staffs. These included senior policy advisers such as Julius Edelson and Harry Rosenfield in the Truman administration, Maxwell Rabb in the Eisenhower White House, and presidential aide Myer Feldman, assistant secretary of state Abba Schwartz, and deputy attorney general Norbert Schlei in the Kennedy-Johnson administration.
And beyond the transformations being wrought by the sea change in immigration policy, I think it inconceivable that the current regime of what Derbyshire terms "racial guilt, shame, apology, and recompense, accompanied by heroic efforts at social engineering ('affirmative action')" could have been built without the influence of the intellectual and political movements described in The Culture of Critique. As Derbyshire notes, this regime is inherently far less stable than what went before, and one can only shudder at what the future holds throughout the Western world.
Derbyshire does not think it hypocritical for Jews to promote multiculturalism in the U.S. while wishing to maintain Jewish ethnic dominance in Israel. The hypocrisy comes from the fact that, as I note in Chapter 8 of The Culture of Critique, the Jewish advocacy of Israel as a Jewish ethnostate coincided with a major effort by Jewish organizations and Jewish-dominated intellectual and political movements to supplant the prevailing view of the United States as a European Christian civilization with a European ethnic base. Especially hypocritical is that the disestablishment of the European basis of American identity was performed with appeal to universalist Enlightenment ideals of justice and individual rights, while it pathologized the ethnocultural basis of American civilization that had become an important foundation of American identity by the early decades of the 20th century. Although it is common for defenders of Israel to describe Israel as a democracy based on Western political ideals, I have yet to see any important Jewish organization or intellectual movement pathologize the ethnic basis of Israeli society or challenge the many ways in which Jewish ethnic interests are officially recognized in Israeli law and custom (e.g., the Law of Return). Indeed, the American Jewish community has been complicit in the ongoing ethnic warfare in the Middle East that has resulted in the dispossession, degradation, and large-scale murder of the Palestinians.
Derbyshire accuses me of being one of those who would prefer "a return to the older dispensation" â€” the older cultural and ethnic mix characteristic of the United States until the changes inaugurated in the last 35 years. I plead guilty to this charge. That regime was stable and it was good for people like me (and Derbyshire), and even for the American Jewish community who saw the modest, low-profile, non-violent character of anti-Jewish attitudes that were fairly common prior to World War II dwindle to irrelevance in the postwar period. Nothing wrong with that.
The dispossession of Europeans is the ultimate defeat â€” an evolutionary event of catastrophic proportions for people of European descent. Whatever the contributions of Jewish "entrepreneurs, jurists, philanthropists, entertainers, publishers, and legions upon legions of scholars," they could never make up for this cataclysmic loss and for the political instability and chronic ethnic tensions that have been unleashed by the Jewish intellectual and political movements discussed in The Culture of Critique. Further, as The Culture of Critique attempts to document, a very high percentage of the Jewish contribution to culture has been used to advance Jewish ethnic interests. The only exceptions are advances in technology and basic science, but does anyone seriously suppose that technological advances like the atomic bomb mentioned by Derbyshire would never have been discovered without Jews? (Germany, certainly, was very close.) It may be that these advances would have taken longer, but there is no question that they would have happened without Jews. After all, with a mean IQ of 100 and far larger numbers, European populations undoubtedly have far more individuals of the requisite IQ to make the stupendous contributions to culture that have occurred in recent centuries.
Western cultures have produced a long list of ethnically European geniuses in every field of science and art, from Plato and Aristotle down to the present. Pity the poor English who expelled the Jews in the Middle Ages and were thus restricted to the meager cultural contributions of Chaucer, Milton, Shakespeare, Newton, and Darwin even as they vastly expanded their numbers and the territory controlled by their people. Can anyone seriously suppose that the West would be unable to produce a brilliant high culture without Jews or that the Jewish contribution is of irreplaceable value?
-----The best way to defend ethnic interests is to defend a territory against immigration from other ethnic groups. The big story of immigration since World War II is of course that wealthy Western societies with economic opportunities and a high level of public goods, such as medical care and education, are magnets for immigration from around the world. We should never forget and should be immensely proud of the fact that Western societies act as magnets precisely because of the spectacular success of the peoples of European descent in creating the science and technology that is the basis for the incredible explosion of wealth and the breakthroughs in medicine and public health.
And it goes without saying that we should also be immensely proud of the extraordinary flowering of European high culture that has repeatedly produced geniuses like Bach, Beethoven, Wagner, and Shakespeare. Jewish pride in their own culture is of course a very important part of the Jewish tradition, and it certainly bears emulation. Sadly, a primary effect of the culture of critique has been to produce immense guilt among so many Europeans about their own culture, their own history, and their own people.
However, because Western societies act as very powerful magnets for immigration and because we have not acted to defend ourselves against this onslaught, the result will be displacement of the founding populations, not only in the United States, but also in Australia, Canada, and throughout the European Union. If present trends in the United States continue, the founding European-derived population is set to become a minority by the middle of this century; in the British Isles the submergence date is just two generations later.
European populations that are allowing themselves to be displaced are playing a very dangerous gameâ€”dangerous because the long history of ethnic strife provides them no guarantees about the future. Throughout history there has been a tendency for majority ethnic groups to oppress minorities. A glance at Jewish history is sufficient to make one realize the dangers faced by an ethnic group not having a state and political apparatus to protect its interests. The organized Jewish community in the United States is well aware of this and has adopted a two-pronged strategy: territorial defense and expansion of Israel as an ethnic homeland, and promoting the displacement and disempowerment of European populations in the Western world. Both of these projects have had a considerable degree of success.
It does not take an overactive imagination to see that coalitions of minority groups could compromise the interests of formerly dominant European groups. We already see numerous examples in which coalitions of minority groups attempt to influence public policy, including immigration policy, against the interests of the European majority. And we must realize that placing ourselves in a position of vulnerability would be extremely risky, given the deep sense of historical grievance harbored by many ethnic activists toward Europeans.
The best way to preserve ethnic interests is to defend an ethnostateâ€”a nation that is explicitly intended to preserve the ethnic interests of its citizens. From an ethnic point of view, a major problem with massive immigration is that there is likely to be an increase in ethnic competition. Multicultural societies sanction ethnic mobilization because they inevitably become a cauldron of competing ethnic interests.
In this very dangerous game of ethnic competition, some ethnic groups are better prepared than others. Ethnic groups differ in intelligence and the ability to develop and control economic resources. They differ in their degree of ethnocentrism, in the extent to which they are mobilized to achieve group interests, and in how aggressively they behave toward other groups. They differ in their numbers, fertility, and the extent to which they encourage responsible parenting. And they differ in the amount of land and other resources held at any point in time and in their political power.
Given these differences, itâ€™s difficult at best to ensure peaceful relations among ethnic groups. Even maintaining a status quo in territory and resource control is very difficult, as can be seen by the ill-fated attempts of Americans to achieve an ethnic status quo with the 1924 immigration law.18 And accepting a status quo would not be in the interests of groups that have recently lost land or numbers; nor is it likely to be acceptable to groups with relatively low numbers and control of resources; nor would a status quo be likely to be acceptable to groups prone to high fertility. Yet the alternativeâ€”that all humans renounce their ethnic group loyaltiesâ€”seems utopian to say the least.
And given that some ethnic groupsâ€”especially ones with high levels of ethnocentrism and mobilizationâ€”will undoubtedly continue to function as groups far into the foreseeable future, unilateral renunciation of ethnic loyalties by some groups means only their surrender and defeatâ€”the Darwinian dead end of extinction. The future, then, like the past, will inevitably be a Darwinian competition in which ethnicity plays a very large role.
The alternative faced by Europeans throughout the Western world is to place themselves in a position of enormous vulnerability in which their destinies will be determined by other peoples, many of whom hold deep historically conditioned hatreds toward them. Europeansâ€™ promotion of their own displacement is the ultimate foolishnessâ€”an historical mistake of catastrophic proportions.
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
I am passing this on to you because it definitely worked for me and we all could use more calm in our lives.
By following the simple advice I heard on a Medical TV show, I have actually finally found inner peace.
A Doctor proclaimed the way to achieve inner peace is to finish all the things you have started.
So I looked around my house to see things I started and hadn't finished;
....... and, before leaving the house this morning,........... I finished off a bottle of Merlot, a bottle of Cardonay , a bole of Baileys, a butle of Kehuha, a pockage of Prunglies, tha mainder of bot Prozic and Valum scriptins, the res of the Chesescke, an a bax a cholates.
Yu haf no idr who gud I fel.
Peas sen dis orn to dem yu fee AR in ned ov inr pece= hic!
I'm sure this only just applies to you, but it made me smile . . . .
BORN BEFORE 1986?
Martha recently lost her husband.
She had him cremated and brought his Ashes home.
Picking up the urn that he was in, she poured him out on the patio table.
Then, while tracing her fingers in the ashes, she started talking to him.
"Frank, you know that dishwasher you promised me?
I bought it with the insurance money!"
She paused for a minute tracing her fingers in the ashes then said, "Frank, Remember that car you promised me?
Well, I also bought it with the insurance money!"
Again, she paused for a few minutes and while tracing her fingers in the Ashes she said, "Frank, that diamond ring you promised me?
Bought it too, With the insurance money!"
Finally, still tracing her fingers in the ashes, She said, "Frank, remember that blow job I promised you?"
"Here it comes !"
Saturday, March 17, 2007
This must be one of the saddest sites i have ever had the misfortune to come across. I will try to post a comment as an earlier attempt didn't get anywhere. Can't believe you are attacking Pete Barker after all the hard work and dedication he has put in to nationalism throughout the years. Many of you he called his friend at one time or another and this is how you treat him. Pathetic, threatening phone calls and a few dodgy e mails. I've heard Pete keeps a record of everything so watch out fellas! And he lives nearby as well! See you all soon!
I shake my head.
Judge Abdel-Rahman presided over the trial of Saddam Hussein and his co-defendants in Iraq to not show enlarge option
Raouf Abdel-Rahman handed John Reid's department one of its most politically sensitive decisions after coming to the UK with his family on a visitors visa because he feared for his life.
Mr Abdel-Rahman, who is of Kurdish origin, is thought to have arrived with his family two weeks before Saddam was hanged on December 30 last year.
“He fears for his life and the lives of family members”, Nasser al-Badri of Al Jazeera TV said.
Judges are regularly targeted by insurgents in Iraq. The Iraqi High Tribunal saw three of Saddam's defence lawyers murdered, as well as a few of the IHT's own staff.
Mr Abdel-Rahman, who headed the Supreme Iraq Criminal Tribunal that heard the dictator’s trial for genocide, also sentenced other top aides of the former Iraqi dictator to death.
Any person claiming asylum must be able to demonstrate that he or she has a “well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion" in their country of nationality or former country of residence.
Tonight the whereabouts of Mr Abdel-Rahman and his family were not known, but he is likely to be under close protection.
Dashty Jamal, of the International Federation of Iraqi Refugees, said: “The fleeing of Judge Raouf to the UK has proved that the Iraqi government is unable to protect anyone in Iraq and is not representing the Iraqi people”.
He added: “Judge Raouf has left Iraq because of the political crisis in Iraq.”
Basam Ridha Al-Hussaini, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's liason to the Iraqi High Tribunal, insisted that the judge had requested a 30-day holiday from the government, which he was enjoying in England.
"He didn't apply for political asylum in England. He requested 30 days off. He is enjoying a vacation with his family in England," Hussaini said. "I talked with him myself. I've been talking with him on a daily basis."
He said the judge didn't want to speak to the media and felt he had no need to defend himself.
The number of Iraqi asylum applicants in the UK in 2006, excluding dependents, was 850 compared with 1414 in 2005 and 1695 in 2004. In the last three months of 2006 Iraq was sixth in the top ten applicant nationalities with Iran in top position.
Mr Abdel-Rahman, who took over the trial after the resignation of the former chief judge Rizgar Amin, was born in the Kurdish town of Halabja, where 5,000 residents were killed in 1988 after Saddam’s forces launched a chemical gas attack on the town in the deadliest chemical weapons attack since the First World War.
With his more hardline approach to the defendants and their conduct at the trial, the judge presided over some of the most dramatic moments in the courtroom, featuring at the centre of several stormy exchanges with Saddam, including the moment the former dictator’s death sentence was declared.
That particular exchange saw Mr Abdel-Rahman attempting to read out the penalty as Saddam shouted: “Down with the invaders. God is great.... To hell with your articles and clauses...”
Friday, March 16, 2007
Top Four Adult Jokes :-) :-)!!!
A man bumps into a woman in a hotel lobby and as he does, his elbow goes into her breast.They are both quite startled.
The man turns to her and says, "Ma'am, if your heart is as soft as yourbreast, I know you'll forgive me."
She replies, "If your penis is as hard as your elbow, I'm in room 221."
Third Place :
One night, as a couple lays down for bed, the husband starts rubbing hiswife's arm.The wife turns over and says "I'm sorry honey, I've got a gynecologist appointment tomorrow and I want to stay fresh."
The husband, rejected, turns over.
A few minutes later, he rolls back over and taps his wife again.
"Do you have a dentist appointment tomorrow too?"
Bill worked in a pickle factory. He had been employed there for a number of years when he came home one day to confess to his wife that he had aterrible compulsion. He had an urge to stick his penis into the pickleslicer.
His wife suggested that he should see a sex therapist to talk about it, but Bill said he would be too embarrassed.
He vowed to overcome the compulsion on his own.
One day, a few weeks later, Bill came home and his wife could see at oncethat something was seriously wrong.
"What's wrong, Bill?" she asked.
"Do you remember that I told you how I had this tremendous urge to put my penis into the pickle slicer?"
"Oh, Bill, you didn't" she exclaimed."Yes, I did." he replied.
"My God, Bill, what happened?"
"I got fired."
"No, Bill. I mean, what happened with the pickle slicer?"
"Oh...she got fired too."
A couple had been married for 50 years.
They were sitting at the breakfast table one morning when the wife says,” Just think, fifty years ago we were sitting here at this breakfast table together."
"I know," the old man said.
"We were probably sitting here naked as a jaybird fifty years ago."
"Well," Granny snickered. "Let's relive some old times."
Where upon, the two stripped to the buff and sat down at the table.
"You know, honey," the little old lady breathlessly replied, "My nipples are as hot for you today as they were fifty years ago."
"I wouldn't be surprised," replied Gramps.
"One's in your coffee and the other is in your oatmeal ".
Do you use The Bacon Fat ?
We were raised on bacon grease (lard) as kids and even into adulthood.
I loved my bread fried in it!
I will never use it again.
I hope you will throw yours away whenever
you fry bacon from now on.
It seems as though nothing is safe to eat anymore.
This is what happens when you keep cooking with bacon grease. This is a warning, send this to everyone you care about.
It could happen to you...
Because Bacon Fat... make's your feet small!!
So please Warn everyone!!
There once was an Indian who had only one testicle, and whose given name was 'Onestone'. He hated that name and asked everyone not to call him Onestone. After years and years of torment, Onestone finally cracked and said, "If anyone calls me Onestone again I will kill them!"
The word got around and nobody called him that any more
Then one day a young woman named Blue Bird forgot and said, "Good morning, Onestone." He jumped up, grabbed her and took her deep into the forest where he made love to her all day and all night. He made love to her all the next day, until Blue Bird died from exhaustion.
The word got around that Onestone meant what he promised he would do.
Years w ent by and no one dared call him by his given name until a woman named Yellow Bird returned to the village after being away.
Yellow Bird, who was Blue Bird's cousin, was overjoyed when she saw Onestone. She hugged him and said, "Good to see you, Onestone."
Onestone grabbed her, took her deep into the forest, then he made love to her all day, made love to her all night, made love to her all the next day, made love to her all the next night, but Yellow Bird wouldn't die!
What is the moral of this story?............ OH, come on...take a guess!
Think about it (You're going to love this!)
And the moral is .......
You can't kill two birds with one stone!!
Jack from Rochdale.............
Thursday, March 15, 2007
ACTION COMES AS GROUP MEETS IN WASHINGTON