Dave Whelan is just some victorian capitalist who should be placed back in that era, but as a poor wretch.
Saturday, December 30, 2006
Dave Whelan is just some victorian capitalist who should be placed back in that era, but as a poor wretch.
AT THE local elections last May the British National Party gained 34 new councillors.
The United Kingdom Independence Party didn't gain any - in fact UKIP only managed to top the poll in one council seat.In the seven local council elections where BNP and UKIP candidates have gone head-to-head since May, the BNP has beaten UKIP in six of them, polling twice as many votes.
With David Cameron's Conservative Party targeting its policies towards the Centre-Left of British politics in order to attract Lib-Dem voters, the silent majority of British voters have been left unrepresented by the three main parties.The British National Party's chairman Nick Griffin, knows the local elections on May 3rd are vital for both the BNP and those Britons who still hold dear our traditional family and Christian values."We need to get a large number of British National Party councillors elected", he told Freedom."
As many councils as possible need to have a BNP councillor to alert the public when anti-British policies are being pushed through by councillors from the three main parties."In the run-up to these elections we need all the help we can get and that is why I'm asking UKIP members and supporters to come and join us and help us in our great electoral push on behalf of the British people."The BNP is the Party of the moment.
We have the momentum and that is why Labour and the Tories are running scared of us. We have proved that we can win seats anywhere, from the North to the South.
"If experienced and committed campaigners channel their efforts on UKIP campaigns and candidates that can't possibly win, it is a wasted effort and one that harms the interests of the British people."To these people I say, come and join us. Come and stand as BNP candidates or join our campaign teams to ensure that the British people have a voice on councils across the country."
And Nick Griffin makes no apologies for this courting of UKIP members and supporters."I have met them at elections - out canvassing and at the counts. They are good people, very good people and we would welcome their contributions to our campaigns. The situation our country faces is much too serious to let minor differences deflect from out efforts in May."
NWN: Unfortunately this writer can remember when Griffin and his 'sidekick' at that time, Dr. Mark Deavin said ; "they were going to offer the UKIP up on a plate" to the BNP, this was circa 1998, he/they, sounded plausible. We all know that Griffin has 'had the hots for money' these last few years, in a very big way.
But when we know that any nationalists who have any 'nous' or talent, have been expelled from the BNP.
When we know that Griffin has sidelined any who have genuine nationalist sympathies.
When we know that even people like historian David Irving and his supporter Lady Renouf are cast as extremists by one who wrote the booklet THE MINDBENDERS - about the zionist jewish conspiracy to rule the World, only a few years ago.
Excuse me when I want to be sick !
Just whom is being offered up to whom ?
So, zum Abschluß dieses Jahres melden wir uns noch einmal. In den letzten 6Wochen haben sich die Ereignisse im musikalischen Bereich gerade zuüberschlagen. Neu reinbekommen haben wir u.a.
Confident of Victory - The unfeeling Racial Purity - Last Ways of Humenity (nur 7.50 Euro!)HKL - Eine Dekade des HassesArische Jugend - Von Trotz und TreueTollschock / Tattoed Mother F*ckers - Tattoed, pissed & proud
My War - HeuchlerHate Soldiers & Race 'N' Nation - Split-CDRobert & Veit - Söhne WotansRadikahl - Um die Freyheit (demnächst auch bei uns erhältlich)Kategorie C - Wir sind in Form (ab 8.1. erhältlich)Weiterhin aktuell:Stahlgewitter - Auftrag Deutsches ReichSkalinger - Es hat begonnenHalgadom - SturmwogeTitania- Black Bloc&amp;#180;n RollA.N.O.S. - WissensmagazinViolence Ausgabe 2010 Euro - Aktion:Unsere 10 Euro pro CD - Aktion läuft zur Silvesternacht aus.
Das heißt, Ihrbekommt reguläre Vollalben zum Stückpreis von 10 Euro, wenn im Warenkorbmindestens 10 CDs liegen. Greift schnell zu, das Jahr ist bald zu Ende ;-)
Wir möchten auch noch einen kurzen Ausblick auf unsere nächsten bevorstehendenProduktionen werfen:den Anfang wird der Barde Nico mit seinem Debüt 'Schaffendes Deutschland'machen.
Für die Akustikgitarrenfraktion unter Euch eine interessante Sache.
Hörproben werden in Kürze auf unserer Seite hochgeladen.Anschließend wird das 2. Album von Final Stand (Nordfront - Projekt) erscheinen.Für Freunde englischsprachiger, abwechslungsreicher Musik ein Leckerbissen.
Laßt Euch überraschen.Zuletzt wird dann die neue Scheibe von Vollendung das Licht der Welt erblicken.Wir wünschen Euch einen guten Start ins neue Jahr 2007MkGRACordswww.racords.de0711 / 1603828
Thursday, December 28, 2006
WE need even more nationalist websites and blogs so that they cannot block us all.
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
How they tried to kick Richard Edmonds out of the BNP.
Known Labour Party 'whitecollar crook' gets top job over Rochdale, Heywood and Middleton NHS.
Ex Labour MP and NUS chief exposed as major zionist agent.
'That' secret list of areas that were expected to have rioted after 2001.
All these and more coming soon...........................
Sunday, December 24, 2006
He can see from her nameplate that her name is Patricia Whack.
"Miss Whack, I'd like to get a $30,000 loan to take a holiday."
Patty looks at the frog in disbelief and asks his name.
The frog says his name is Kermit Jagger, his dad is Mick Jagger, and that it's okay, he knows the bank manager.
Patty explains that he will need to secure the loan with some collateral.
The frog says, "Sure . I have this," and produces a tiny porcelain elephant, about an inch tall, bright pink and perfectly formed.
Very confused, Patty explains that she'll have to consult with the bank manager and disappears into a back office.
She finds the manager and says, "There's a frog called Kermit Jagger out there, who claims to know you, and wants to borrow $30,000, and he wants to use this as collateral."
She holds up the tiny pink elephant.
"I mean, what in the world is this?"..........
The bank manager looks back at her and says, ..."It's a knick-knack, Patty Whack. Give the frog a loan. His old man's a Rolling Stone."
Saturday, December 23, 2006
Jews Behind Negro Push
12/22/2006 4:15:13 PM
Dalhousie University, University -- Anti-black philo-Semite Jared Taylor's appearance at Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia, Canada, has been cancelled after nigger Professor David Divine, who invited Taylor, decided he was "too offensive" to have his views aired on campus.
Taylor is a suit and tie intellectual and former international banker whose organization, American Renaissance, claims that Jews and Asians are more intelligent than whites and that blacks and Hispanics are lower on the racial scale. His organization is backed by a number of conservative Jews, including Rabbi Meyer Schiller, who is also allied with Nick Griffin, VDARE, and, reportedly, with Stormfront. A full expose on this portion of the "white nationalist" movement will appear in the February 2007 issue of National Socialist.
Divine said that, rather than debate Taylor, he will debate himself that night on the issue of "diversity", and attempt to present "Taylor's views".
Divine is one of Canada's rare black Negro residents. Most of Canadian non- white immigration is from Asian countries -- a phenomenon Taylor approves of.
Canada's government is controlled to an extreme degree by Jewish interests, who have outlawed most form of political dissent. One Jewish company owns almost all of Canada's print media, and the Jewish Mossad has a closer relationship with Canada and its government than it does even in the United States.
NWN: This site has warned about the likes of Nick Griffin , Jared Taylor and Rabbi Meyer Schiller, many times in the past.These crooks are poisoning the white nationalist atmosphere. They try to use 'clever words', as they know that many white nationalists are not academically trained. AMREN was the prototype for Griffins BNP.
Thankfully, David Duke says it for real.
We must declare war on the reactionaries 'within the movement' !
Friday, December 22, 2006
Tears of joy as Muslims win mosque battle
Cheers met the decision taken at the planning meeting of Ribble Valley Council in Clitheroe, as about 150 locals, both for and against, attended the town hall meeting amid a heavy police presence.
NWN: Who were the stupid white women that were cheering this decision ? No doubt most were Labour Party/socialist marxist scum. Names please for this website.
Holocaust Jew accused of war crimes
Berlin July 11, 2005
An old Jewish man who took his own cold-blooded revenge against Germans for the Holocaust will not be extradited back to Poland from Israel to answer charges of genocide.
The case of Solomon Morel, 86, is the only one in Holocaust history where a Jew stands accused of war crimes against Germans.
It has perplexed legal minds in both countries. Poland says genocide is genocide whether a Jew or a Nazi committed it, while many Israelis see rough justice in the 1500 German deaths for which Mr Morel is alleged to be responsible.
Now the Israeli Government has said that Mr Morel will not be sent back to stand trial in Poland under any circumstances.
Mr Morel, who came from the little Polish town of Grabowo, claims he was an Auschwitz survivor whose family was murdered by the Nazis during World War II. A book, An Eye for an Eye, which documents his strange life, claims his family was indeed liquidated, but by Poles who collaborated with the Nazis. It also says that he was never imprisoned by the Germans.
By 1943 he was employed peeling potatoes for a Jewish partisan brigade before escaping to the Soviet Union, where he trained in the gruesome interrogation methods of the NKVD, Stalin's political police, before returning to Poland in 1945. He was then put in charge by the communists of a camp containing thousands of German prisoners including SS men, soldiers and civilians.
John Sack, the Jewish-American author of An Eye for an Eye, claims Mr Morel, as commandant of Swietochlowice Camp, morphed into the kind of monster that would have been welcomed by the Gestapo.
"His favourite method of killing prisoners was hacking the skull of his victims with a wooden leg of a chair," according to the book. "It is quite possible that in Swietochlowice several thousand persons were murdered by Morel and his men.They would beat them and throw the bodies out of the window."Camp survivor.
Sack's book, and a score of Polish books and newspaper articles, said he beat, shot, starved, tortured and killed with gusto in the camp.
"I knew Morel in the camp. He was a very brutal man," survivor Dorota Boriczek said. "He was young then. He would come in at night. We could hear the cries of the men then. They would beat them and throw the bodies out of the window."
In 1989, a Polish reporter found Mr Morel living in a part of Katowice assigned for former uniformed functionaries of communist terror.
In the early 1990s, the Main Commission for the Investigations of Crimes Against the Polish Nation started an official investigation of Mr Morel's activities in the Swietochlowice Camp after witness articles appeared in the press.
In 1994, Mr Morel sought political asylum in Sweden. This was refused. He then successfully sought sanctuary in Israel.
Poland tried to extradite him seven years ago on torture charges. Israel refused. So prosecutors began preparing a genocide case, for which there is no statute of limitations.
Last week, they received a blank refusal from Israel saying "there was no basis whatsoever" to extradite Mr Morel.
A Polish prosecutor said testimony from former inmates documented Mr Morel's torture of at least 13 prisoners.
"There should be one measure for judging war criminals, irrespective whether they are German, Israeli, or any other nationality," the prosecutor said.
If you receive an email entitled "Bedtimes" delete it IMMEDIATELY.
Do not open it .
Apparently this one is pretty nasty.
It will not only erase everything on your hard drive,but it will also delete anything on disks within 20 feet of your computer. It demagnetizes the strips on ALL of your credit cards. It reprograms your ATM access code, screws up the tracking on your VCR, and uses subspace field harmonics to scratch any CD's you attempt to play.It will program your phone auto dial to call only 0898 numbers. This virus will mix anti-freeze into your fish tank.
IT WILL CAUSE YOUR TOILET TO FLUSH WHILE YOU ARE SHOWERING.
It will drink ALL your beer.
FOR GOD'S SAKE, ARE YOU LISTENING??
It will leave dirty underwear on the coffee table when you are expecting company. It will replace your shampoo with Nair and your Nair with Rogaine. If the"Bedtimes" message opened in a Windows 95/98 environment, it will leave the toilet seat up and leave your hair dryer plugged in dangerously close to a full bathtub.
It will not only remove the forbidden tags from your mattresses and pillows, it will also refill your skim milk with whole milk.
And if you don't send this to 5000 people in 20 seconds, you'll fart so hard that your right leg will spasm and shoot straight out in front of you, sending sparks that will ignite the person nearest you. Send this warning to everyone!!!
THERE'S A LOT OF SADNESS IN THE WORLD!
Right now, as you read this, 17 Million people are having SEX!!!
And look at you -you're on the bloody computer!!!!
Vote Le Pen !
Now we know where traitor Nick Griffin gets his race mixing ideas from . This sort of stuff is not nationalist, it is reactionary conservative ! And exactly the reason why Griffin is taking the money off the Barbara Amiels of this World, the zionist powerbrokers, the multinationalists, the internationalists.
Thursday, December 21, 2006
U.S. and Britain to Add Ships to Persian Gulf in Signal to Iran
NY Times, 12/21/06WASHINGTON, Dec. 20 — The United States and Britain will begin moving additional warships and strike aircraft into the Persian Gulf region in a display of military resolve toward Iran that will come as the United Nations continues to debate possible sanctions against the country, Pentagon and military officials said Wednesday.
The officials said that Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates was expected this week to approve a request by commanders for a second aircraft carrier and its supporting ships to be stationed within quick sailing distance of Iran by early next year.
Senior American officers said the increase in naval power should not be viewed as preparations for any offensive strike against Iran. But they acknowledged that the ability to hit Iran would be increased and that Iranian leaders might well call the growing presence provocative.
One purpose of the deployment, they said, is to make clear that the focus on ground troops in Iraq has not made it impossible for the United States and its allies to maintain a military watch on Iran.
That would also reassure Washington’s allies in the region (NWN:Israel) who are concerned about Iran’s intentions. The officials said the planned growth in naval power in the gulf and surrounding waters would be useful in enforcing any sanctions that the United Nations might impose as part of Washington’s strategy to punish Iran for what it sees as ambitions to acquire nuclear weapons.
And the buildup would address another concern: that Iran could try to block oil shipments from the gulf in retaliation for United Nations sanctions or other American-led pressure.
Ian Cobain went undercover for seven months to explore the clandestine world of the BNP: how it operates, recruits and holds meetings
Ian CobainThursday December 21, 2006
Early one evening in October, outside an entrance to Liverpool Street station in London, a few dozen men and women are standing around in small groups, whispering into mobile telephones, shuffling their feet, smiling and nodding discreetly to one another.
It is unseasonably warm, and people are spilling onto the pavement from the Hamilton Hall, a pub a few yards away. It's also a Saturday, and throngs of noisy football supporters are weaving in and out of the station on their way home from matches around the capital.
The small groups of men and women become larger, gradually merge into one company. But they blend in beautifully with the people around them; nobody sees their congregation, nobody else notices that they are one.
These people are using what they call an RVP - a clandestine rendezvous point. And if it sounds like an extraordinarily secretive way to meet your friends on a Saturday evening, that's exactly what it is supposed to be.
But then, these are people who will use pseudonyms to conceal their true identities. Their emails are encrypted, with only the chosen few possessing the codes needed to decipher their messages. They are people who employ carefully-coded language to express their views, and who will, before speaking plainly, quite literally look over their shoulders.
This is the strange world of what may be the United Kingdom's fastest-growing political party: these people have proclaimed themselves to be the Torch-Bearers of British Culture, the guardians of our national identity.
Welcome to life inside the British National Party.
The first meeting
My first meeting with a BNP activist was in the Amato Cafe in Soho's Old Compton Street on September 7. His name was Steve Tyler, he was slightly scruffy, and he had a goatee beard and dyed hair. He must have been about 60. His companion was a young Brazilian woman. They were obviously close. As she left, and our meeting began, Steve muttered something about his friend wanting help bringing her sister into the country. That was my first surprise. The second came when Steve admitted that he is not British at all: he is Australian.
Despite this, Steve clearly regards immigration as the greatest problem facing his adopted home. "The whole world is pouring down on us," he said. "It's a huge problem, and it's going to get worse." Not that he is a racist, you understand - "I'm on the liberal wing of the party ... most of the people in the party are" - and he doesn't blame the immigrants themselves - "if I was a 19-year-old Kurd, I'd be trying to get into the country". It's just that there is such a deluge, he explains. And really, something must be done about it! "I don't want to be lying on my deathbed thinking that I could have done something about it, but didn't."
For generations people like Steve have struggled to capture more than a tiny percentage of the votes at local or general elections. That has begun to change following Nick Griffin's attempts to clean up the BNP's image since becoming chairman seven years ago. In last May's local elections the party won 229,000 votes and now has more than 50 council seats.
To put this in some context, around seven million votes were cast last May, and 364,000 people voted for the Green party. But support for the BNP is clearly growing. In some parts of the country - in areas of West Yorkshire and East Lancashire, in pockets of the Midlands and on the eastern outskirts of London - the extreme right has achieved the political legitimacy which has eluded it for generations. It is also recruiting new members hand over fist.
But what sort of people are now joining the party? What is its electoral strategy? Is it dedicated purely to the pursuit of democratic politics? And where is it obtaining its funds? In an attempt to answer these questions, and to take a glimpse behind Griffin's facade of normality, the Guardian decided that it would join the BNP.
I signed up under an assumed name last June, using a fake address in central London from which I could pick up BNP correspondence, a new email account and a dedicated mobile telephone. I was keen to become active, I said on my application form, but I wanted to remain behind the scenes.
In my first meetings with BNP activists I hinted heavily that I worked in the public sector, and could lose my job if my membership became known. Over the months that followed, there would be times when members would question me closely about my views and my background, and it would be unclear to me whether they were merely curious, or suspicious. Before most meetings I would feel some fear of exposure. But when asked about my work, I found I could reply, quite truthfully: "Trust me, if you knew what I did for a living, you would understand exactly why it is that I can't tell you."
Who is watching?
After talking about my "work for the government", Steve turned to the question of police surveillance. "The police will watch leading members, of course, but they can't watch everybody who joins. They're too busy watching Islamic terrorists these days. And it's no secret that most police officers probably support us. Certainly those working in central London know the problems we face ..."
The problems we face. I heard phrases like this uttered by BNP members many times and, after several months, came to understand their precise, nuanced meanings. "Nice areas" I quickly understood to signify predominantly white areas. "Quiet areas" are places where black and minority ethnic people live, but keep a low profile, and don't compete too hard for jobs, school places or sexual partners. "Troublesome areas" are places where black people do just the opposite. "No-go areas" are places where black and minority ethnic people are in a majority. "Ethnics" speaks for itself, as does "our people". And "the problems we face"? They are, quite simply, that there are black people living among us whites.
In my seven months as a party member I heard very few racist epithets, and no anti-semitic comments. Such language appears almost to be frowned upon in Griffin's post-makeover BNP. Perhaps it is a tribute to the Race Relations Act 1976 and the Public Order Act 1986, and to the gently shifting mores of British life, that racists rarely feel able to express themselves, even among like-minded people. But some of the fear and the hatred remains: it just emerges in code.
The Orange Tree pub
On the evening of Sunday September 24 I was sitting in the Orange Tree pub in Richmond, south-west London, opposite a man who had contacted me by email. He had told me that his name was Nick Russell, and that he was the London regional organiser for the BNP. One these statements was true; the other I knew to be a lie.
Nick is indeed a dedicated party activist. His real name, however, is Nick Eriksen. He is 47, a former civil servant, and he once served as a Tory councillor in Southwark, south London. An intense man, with bitten nails and a permanent frown, he appears forever to be on the brink of losing his temper. His complaints that night were endless: the sale of a local real-ale brewery, the iniquity of Britain's divorce laws, interference from Brussels and, of course, immigration. "Yes, I suppose if I was a half-starved Somali goat-herd, I would want to come to Britain ... the South Africans will never stage a proper World Cup, how could they? It's a black country. They've got the infrastructure the whites left them, but it's a mess now ... I hear there are a hundred thousand Bulgarians and Romanians waiting to get in ... I would have thought the number of people we had living in Britain in the 1930s or 40s was the optimum population." And so it goes on.
Nick, I discover in time, is an almost archetypal BNP member. I had joined a party which draws in people who are not only xenophobic, but harassed and malcontented, people who feel themselves to be unfairly put-upon, to be slightly under siege. It is a party of people for whom British society, as it is and as it is developing, has no appeal, and no room.
It was also a party which was about to appoint a Guardian journalist to one of its key positions.
Nick was looking for a central London organiser. He already had almost a dozen district organisers working under him, in different parts of the capital, but central London had been neglected for years. The party had decided to bring its members living in central London into one branch, and then get some of them active: distributing leaflets, writing to newspapers, contesting council byelections.
The party, Nick explained, is particularly keen to gain a foothold in the Greater London Assembly. The next elections to the assembly, in 2008, will be held under a proportional representation system, and the BNP will capture a seat if it wins just five per cent of the vote. "Around 7% or 8 % will give us two seats, which would be good, as it could be a bit lonely for just one person."
Nick explained that the lists of local members and former members would be sent to me in encrypted emails. He slid a brown envelope across the table: inside was a CD which held the software which would enable me to decode them. He also asked me to write down the elaborate password I must use with the software: "the KING was born on 31 FEBRUARY."
It will also be my job to organise social events four times a year: "We'll tell you which venues you should use." And one last matter: Nick thinks that perhaps I should use a pseudonym, just to be on the safe side. "Why not? It's not against the law. It's a free country." I could even use it when meeting other BNP members. Nobody need ever know my real name. Nick suggests I call myself Ian Taylor.
A couple of months later, when Nick eventually tells me his real name, he explains that he adopted his pseudonym because he is an English teacher. (An inordinate number of members claim to be teachers, or retired teachers, or married to teachers - I'm never sure whether they are telling the truth.)
"It's ludicrous that you could lose your job for being a member of the party," he says. "But there's nothing wrong with using another name. We have a long tradition in this country of using different names. George Orwell wasn't really George Orwell. Cliff Richard isn't Cliff Richard."
Before I leave the Orange Tree, we are joined by Chris Forster, who stood as a BNP candidate in Richmond at the last council elections. A rather raffish-looking Cockney in his 60s, Chris explains that he was a National Front supporter in the 1970s. He talks about a number of murders and child sex attacks which he hears are happening in West Yorkshire, which are being ignored by the media, and which - we are expected to understand - have been committed by Asians.
Nick and Chris agree that the news from such areas is unremittingly depressing. "And that's not to mention Lambeth." From time to time they become so despondent about "the problems we face" that they fall silent and just shake their heads. Nevertheless, they insist that it is a great time to be joining the BNP. The party is completely skint, it seems, but they assure me that more and more people are joining every day. Up to 100 new members a week. An electoral breakthrough must be just over the horizon. It must be!
Tomorrow, it seems, belongs to us.
Central London organiser
Shortly after this, Sadie Graham, the BNP's Group Development Officer, writes from Nottingham to thank me for becoming the central London organiser and to offer advice. This includes the suggestion that I contact my "regional security officer" before holding any meetings.
From York, the party's Group Support Officer, Ian Dawson, telephones to give me details of my dedicated email account - email@example.com - which sits on the BNP server. He then sends me my password for the account: 27sortcode87.
The following week I receive an email with an encrypted attachment. Using the software from Nick, I open up the attachment to find it is an Excel spreadsheet listing 192 current and lapsed members living in the three central London boroughs, plus the north London boroughs of Camden and Islington. I am also sent a second list of people who have joined in the previous few months, or expressed an interest in joining. Someone has made notes against a handful of applicants' and members' names, observing that they appear to be of "Italian origin" or "Greek origin".
While some of the members of my new flock are from the BNP's traditional constituency - the white working class - there are also some scattered around some of the wealthiest areas of the capital, living in Chelsea townhouses, Belgravia mansions and apartments in Knightsbridge. They include dozens of company directors, computing entrepreneurs, bankers and estate agents, and a handful of teachers. One member is a former Miss England, another is the American chief executive of a City investment corporation, while one is a servant of the Queen, living at Buckingham Palace.
Among my members, I discover, is Simone Clarke, principal dancer with the English National Ballet. During a subsequent conversation, Ms Clarke says that she believes immigration "has really got out of hand", despite her partner, both on and off-stage, being a Cuban dancer of Chinese extraction. She adds: "If everyone who thinks like I do joined, it would really make a difference."
Another is Richard Highton, administrator of the Optical Consumer Complaints Service, which handles complaints about opticians. "Everyone you speak to is fed up and thinks the same," he says. "I would have thought central London is a breeding ground for discontent at what we have at the moment."
Then there is Peter Bradbury, a leading practitioner of complementary medicine and board member of the General Naturopathic Council, which works in partnership with a charity established by Prince Charles. He explains that he first joined the party many years ago, and was a friend of its late founder, John Tyndall.
Gregory Lauder-Frost, former political secretary of the Conservative Monday Club, the rightwing pressure group, emails to say he is unable to be an active member, as he spends most of his time at his home in the country.
And Annabel Geddes, the entrepreneur who created the London Dungeon and who became director of the London Tourist Board when she sold the business, apologises for having lapsed and promises to send a cheque to renew her membership. Annabel volunteers the opinion that Asian immigrants are a "bloody bore" while black people are "ghastly". "I'm a racist," she declares proudly. "We've got to keep little UK basically Anglo-Saxon."
She pauses, and asks whether I agree. "Well madam," I reply, "I am the central London organiser of the British National party ..."
T'WAS THE NIGHT BEFORE CHRISTMAS, HE LIVED ALL ALONE,
IN A ONE BEDROOM HOUSE MADE OF PLASTER AND STONE.
I HAD COME DOWN THE CHIMNEY, WITH PRESENTS TO GIVE,
AND TO SEE JUST WHO,IN THIS HOME, DID LIVE?
I LOOKED ALL ABOUT, A STRANGE SIGHT I DID SEE,
NO TINSEL, NO PRESENTS,NOT EVEN A TREE.
NO STOCKING BY MANTLE, JUST BOOTS FILLED WITH SAND, ON THE WALL HUNG PICTURES, OF FAR DISTANT LANDS.
WITH MEDALS AND BADGES, AWARDS OF ALL KINDS,
A SOBER THOUGHT, CAME THROUGH MY MIND.
FOR THIS HOUSE WAS DIFFERENT, IT WAS DARK AND DREARY,
I FOUND THE HOME OF A SOLDIER, ONCE I COULD SEE CLEARLY.
THE SOLDIER LAY SLEEPING, SILENT, ALONE,
CURLED UP ON THE FLOOR, IN THIS ONE BEDROOM HOME.
THE FACE WAS SO GENTLE, THE ROOM IN SUCH DISORDER,
NOT HOW I PICTURED,A YOUNG BRITISH SOLDIER.
WAS THIS THE HERO, OF WHOM I'D JUST READ?
CURLED UP ON A PONCHO, THE FLOOR FOR A BED?
I REALIZED THE FAMILIES, THAT I SAW THIS NIGHT,
OWED THEIR LIVES TO THESE SOLDIERS, WHO WERE WILLING TO FIGHT.
SOON ROUND THE WORLD, THE CHILDREN WOULD PLAY,
AND GROWNUPS WOULD CELEBRATE A BRIGHT CHRISTMAS DAY.
THEY ALL ENJOYED FREEDOM, EACH MONTH OF THE YEAR,
BECAUSE OF THE SOLDIERS LIKE THE ONE LYING HERE.
I COULDN'T HELP WONDER, HOW MANY LAY ALONE,
ON A COLD CHRISTMAS EVE, IN A LAND FAR FROM HOME.
THE VERY THOUGHT BROUGHT, A TEAR TO MY EYE,
I DROPPED TO MY KNEES, AND STARTED TO CRY.
THE SOLDIER AWAKENED, AND I HEARD A ROUGH VOICE,
"SANTA, DON'T CRY,THIS LIFE IS MY CHOICE;
I FIGHT FOR FREEDOM; I DON'T ASK FOR MORE,
MY LIFE IS MY GOD, MY COUNTRY, MY CORPS."
THE SOLDIER ROLLED OVER, AND DRIFTED TO SLEEP,
I COULDN'T CONTROL IT, I CONTINUED TO WEEP.
I KEPT WATCH FOR HOURS, SO SILENT AND STILL,
AND WE BOTH SHIVERED, FROM THE COLD NIGHT'S CHILL.
I DIDN'T WANT TO LEAVE, ON THAT COLD DARK NIGHT, THIS GUARDIAN OF HONOUR, SO WILLING TO FIGHT.
THEN THE SOLDIER ROLLED OVER, WITH A VOICE SOFT AND PURE,
WHISPERED, CARRY ON SANTA, IT'S CHRISTMAS DAY, ALL IS SECURE."
ONE LOOK AT MY WATCH, AND I KNEW HE WAS RIGHT.
"MERRY CHRISTMAS MY FRIEND, AND TO ALL A GOOD NIGHT."
This poem was written by a British Peacekeeping soldier stationed Overseas.
The following is his request. I think it is reasonable.
Christmas will be coming soon and some credit is due to all of the Servicemen and women for our being able to celebrate these festivities.
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Holocaust denier to be released
David Irving says he has changed his views on the HolocaustAn Austrian court has ruled that UK historian David Irving - jailed for denying the Holocaust - should be released on probation.
The court had heard calls for both a reduction and increase in the three-year sentence.
Irving was convicted in February in a case that sparked international debate about the limits of freedom of speech.
In 1989 he spoke in Austria denying the existence of gas chambers at Auschwitz, though he later said he was "mistaken".
Irving on Wednesday welcomed his release and said he was "fit and well".
He said he would urge an academic boycott of historians from Germany and Austria until the nations stopped jailing historians.
"I was put in prison for three years for expressing an opinion 17 years ago," he said.
The BBC's Kerry Skyring in Vienna said the presiding judge converted the remaining two years of Irving's jail term to a provisional sentence, upholding his appeal.
The conditions of the probation are not yet known, including whether Irving will be able to leave Austria.
Both the prosecution and defence had challenged the length of the sentence. The crime carries a prison term of up to 10 years.
The 1992 law targets "whoever denies, grossly plays down, approves or tries to excuse the National Socialist genocide".
Irving, 68, was arrested in November last year on a motorway in southern Austria. He was visiting to give a lecture to a far-right student fraternity.
The conviction had sparked intense debate with supporters saying it was fully justified but opponents arguing it undermined the right of freedom of speech.
At the initial trial, Irving had said it was "ridiculous" he was being tried for expressing an opinion and that he had changed his views on the Holocaust.
IF - YOU HAD NO WORRIES ?
IF - YOU CAME HOME AND THE FINEST MEAL IS AWAITING YOU ?
IF - YOUR BATHWATER HAD BEEN RUN ?
IF - YOU HAD THE PERFECT KIDS ?
IF - YOUR PARTNER WAS AWAITING YOU,WITH OPEN ARMS AND KISSES?
SO, WHERE WOULD YOU BE ?
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Holocaust-storm Rabbi defends Iran visit
Rabbi Ahron Cohen's Salford home was pelted with 1,000 eggs after he made his claims and he has requested police protection.
On Sunday more than 100 protesters - some throwing eggs - gathered outside his home.
Sunday, December 17, 2006
I learned a computer trick today that's really ingenious in its simplicity.
As you may know, when/if a worm virus gets into your computer it heads straight for your
email address book, and sends itself to everyone in there, thus infecting
all your friends and associates.
This trick won't keep the virus from getting into your computer, but it will stop it from using your address book to spread further, and it will alert you to the fact that the worm has gotten into your system.
Here's what you do:
First, open your address book and click on "new contact," just as you would do if you were adding a new friend to your list of email addresses. In the window where you would type your friend's first name, type in " A".
For the screen name or email address, type "AAAAAAA@AAA.AAA"
Now, here's what you've done and why it works:
The "name" " A" will be placed at the top of your address book as entry#1.
This will be where the worm will start in an effort to send itself to all your friends.
When it tries to send itself toAAAAAAA@AAA.AAA, it will be undeliverable because of the phony email address you entered. If the first attempt fails (which it will because of the phony address), the worm goes no further and your friends will not be infected.
Here's the second great advantage of this method: If an email cannot be delivered, you will be notified of this in your In Box almost immediately.
Hence, if you ever get an email telling you that an email addressed to AAAAAAA@AAA.AAA could not be delivered, you know right away that you have
the worm virus in your system.
You can then take steps to get rid of it!
Pretty slick huh?
If everybody you know does this then you need not ever worry about opening mail from friends.
1 cup water
1 cup of brown sugar
1 tsp baking soda
1 cup of sugar
1 tsp salt
4 large eggs
1 bottle of Vodka
1 can of Red Bull
2 cups dried fruit
1. Sample the vodka to check the quality.
2. Take a large bowl, check the vodka again.
3. To be sure it is of the highest quality, pour one level cup of vodka and mix with a little red bull and drink.
5. Turn on the electric mixer, beat one cup of butter in a large fluffy bowl.
6. Add one teaspoon of sugar. Beat again.
7. At this point its is best to make sure the vodka is still ok.
8. Flavour with red bull to taste.
9. Try another cup - just in case turn off the mixerer.
10. Break two leggs and add to the bowl and chuck in the cup of dried fruit.
11. Pick fruit off floor
12. Mix on the turner.
13. If the dried fruit gets stuck in the beaterers, pry it loose with a drewscriver.
14. Shample the vodka to check for tonsisticitity, flavour with a little Bed Rull.
15. Next ssiffft two cups of salt. Or something ... Who giveshz a shi**
16. Throw a pinch of Bed Rull over your shoulder
17. Pick up the can, mop the floor
18. Check the vodka
19. Now shift the lemon juice and strain your nuts.
20. Add one table.
21. Add a shpoon of shugar, or somefink. Whatever you can find.
22. Turn the cake tin 360 degrees and try not to fall over..
23. Don't forget to beat off the turner
24. Finally, throw the bowl through the window, finish the vodka and kick the dog.
25. Fall into bed.
The Dean Memorandum
Before the Suez records could be released to the public, officials had to decide how to deal with the Dean Memorandum. This document, consisting of seven typed pages, had been written by Sir Patrick Dean in 1978 on the advice of Lord Trend, the former Cabinet Secretary, following the publication of Selwyn Lloyd´s book on Suez.
The memorandum gave a full account of the meeting at Sèvres on 24 October 1956 and the hastily arranged visit to the Quai D´Orsay on the following day.
The purpose of the visit on 25 October, it was revealed, was to destroy all copies of the Protocol that Dean had initialled the previous day.
Written in French and typed in three copies, the Protocol set out in precise detail the plan agreed by the three governments to attack Egypt. In addition to Dean's signature, the Protocol bore the signatures of Christian Pineau, the French Foreign Minister, and David Ben-Gurion, the Prime Minister of Israel.
For Eden, the existence of the Protocol was a catastrophe: a smoking gun that exposed the full extent of collusion between Britain, France and Israel.
Once completed, the Dean Memorandum was locked away in the Cabinet Office, its existence confined to a select handful of officials.
It was not until 1986 that the question of its status was raised with Sir Anthony Acland, the new Permanent Under Secretary at the Foreign Office. Acland was informed that as part of the Suez review a number of particularly sensitive papers had been discovered; foremost amongst these was Dean´s memorandum.
In discussions with Sir Robert Armstrong, consideration was given to releasing the Dean Memorandum at the same time as the other Suez papers. There were two main arguments supporting this course of action.
First, no historical account of Suez would be complete without knowledge of the events described in the memorandum and its release would be in keeping with the spirit of the decision to release most papers relating to Suez immediately.
Second, knowledge of the memorandum, or a version of it, would damp down speculation that papers and records relating to the Sèvres meetings had been withheld or destroyed. Against this was the concern that Dean´s memorandum was not a contemporaneous record but had been written 22 years after the events it purported to describe. It was never intended to be an official document and the author, Sir Patrick Dean, would be 'horrified' if it was ever released.
If the arguments for and against release were finely balanced, there was no doubt that the memorandum was an important historical document and that the information it contained, if not the document itself, should be in the public domain. One means of achieving this objective was presented by the forthcoming biography of Eden by Robert Rhodes James, the Conservative MP for Cambridge, which was due to appear in the autumn. It was agreed that the Dean Memorandum should not be shown to James but that he should be encouraged to talk to Dean or Logan or both. The information about the second visit to Sèvres, which would appear in Rhodes James´s book, did not need to be attributed to them. Although, if asked about it following publication, they could confirm it was correct. In July 1986, James had lunch with Dean and Logan and prepared a passage to be included in his book. The paragraph appeared on page 532 of Rhodes James´s book and read as follows:
"The sequel of the meeting [Sèvres] was even more remarkable.
Eden was dismayed that any written documents existed, and ordered Dean and Logan to return to Paris on the 25th to destroy the record.
They were left for several hours by themselves, inside locked doors, in the Quai D´Orsay while the request was being considered.
They were eventually told by Pineau that the request had been refused, and that in any event a copy was already on its way to Israel. It did not require too much ingenuity to deduce that Pineau had been telephoning Tel Aviv.
At Eden´s insistence, the British copy of the ´Protocol´ was sent from the Foreign Office to 10 Downing Street, and has not survived, the others have .
Saturday, December 16, 2006
We just had to show this picture of this 'nice boy' who runs a radio show in the good old USA.
Any guesses as to his antecedence ?
It's about time we had a 'bit of a pop' at the local idiots who run chat shows on the radio right here in Lancashire .
We can think of one right now, that spouts marxist claptrap on Radio Manchester from 'morn till night', and who says he hails from Warrington - Alan Beswick.
Then we have that obscene pillock, James Stannage, who is forever getting rebukes and sacked for his hatred on the airwaves, but is still allowed to purvey his gobshite marxist claptrap. Stannage used to send hatemail to the Rochdale BNP mailbox in the early 1990's.
Then we had Stannages clone, James H Reeve. Just where do the broadcasting media get these totally marxist and unrepresentative idiots from ?
There is also some marxist idiot that sometimes drifts over the airwaves and the Pennines to Gods county Lancashire, is she called Alex Hall ?
Come on let's have the names and pictures of these marxist loudmouths that foul our countries airwaves.
A marxist that was on our list was Jim Hancock of BBC television, he was supposedly married to Labour party member Frances Done, the ex-Rochdale MBC Treasurer and Commonwealth games organiser.Hancock was OK when he worked for Piccadilly Radio in the late 1970's, then changed.
You have to watch this clip............... this is that 'earthshaker' .
So far it has been seen almost 50 000 times!
NWN: CNN cut out the introduction where Mr Blitzer called Mr Duke KKK leader 11 times.
WOLF BLITZER: Joining us now live from Tehran is the former Louisiana state representative, David Duke.Mr. Duke, thanks very much for coming in. What do you say to those who say — who charge, and there are many, that you’re there in Tehran at this Holocaust conference simply because you hate Jews?
DAVID DUKE: Well, first off, Mr. Blitzer, I resent the introduction you made of me. You mentioned the Ku Klux Klan 11 times. That was over 30 — well, 30 years ago in my life, and since that time I got elected to the House of Representatives, I became — and I received a full doctorate, I have been a teacher, I have one of the best selling books in the world.
And you interview many former communists in governments all over the world and you don’t introduce them by saying former communist and certainly not 11 times. I think you’re biased because you’re a former lobbyist for AIPAC. You’re a Jewish extremist, supporter of Israel, so you want to bias anyone who criticizes Zionism.
BLITZER: Well, do you hate Jews?
DUKE: No, I don’t. Do you hate people who don’t want to be controlled? Do you hate Americans who don’t want the Israeli lobby to have Americans fight and die and thousands maimed because Israel wants it in the Middle East? We have a war in Iraq because Israel wanted that war, not for American interests.
They lied to us about weapons of mass destruction, and now they’re trying to get America into war against Iran, and I think it would be a tragedy for this country, a tragedy for the world. And you don’t like what I say against Zionism so you want to talk about the Ku Klux Klan rather than the issues facing the world…
BLITZER: Do you…
DUKE: … the terrorism of the Israel state for instance.
BLITZER: Do you believe, Mr. Duke, that there was a Holocaust?
DUKE: I’m sorry? I believe, sir, that the only way we can know whether there was a Holocaust or the nature of it is freedom of speech. I don’t think we should be locking people in prison in Europe, even elderly people in their 80s, because they dare to have a different opinion about an historical event.
The American government shouldn’t be saying that the Iran conference — the Iran conference was a conference for freedom of speech. I heard many mainstream Holocaust speakers at this conference, many. This conference allowed freedom of speech on the issue.
The American government and Tony Blair and George Bush should be saying its a disgrace that David Irving, a worldwide historian with books in almost every library in the world, is in prison right now in Austria because he said something the Zionists don’t like about the Second World War.
BLITZER: Do believe in a two state solution to the Israeli- Palestinian conflict, a new state of Palestine living side by side with the state of Israel?
DUKE: I think that’s probably the best solution. I think you have to ask the people who live there, of both Israel and the Arab countries. But I know one thing. You can’t impose a solution from the Zionist’s domination of American foreign policy.
Pearl and people like Wolfowitz, Feith, Wurmser, Kristol, Abrams — we can go on and on. It sounds like a Jewish wedding.
They have set American policy and they have hurt American interests in the Middle East. Just as I have said for years, as Walt and Mearsheimer of Harvard have said, it’s a fact. And we are dying right now in Iraq because we’re there for Israel’s interests. We’ve gotten no oil out of this war. I said — I went around the world, around the country before this war, and said there were no weapons of mass destruction.
BLITZER: Well, let me interrupt for a moment, Mr. Duke. As far as I know, the president of the United States, who is the commander in chief, is not Jewish. The vice president of the United States is not Jewish. The secretary of defense is not Jewish. The national security advisor to the president, not Jewish. The director of the CIA, not Jewish. Are these people simply tools of the Zionist conspiracy?
DUKE: They’re not tools of a conspiracy, but they are definitely tools of the Zionist media and political power. Even the “Washington Post” said that 60 percent of the contributions for the Republican Party come from Jewish sources. Plus, if any politician in America dares to criticize Israel, millions will go to his opponents and he will be attacked in the media where Zionists have incredible power.
Even the “Jewish Chronicle,” the “Jewish Los Angeles Times” — excuse me, not the “Los Angeles Times,” the “Jewish Times of Los Angeles” stated that four of the five conglomerates of — the largest media conglomerates are owned by Jews, and the fifth is even more pro- Israel than some of those conglomerates. We have a controlled media in the United States, and that’s why we’re not hearing the truth about this conference.
This conference is about the fact that there must be freedom of speech. And this is insane that people are being criticized. This conference is being criticized when there are people in prison right now for freedom of their conscience.
BLITZER: If there’s a controlled…
DUKE: Now, if you think that David Irving should be in prison right now in Austria — I’m asking you a question, sir.
BLITZER: Well, I’m the one who asks the questions in these interviews…
DUKE: Do you think David Irving should be in prison in Austria for voicing an opinion?
BLITZER: … and we invited you on. And the question is…
BLITZER: … if we invited you on, why is there a Zionist conspiracy if we’re letting you on television right now? How do you explain that?
DUKE: How do I explain that? I think that you can’t affect the news. You’ve got — I think you have to put some spin on what’s happening in Iran.
BLITZER: But we didn’t have to invite you on CNN.
DUKE: And you want to — it’s an attack mode, always an attack mode when people like myself come on there. But you thought you could handle me with your 11 connotations of the Ku Klux Klan.
BLITZER: All right, let me…
DUKE: But you know something? You can’t handle me, and you can’t handle the truth, and the fact is, you are an agent of Zionism. You work for AIPAC…
BLITZER: Listen — all right. Listen.
DUKE: … the lobby in this country that controls Israeli policy.
BLITZER: Listen, Mr. Duke…
DUKE: You’re not an honest broken on television.
BLITZER: … I am going to read to you what Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said…
DUKE: You’re an Israeli agent.
BLITZER: All right. I’m going to read to you what Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran, has said and then you can respond if you agree of disagree with him. “Israel must be wiped off the map and, God willing, with the force of God behind it, we shall soon experience a world without the United States and Zionism.”
That’s what he said on October 28th, 2005, according to Al- Jazeera.
DUKE: All right, first off, that’s a complete misquote. He never said wipe off the map, and he was talking about the Zionist control of the United States. In fact, I heard his last speech, and I read articles all over the world where he said Israel will be wiped off the map.
He said Israel would have a change in government just as the Soviet Union changed. Obviously, the Russian people weren’t killed. Israel wasn’t wiped out, and this was to garner hatred against Iran to support the Holocaust and maybe the nuclear strike against Iran.
BLITZER: Well, what about when he says we “shall experience a world” — when he says we should “soon experience a world without the United States”?
DUKE: I’m sorry, sir. I couldn’t hear you.
BLITZER: When he says we should “soon experience a world without the United States and Zionism.”
DUKE: I know what the translation was. He was referring to the control — Israel uses the United States as its proxy. They use the — at Mahatmir (ph) said from Malaysia, Israel is able to dominate our policy through their money, through their media control, and they’re leading us to disaster.
Richard Pearl and Paul Wolfowitz he were the formulators of the Iraq war. Pearl, Wurmser and Feith wrote a paper for Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel calling for war against Iraq, Iran, and Syria. And that’s exactly what we did. They made up the lies of 'weapons of mass destruction' because Americans were not willing to die in thousands and spend billions of dollars for Israel’s strategic objectives. That’s the reality.
BLITZER: David Duke, we have to leave it there.
DUKE: And there are so many lies that are going on right now.
BLITZER: The satellite is about to go down. So we have to leave it right there. But you’re in Tehran.
DUKE: Well, people can find information at DavidDuke.com — DavidDuke.com.
BLITZER: I’m sure they’ll have plenty of opportunities to hear what you have to say. That’s it. David Duke joining us from Iran.
A message from David Duke;
I started this thread on the CNN program because it is becoming perhaps the most important bit of video in media history to wake up our people to Jewish extremism and their control over our media.
If you look at the stats for YOUtube video of my showdown with Blitzer you will find this program is now number 1 in many categories!
Getting this program out to the nation and the world has become a high priority for me and hopefully for you as well.
Many stormfronters want to complain about the Jewish control of the media and of American politics.
They complain about the ignorance of many Americans about the problem.
Now here is something concrete you can do to remedy that situation!
Here is the link for the Youtube video of Duke vs. Blitzer!
Please use it!
Use this thread to both talk about the video and its effects on family and friends and to share ways to make it have the maximum reach to the world.
No one, pro or con, will be afraid or reluctant to watch a showdown between Wolf Blitzer and David Duke.
But, when they see this show, we have won!
Duke interview about Zionism (David Duke and Wolf Blitzer CNN interview) on Youtube.
Over 49,000 views and growing like mad, and even in Youtube are different versions of the same show that are not counted here, and this of course does not count the original video still available on CNN which is probably close to a million views by now, not counting the actual broadcast.
Youtube has millions of viewers and it could well rise to the top of the viewer list if it continues.
Even if you have seen it on CNN or other versions, you should watch it in this version and send the link for family and friends and promote it on forums.
The program is the most discussed on You Tube as well and of course has been discussed on thousands of forums around the world.Blitzer is not broadcast on CNN international, so the You Tube version also enables people across the globe to see it.
I don't know of any media program in history that has done more to expose the Jewish extremists and biased media than this one.
Everyone who reads this post, please, please, please help keep this going.
Before doing anything else, mail the link to everyone on your email list.
Then go to some forums and put your two cents in on the Blitzing of Blitzer.
Don't forget that I get my website address out clearly at the end of the show, so every viewing will add to our traffic and almost all of it will come to Stormfront as well.
Everyone complains about the problem, you have a golden opportunity right now to help inform the world and bring millions of more people to our banners!
Honors for This Video:#24 - Most Viewed (Today) - All#2 - Most Viewed (Today) - People - All#22 - Most Viewed (Today) - English#1 - Most Viewed (Today) - People - English#13 - Top Rated (Today) - All#1 - Top Rated (Today) - People - All#13 - Top Rated (Today) - English#1 - Top Rated (Today) - People - English#4 - Most Discussed (Today) - All#1 - Most Discussed (Today) - People - All#4 - Most Discussed (Today) - English#1 - Most Discussed (Today) - People - English#23 - Top Favorites (Today) - All#3 - Top Favorites (Today) - People - All#20 - Top Favorites (Today) - English#2 - Top Favorites (Today) - People - Englishhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-v2f-WC4cjoby David Duke
For decades, the real-life nativity scene at Tatton Park was forced to take place without a few star members.
But the cast is now complete for the first time in living memory - and the greenhouse effect could be responsible.
The annual feature at the estate's Home Farm, was boosted this year by the early arrival of twin lambs, aptly named Holly and Noel.
NWN : Duh ! Or was Jesus born in the Summer like the Bible tells us ?
NWN : Apparently this Connor family tried to commit the very same act only several days earlier, and the Police did nothing . Typical !
We hear the female members of this scum family are inWakefield womens prison and are showing no remorse whatsoever, absolute indifference. If we had a half decent Police Force, who are not corrupt , we could 'bring back the rope'.
A family was today convicted of killing the parents of a vulnerable teenage girl by firebombing their home over a "trivial" school bullying campaign.
Michael Connor, 40, poured petrol through the letterbox of a Wythenshawe house and set it alight to avenge "imagined wrongs" against his 18-year-old daughter Natalie.
The fire swept through the building as Alex and Maureen Cochrane and their daughter Lucy were sleeping upstairs.
Mrs Cochrane, 45, who worked at a garden centre craft shop, died from horrific burns and breathing in hot gasses while she was trapped in her upstairs bedroom.
Her husband Alex, 54, a baggage handler at Manchester Airport, was rescued by firefighters but died in hospital days later.
Their daughter Lucy, 16 at the time, who was found hiding under her bed, was also badly hurt but survived the attack.
Connor, of no fixed abode, was found guilty of murder today after a trial at Manchester Crown Court.
His ex-wife Jane Connor, 40, of Wellfield Road, Baguley, who had incited him to carry out the attack, was also found guilty of murder by the jury.Their daughter Natalie, 18, who had also encouraged her father to firebomb the Cochrane's house in Warmley Road, Brooklands, was cleared of murder but convicted of manslaughter.
President Bush Awards Medal of Freedom
U.S. President George Bush awarded America's highest civilian honor to 10 men and women who have distinguished themselves in contributing to world peace, national security, and culture.
In a glittering East Room of the White House, decorated for the holidays, President Bush presented the Medal of Freedom to teachers, historians, a writer, a musician, a scientist, a former Cabinet official, a baseball player and a former Soviet dissident.
Natan Sharansky spent nine years in a Soviet gulag for working to advance jewish religious liberties and human rights in the former Soviet Union.
President Bush says Sharansky remains a powerful champion of the principles that all (jewish) people deserve to live in freedom, and that the advance of liberty is critical to world peace and security. "Today, the Soviet Union is history, but the world still knows the name Sharansky," said the president. "As a free man, he's become a political leader in Israel, winning four elections to the Knesset, and serving more than eight years in the Cabinet.
Also honored with a Medal of Freedom was literacy pioneer Ruth Johnson Colvin, who founded the Literacy Volunteers of America to help foster reading and language skills.
Former university president Norman Francis was recognized for his work with religious, educational and civil rights organizations, including historically African-American colleges and universities. He also helped in the rebuilding of the Gulf Coast following last year's devastating Hurricane Katrina.
British historian and journalist Paul Johnson was honored for his work on Judaism and Christianity.
Blues singer and guitarist Riley "B.B." King was honored for more than half a century of performances, which have brought him 14 Grammy Awards and induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.
Nobel-Prize-winning scientist Joshua Lederberg received a Medal of Freedom for his work in bacterial genetics and the development of advanced computer technology to assist in the search for life on Mars.
Norman Mineta served as the president's transportation secretary and was honored for what Mr. Bush says are high ideals of service, integrity and courage.
There was a posthumous Medal of Freedom for John Buck O'Neil, an immensely talented baseball player who played during the days of segregation in a separate Negro League, before becoming Major League Baseball's first African-American coach.
"He was the driving force behind the Negro League's Baseball Museum; he was proud to be its chairman," President Bush said of O'Neil. "But he once said: 'It never should have been a Negro League. Shouldn't have been.' Buck O'Neil lived long enough to see the game of baseball, and America, change for the better. He's one of the people we can thank for that. Buck O'Neil was a legend, and he was a beautiful human being."
President Bush also recognized Pulitzer-Prize-winning columnist William Safire as one of America's most talented writers, educating the nation and polishing the language, while vigorously defending human freedoms.
Friday, December 15, 2006
Please do not leave this guy off your Christmas card list.............
Freedom of Speech and the Holocaust
Address by David Duke, PhD at the Holocaust Conference in Tehran, IranDistinguished friends,Thank you Dr. Mohammadi and all the distinguished scholars who are here at a conference that history shall one day deem as one of the most important ofthe 21st century I, and all the conference participants, must be especially thankful to the President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has had the knowledge, the foresight and the courage to convene this conference to offer free speech for the worldâ€™s most repressed idea, Holocaust revisionism.
We must remember that the main themes of this conference, as stated by Iranâ€™s President, are the vital human right of freedom of speech and the condemnation of the shameful imprisonment of European scholars and academics who simply dare tostate their opinions of historical events that occurred over 60 years ago.
This conference embraces the idea of free speech, thought, and conscience.
The U.S. State Department, under thorough control of International Zionism,in a formal statement called this conference a disgrace.
The real disgrace is that free men are imprisoned and silenced in Europe and in other European-descended nations around the world. The disgrace is that no leadersof our own nations seem have the courage to defend free speech.
I also want to thank your President for inviting me, as controversial as I am, to be here. The Zionist-influenced media lies about me with the same enthusiasm as they lie about him.He will be condemned for having me here, and I, as a former American elected official will be condemned by the Zionist influenced press in America for coming here in peace and friendship to a nation that they hate: the nation of Iran.
But, we at this conference have decided that no longer will we let the Zionists dictate to us. They shall not dictate to us who will be our friends, who will be our enemies, nor will we permit them to dictate to us only their version of the past, and we will certainly not let them dictate our future!
Let me say from the outset that I am no disloyal American, I love my country and my people, but I know that the Zionist extremists have lead my country to catastrophe in the Mideast and elsewhere around the world. I know that the Palestinian people, the Lebanese people, and even the American people have been sacrificed on the altar of the Holocaust. It is the chronic media and government playing of the Holocaust that has blinded our eyes to new holocausts and new outrages.
As a truly patriotic American, I oppose Americans being killed or maimed by the thousands in Iraq in a war not for America, but for Israel. I am here because I love my country and oppose those who have lead America and the world to ruin on behalf of Zionism.
In Iraq too, Americans and countless Iraqis, have been sacrificed on the ideological altar of the Holocaust-- for the Holocaust and its chronic recital is used as the justification of any Israeli treachery or crime against humanity.
The Zionist-influenced media in America and Europe is trying to mislead the U.S. and Iran toward a war that would be catastrophic for your country, for my country and for the world. Here too, images of a Holocaust against Jews are used to justify and promote a terrible war against Iran that would constitute a new Holocaust, one against the Iranian people, and indeed for all of us in the world.I believe the people of Iran want peace, and I can tell you that the averageAmerican also wants peace.
This conference is based on freedom of speech, true freedom, not the lipservice brokered in the mass media. Freedom of speech will take on theHolocaust. But, freedom of speech also relies on a free press.Perhaps how little we can trust the establishment press on the issue of the Holocaust is illustrated by the lies told about your esteemed president.This morning, I read a story about this conference from a European newspaper that stated, and I quote, that Iran President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for "wiping Israel off the map." This assertion has been made in literally thousands of newspaper articles, and in radio and TV news reports.But, all those here know that such a translation of his speech is nothing but a big lie. He never said anything of the kind. Any proper translation of his speech shows that he never called for Israel to be quote, wiped from the map! But millions of people in the West and around the world have heard this so many times that they believe it. Whatever might be the ultimatetruth of the Holocaust, how can we learn it from a press that repeats 5,000times a lie about your President that anyone with an Iranian-Englishdictionary can disprove in 5 minutes? In short, their ability to sell this easily disproven lie shows that the media can get away with any lie, even of the largest proportions.
The only way to learn the truth about any idea is free speech, free discussion, and free debate.The conference will include academics who embrace the prevalent historical conception of the Holocaust and those who have a revisionist view.Revisionists question parts of the official Holocaust story. In some Western nations, to diverge even slightly from Holocaust orthodoxy will cause an historian to face not only a loss of academic career but also imprisonment.Right now as I speak, three names come to mind immediately-- David Irving,Ernst Zundel, and Gemar Rudolf. These three men, scholars, researchers,intellects-- who their opponents dare not debate-- these nonviolent, kind and gentle men sit behind dark prison walls at this very moment for simply daring to speak their conscience, for expressing the worlds most forbidden opinion, the idea that the historical event trademarked as the Holocaust as it is popularly presented, is not an accurate historical portrayal, that it needs like all other events of history to be questioned, researched freely and constantly revised.
Perhaps the hypocrisy is illustrated by devotion of Europe to freedom for the vilest kinds of pornography. Every kind of the sickest pornography is allowed in the Western world today, including pornography that delves into the worst forms of sadism and masochism and the vilest degradation of women,many of whom have been drug addicted and truly enslaved in what the worldcalls White slavery. Yet, these sickest, evil forms of porn are not only legal in Europe, they are lucrative!
Yet, if you dare to research and offer a dissenting opinion about any aspect of the event singularly called theHolocaust, its off to prison for you, its bankruptcy for you and your family.
In Europe you can freely question, ridicule, and deny Jesus Christ. The same is true for the prophet Muhammed, and nothing will happen to you, heck you might even get to star in your own weekly TV show, but offer a single question of the smallest part of the Holocaust and you face prison!
David Irving one of the worlds most famous and well-read historians, a writer who many mainstream historians have praised as brilliant and accurate, at this moment sits in a prison near Vienna, Austria for simply stating his historical opinion about Auschwitz in a lecture in Austria in1989. German researcher/chemist Gemar Rudolf faces years of imprisonment for simply publishing a detailed forensic analysis that challenged the authenticity of alleged Auschwitz gas chambers. Ernst Zundel, a resident of Canada and the U.S was ripped from his wife and home because he had politically incorrect opinions about the events of the Second World War.
I have been honored to know personally all three of these men. They are kind, witty, humorous, men of family, of kindness and decency. None of these men were hateful or advocated hate, none were violent or advocated violence,none of these men were terrorists or supported terrorists, none of these men did anything other than express an intellectual opinion at variance with high priests of the Holocaust.
All these men did was have the courage toexpress their opinions even though they knew that by doing so everything they held dear was endangered, their safety, their sustenance, their freedom, but they chose their conscience and their honor, even at the riskof life, that their own heart might be stilled forever. They still stood tall.I am not here to argue the truth or untruth of their claims, that is for the other speakers here, but I am here to add my voice from America from freemen and women everywhere that the fact that these men are imprisoned is a scandal and injustice. The whole world knows that imprisoning men for their opinions is tyranny; that such is the opposite of everything that we mean by the word freedom. As some nations of Europe jail men for their opinions,these same nations boast about their supposed freedom and hold themselves above many other nations they view as repressive and backward.Some of the brave men here today at this conference have been jailed, even physically attacked, lost reputation, freedom, property, career, simply for speaking their conscience. I see a number of them as I look in the audience.And none of these men write or speak hatefully or intemperately, but how can the world even know that, when they and their beliefs are repressed by government and media.
I want to honor one of the men here for his sacrifices over the years in his obedience to conscience and to truth, a man who has laid in a hospital bed with his bones crushed, his pain-racked body burned by acid, all for doing what his intellect dictated and his conscious demanded. He is Dr. RobertFaurisson, and we here and the world owe him a debt that we can never adequately repay. Lesser men would have given up and lived the quiet life,but he gave his all and he still gives us his all even now. I would like to ask you to stand up for him ladies and gentlemen. Robert Faurrison, the best-known revisionist in the world today.
The main theme of the Holocaust Conference is that there must be freedom of speech on this subject as on all others. Free speech, inquiry and debate are the only way to learn the truth on any issue.In prosecutions of Holocaust questioners, authorities have not allowed introduction of any evidence supporting the defendants claims. The courts have even announced in their guilty verdicts that The truth is no defense, i.e. that even if the defendant can be shown to be honest and accurate, and even if his claims can be substantiated by physical and documentary evidence, he has broken the law by simply questioning aspects of the official Holocaust Story.
I take no hard position on the historical accuracy of the Holocaust, I leave that to those whose whole lives are devoted to the study of the issue, but I take an unshakeable position on freedom. Obviously, Jews, as well as other nationalities suffered great losses during the Second World War.Repression, dispossession or murder against any group is wrong.Revisionists don't deny that many Jews died and suffered greatly in the war,they condemn any and all injustices done to Jews in that period.It must also be understood that throughout history, the historical treatmentof atrocities or crimes against humanity have often been colored by political purposes. Throughout history some crimes against humanity have been exaggerated and emphasized to justify political agendas or even war.Other crimes against humanity have been completely ignored or downplayed.
An example is the contrast between the crimes of National Socialist Germany and that of Soviet Communism. Most researchers readily acknowledge that Bolshevism imprisoned, tortured and slaughtered many times more people in Russia and in Eastern Europe than even the high numbers alleged in theHolocaust. Yet, the Soviet Holocaust receives not one-hundredth of the attention of the Jewish Holocaust.
Can anyone here name even a single movieyou have seen about the Bolshevik slaughter?Isn't it sensible to think that this disparity is because of the strong Jewish influence in Western media from the entertainment establishment of Hollywood to the news media centered in New York and across the Europeanworld?
Revisionists suggest that an exaggeration and saturation of theHolocaust has been essential to establishment and support of the Zionist state in Israel and that it offers a psychological excuse for the large scale ethnic cleansing, repression, torture and genocide against thePalestinian people.Revisionists argue that this vested interest of much of the pro-Zionistmedia and pro-Zionist governments affords a danger that the Holocaust can bedistorted and politicized just as many historical crimes against humanityhave either been exaggerated or diminished in pursuit of political agendas.Whether the revisionists scholars are right or wrong is for you to decide,not those who want to crush free thought and free speech.I and every speaker at this conference believe in freedom of speech on allhistorical and contemporary issues.We believe in freedom of speech, conscience, opinion, and expression.It is the opponents of this conference who clearly don't believe in freedom of speech and conscience. It is they who have thrown elderly men and women into prison for years for simply expressing their opinions.
Yet, instead of condemning these tyrants, the media even celebrates the imprisonment of human beings who dare to question.Dr. Bruno Gollnisch, a professor of Literature at the University of Lyon,and a member of the European Parliament was convicted of Holocaust Denial.Speaking in Lyon, France, in October 2004, Gollnisch said: I do not deny the existence of deadly gas chambers. But Iâm not a specialist on thisi ssue, and I think we have to let the historians debate it. He did not contest the hundreds of thousands, the millions of deaths during the Holocaust, but added: As to the way those people died, a debate should takeplace.For simply advocating free speech, Gollnisch was convicted of Holocaust Denial. Has Europe gone crazy?
Freedom of speech is important for two reasons.
First, freedom of speech is a vital human right. It is the cornerstone of all other rights, because without freedom of speech no one has to the right to even freely know and learn of the abrogation of other rights affecting human freedom and survival. That is why the American founding fathers put freedom of speech, press and religion as the first and highest of the Billof Rights.
Second, freedom of speech and debate are absolutely vital for the truth to prevail. If one side of any controversial issue can suppress the voice of opposition, we cannot arrive at the certainty of any truth. If academics andcitizens can be blackmailed monetarily and in career; if they can be threatened with firings, loss of income, or imprisonment for simply sincerely pursuing an historical inquiry and publishing it, how can the truth be discovered?
How does one even know the real revisionist opinion, if that opinion is repressed? A perfect example of the biased treatment of the Western press is the recent adoption of the term Holocaust denier to slander anyone who may question any part of the complex and expansive Holocaust story. The term Holocaustdenier was created by Simon Wiesenthal to denote any one who dares to question any part of his version of the Holocaust. To deny is usually associated with an allegation of a personal crime. For example, John Doe denies that he committed the robbery. It has a very negative connotation.It is not commonly used to denote people holding a contrary historical opinion.
In truth, revisionists are not deniers, they are simply questioners who are being imprisoned and slandered for simply questioning with research and reason this tragic period of history during the Second World War.The Holocaust Conference in Iran is truly about respect for intellectual freedom.Iran has organized the first international conference dedicated to freedom of speech and inquiry on this important historical matter that has so many ramifications on the Mideast and many other present political realities.
I am here in Tehran as a speaker in this conference because I am dedicated to freedom of speech, conscience, and thought. I am honored, as are all of you, to be here at this historic conference.I urge the fair-minded people of the world, before they condemn this conference, the Iranian President, all the speakers and me, to ask the question: who are the patrons of freedom and who are the real deniers, the deniers of our precious human right of freedom of speech!
Dr. David Duke
Former member of the House of Representatives State of Louisiana, United States of America