Wednesday, May 16, 2018

Army Veteran Jailed For Stirring Up Racial Hatred

Jeremy Bedford-Turner

A far-right Army veteran has been jailed for stirring up racial hatred after the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) was pressured to reconsider not bringing charges against him.
Jeremy Bedford-Turner, 48, called for his "soldiers" to liberate England from "Jewish control" in a speech outside Downing Street and blamed Jews for issues ranging from both World Wars to Jack the Ripper.
The CPS declined to prosecute him after an initial complaint but reconsidered the decision after the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) brought a legal challenge at the High Court.
Judge David Tomlinson jailed Bedford-Turner for a year for the "poisonous" and "sinister" speech after a jury convicted him following two hours of deliberation.
The 15-minute speech was made at a rally against Jewish neighbourhood watch group Shomrim in Whitehall, central London, on 4 July 2015.
Bedford-Turner, who served for 12 years in the Army speaking Pashtu and Arabic, told the crowd:
"Let's free England from Jewish control. Let's liberate this land.
"Listen, soldiers, listen to me. It's time to liberate our country."
Under cross-examination during his two-day trial, Bedford-Turner admitted wanting all Jews including children to leave the UK.
Prosecutor Louis Mably QC said the defendant was "absolutely obsessed" with Jewish people and that he "despised" them.
The CAA took the step of bringing a judicial review after prosecutors declined to charge Bedford-Turner.
Bedford-Turner, of no fixed address, was convicted of one count of stirring up racial hatred.
https://www.forces.net/news/army-veteran-jailed-stirring-racial-hatred 

Sunday, May 13, 2018

Freedom for Ursula Haverbeck - demo Bielefeld - 10th May 2018


Seems they jail 89 year old women now in Germany for speaking an alternative view of history.

Justice for Northern Ireland veterans - static protest - Friday, 15th June 2018 - from 11am onwards

Parliament Square Central London

Friday, May 11, 2018


Judge says retired soldier should stand trial for attempted murder of vulnerable man

Accused: Dennis Hutchings 2 2
Accused: Dennis Hutchings
A senior judge has rejected an application to have a case against a former soldier accused of a Troubles-related shooting dismissed.
On Thursday, Mr Justice Colton said that while he was "uneasy" about a prosecution being taken over 40 years after the incident, former soldier Dennis Hutchings should stand trial for the attempted murder of a vulnerable man in 1974.
John Patrick Cunningham was shot in the back as he ran away from an army patrol near Benburb in Co Armagh. Mr Hutchings and 'Soldier B', who has since died, both fired their guns at the fleeing 27-year old, and it cannot be established who discharged the fatal bullet.
Mr Hutchings - who is now 76, in ill health and who did not attend today's hearing - applied to stay the proceedings against him on three grounds; non-availability of evidence, delay in the case and a breach of a promise that he would not be prosecuted for the incident.
A total of five shots were fired by Hutchings and Soldier B from two rifles. It is the Crown's case that by firing three of these shots, Hutchings - who at the time was a Squadron Quarter Master Corporal - intended to kill or cause grievous bodily harm to Mr Cunningham.
From Cornwall, Mr Hutchings has denied charges of attempted murder, and causing grievous bodily harm with intent. The pensioner has made the case it was never his intention to kill or injury Mr Cunningham, but rather he was firing warning shots to get him to stop.
Other soldiers who were present at the scene provided statements in the aftermath of the 1974 killing, saying that whilst they heard shots they did not actually see Hutchings discharge his rifle.
Belfast Crown Court heard a lack of other evidence raised by the defence includes the "absence of the original investigation file", a failure to establish a property crime scene, inconsistencies about who seized the rifles from the scene, and the absence of evidence explaining "how, when and by whom" Mr Cunningham's remains were taken to the mortuary for a post mortem.
Regarding the delay in bringing the case to court, Mr Justice Colton said the prosecution were seeking to rely on the statements of other soldiers who are now deceased, and that "no enquiries can be made of their memory of these events."
Telling the court "I admit I an uneasy about a prosecution over 40 years after the event", the Judge said he was nonetheless satisfied a fair trial would be possible.
Mr Justice Colton also mentioned the issue of a breach of promise, and that Hutchings was told in 1974 and again in 1975 he would not be prosecuted.
During today's judgement, the court heard that in September 2011, the circumstances surrounding Mr Cunningham's death were examined by the HET. Following correspondence between the victim's family and the Attorney General, a review into the case resulted in the Public Prosecution Service's conclusion that the test for prosecution had been met.
Refusing the application to stay the proceedings, Mr Justice Colton spoke of the fundamental issue of a fair trial and said he was satisfied this is what Hutchings would get.
Hutching has not yet been arraigned - where the charges will be put to him and he will enter pleas of either 'guilty' or 'not guilty.
The case will be mentioned again at the end of June.
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/judge-says-retired-soldier-should-stand-trial-for-attempted-murder-of-vulnerable-man-36893417.html

Tuesday, May 08, 2018

BREAKING NEWS: Trump tells France's Macron that the U.S. will pull out of the Obama-era nuclear bargain with Iran that he's called 'insane' and 'the worst deal ever'

  • Trump is threatening to reimpose sanctions on Iran on the deal's May 12 deadline
  • Will make an announcement today at the White House on what he will do
  • Reportedly informed France's Emmanuel Macron in a phone call this morning that he will pull the U.S. out
  • A senior British diplomat told DailyMail.com the U.K. is 'deeply pessimistic' ahead of public Trump's announcement today 
  • Trump is expected to say he'll pull the U.S. out of the agreement 
  • Has been blasting the deal and former secretary of state John Kerry, who helped to negotiate the agreement, in tweets this week
  • External sanctions on companies that do business with Iran would hurt Europe  
President Donald Trump informed France's Emmanuel Macron in a phone call this morning that he will pull the U.S. out the nuclear deal it signed onto three years ago after intense negotiations with Tehran. 
The New York Times reports that a person briefed on the conversation said Trump plans to reinstate all of the sanctions the U.S. waived in conjunction with the nuclear deal. Trump also plans to impose additional sanctions on Tehran, the Times' source said. 
Macron's office told Reuters that the Times' report was incorrect. However, European officials told the wire service that they do expect Trump to announce today that he's exiting the accord. U.S. officials told AP and AFP the same thing.
Trump's anticipated action had U.S. allies on edge. A senior British diplomat told DailyMail.com the U.K. is 'deeply pessimistic' ahead of public Trump's announcement today. 
President Donald Trump says he will be announcing his decision on the Iran nuclear deal this afternoon at the White House
President Donald Trump says he will be announcing his decision on the Iran nuclear deal this afternoon at the White House
Iran's Hasan Rouhani (right) said the U.S. will have 'historic remorse' for its decision while insisting that 'getting rid of America’s mischievous presence will be fine for Iran'
President Donald Trump informed France's Emmanuel Macron in a phone call this morning that he will pull the U.S. out the nuclear deal it signed onto three years ago after intense negotiations with Tehran
President Donald Trump informed France's Emmanuel Macron in a phone call this morning that he will pull the U.S. out the nuclear deal it signed onto three years ago after intense negotiations with Tehran
European leaders whose countries are party to the deal have been begging Trump to remain in the agreement. 
It could fall apart without U.S. participation while the follow-on accord he demanded is worked out, they've said. European officials have also warned Trump that Tehran could set off a nuclear arms race in the Middle East if it restarts its uranium enrichment program.
Iran's Hassan Rouhani was vowing to stick by the deal that provided massive sanctions relief on Monday, so long as Europe guarantees that his country's interests will be protected. It was unclear in the lead-up to Trump's decision, though, if that would realistically be the case.
Rouhani said the U.S. will have 'historic remorse' for its decision while insisting that 'getting rid of America’s mischievous presence will be fine for Iran.'
'If we can get what we want from a deal without America, then Iran will continue to remain committed to the deal,' Rouhani said according to the Iran Daily. 'What Iran wants is our interests to be guaranteed by non-American signatories.' 
Trump says he will be announcing his decision on the Iran nuclear deal this afternoon at the White House in remarks that will be delivered straight to camera at 2 pm.
It will come as no surprise globally if Trump says he's pulling the U.S. out of the 2015 agreement he inherited from the previous administration. The big unknown is what Trump will say he wants to happen next. 
Trump's legislative director, Marc Short, told DailyMail.com on Tuesday morning that the president 'wants to see Iran end its nuclear program but also become a nation that is not funding terrorism, not attacking Israel not looking to continue to attack allies that we have. 
'I think he's looking for an agreement that brings Iran into the international community as opposed to being a rogue nation state that funds terrorism,' Short said during a press scrum on the driveway leading into the West Wing.
Trump is anticipated to allow the oil sanctions that legally come up for discussion every 120 days under the deal to be reimposed on Tehran. The sanctions cut Iran's oil exports in half in 2012, Foreign Policy reports, and crippled the Islamic Republic's economy.
European companies will have to choose, if the sanctions are slapped back on, whether they want to do business with the U.S. or the taboo government, putting them in an undesirable position. 
John Glaser, director of foreign policy studies at the right-leaning Cato Institute, warned Tuesday that if the U.S. imposes external sanctions successfully, European companies will pull out of investment projects in Iran, removing the incentives that Rouhani would need to mollify hardliners in his country who want Iran to restart its nuclear program.
'With lots of political will this deal could remain in place without the United States, but its going to be very, very difficult for the participants to manage,' Glaser said.
Iran will feel 'unburdened' if the U.S. leaves the pact, he said, and is likely to install new centrifuges to spin uranium and limit access to inspectors. 
'This could really unravel into something with grave consequences,' he cautioned.  'All my fingers and toes are crossed, because this is a good deal that should continue to be implemented.'
U.K. foreign minister Boris Johnson worried that Trump could take military action against Tehran on top of the expected sanctions renewal. He also warned that collapse of the deal could set off a nuclear arms race in the Middle East with Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the U.A.E. wanting weapons, as well.
'It's already a very, very dangerous state at the moment, we don't want to go down that road. There doesn't seem to me at the moment to be a viable military solution,' Johnson told Fox & Friends.
Johnson was in the U.S. making last-ditch pleas for the U.S. to stay in the deal to Trump's national security adviser, John Bolton, the U.S. secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, Vice President Mike Pence and the president's daughter Ivanka and son-in-law Jared Kushner, both of whom are senior White House officials. 
 
NWN:  And we got taken in with Trumps cliches like "Draining the swamp....".  This is following Israels lead 100% .  Shameful indeed.

Wednesday, May 02, 2018

George Galloway interviews Martin Webster for RT television
 

Sunday, April 22, 2018

When the National Front and a handful of British Movement opposed a TUC march for multi racialism in Manchester city centre circa 1978




Leading this traitorous procession that day was Tom Jackson,  TUC leader at the time. 

Jackson can be seen with the fat belly and white shirt with tie in the first pic directly central and in front of the TGWU banner. Jackson always sported a huge moustache . He was a favoured gobshite of the left in the 1970's.

'Dogs abuse' and smoke bombs were thrown here on Mosley street at the 'communist' march- very apt that. Their march was just coming out into Piccadilly gardens. No arrests were made.



Oldham BNP meeting in 1999 - from the NWN camera.

Monthly meetings attracted over 100 members and collections always raised over £1,000 + . Then the rot set in. We have previously put up video of excerpts of this meeting over on Youtube.

This was all pre-Griffin 'leadership'. Treacy was later a staunch Griffinite . Jackson tried to play on both sides. Jackson for no clear reason, placed Treacy as Oldham's Branch Organiser - a very bad mistake as it turned out. Quite quickly, Treacy ran Oldham BNP into the ground, and he then disappeared from whence he came.

Previously, Oldham had been formed and run by Rochdale BNP and it's Organiser.

Army Veteran Jailed For Stirring Up Racial Hatred ...